TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

pdf.usaid.gov
from pdf.usaid.gov More from this publisher
17.01.2014 Views

30& IMPROVBlD:NT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL RANGELANDS Sacred Groves The sacred groves were strictly protected patches of forests that were only occasionally utilized in times of distress. Consequently, they had some of the best preserved natural vegetation. The British attitude towards these groves is well expreseed in the following quot.. tion from Buchanan, one of the earliest British chroniclers of Peninsular India: The fOnlt. are the property of the toda of the viIlat- iD which they are .ituated, ud ~e t~ 0lllht not to be cut without haviDl obtained leave &om the . . . prielt to the temple of the vill&le lod. The idol rec:eivee no~iIll for trUtml th. permillionj but the n8llect of the ceremony of wiDl hit leave brin.. VeDleuce on ~e piky perIOn. Th......., therefore, merely a contrivuC8 to prevent the lOftnUIleDt &om claiminl the property. (Buchuu 1802j reprinted 1958). All the groves on communal land were taken by the state as reserved forests, leaving thoee in the midst of cultivated land under private control. In this tract, the sacred groves taken over were constituted a so-called -green forests" from which people were authorised to remove only dead and fallen wood. These groves retained well-preserved tree cover throughout the colonial period. Minor Forest Roughly half the uncultivated land was put under the control of the land revenue authorities of the government and constituted either a minor forest or a leaf manure forest land. The entire local community had full accees to the minor forest land for meeting their fuelwood, grazing, and leaf manure requirements without payment of any charges. This right .included the cutting of live wood. With no communal management, the minor forests were overutilized and depleted in many areas. Panchayat Forests A few pockets of minor forest land continued under the control of local communities, which constituted a council or IHlflClatJ,tJt for their management. With continuing control by village communities, many such ptJflClatJ,tJt forests were managed in a IIUIItainable fahion and retained good forest stock throughout the British period.

CHANGING PATrERNS IN THE BEDTHI·AGHANASHINI VALLEYS 307 Leaf Manure Forests In the pre-British period, the arecanut orchard owners claimed rights, either individually or 811 a clan, over forest tracts immediately adjacent to their orchards. This right ofownership was not conceded by the British government, and this land wu taken over uland under ownership of land revenue authorities. Nevertheless, the orchard owners were conceded extensive privileges offree grazing and fuel and leaf manure collection from these lands. They were also permitted to extract some timber from the leaf manure land on payment of charges provided that a minimum density of 100 trees per hectare was maintained. llTElllNDEPENDENCE The New SYltem There had been a vigorous debate during the independence struggle over the kind of society and economy that the country should strive for on achieving independence. Mahatma Gandhi had advocated the restoration of a self-reliant and largely self-sufficient village economy. This would have implied strong communal control over the common property resources. Mahatma Gandhi W8II also against industrialization on the western model. On the other hand, Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of independent India, favored vigorous pursuit of modernization and industrialization. He also favored centralized planning on the Soviet model, albeit in the context of a mixed economy. Nehru's point of view largely carried the day, especially 811 it coincided with the interests of the business and the urban literate cl88llel!l who have dominated the policies since independence. ~ implemented, this policy hu resulted in state sponsorship of heavy industry and power and irrigation projects, leaving other sectors largely in private hands. Resources were made available to the private and public industrial sector at highly subsidized rates to promote their growth. Forest-based industry thus was &IIIIured a supply offorest raw materials on a long-term basis at throwaway prices. These policies meant that demands on the resources of the uncultivated lands and waters of the country were substantially stepped up. This generated pressures for further alienation of the local rural population from access to these resources. For instance, there were moves to take over minor forests to raise industrial plantations, and

CHANGING PATrERNS IN THE BEDTHI·AGHANASHINI VALLEYS 307<br />

Leaf Manure Forests<br />

In the pre-British period, the arecanut orchard owners claimed<br />

rights, either individually or 811 a clan, over forest tracts immediately<br />

adjacent to their orchards. This right ofownership was not conceded<br />

by the British government, <strong>and</strong> this l<strong>and</strong> wu taken over ul<strong>and</strong> under<br />

ownership of l<strong>and</strong> revenue authorities. Nevertheless, the orchard<br />

owners were conceded extensive privileges offree grazing <strong>and</strong> fuel <strong>and</strong><br />

leaf manure collection from these l<strong>and</strong>s. They were also permitted<br />

to extract some timber from the leaf manure l<strong>and</strong> on payment of<br />

charges provided that a minimum density of 100 trees per hectare<br />

was maintained.<br />

llTElllNDEPENDENCE<br />

The New SYltem<br />

There had been a vigorous debate during the independence struggle<br />

over the kind of society <strong>and</strong> economy that the country should<br />

strive for on achieving independence. Mahatma G<strong>and</strong>hi had advocated<br />

the restoration of a self-reliant <strong>and</strong> largely self-sufficient village<br />

economy. This would have implied strong communal control over<br />

the common property resources. Mahatma G<strong>and</strong>hi W8II also against<br />

industrialization on the western model. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, Jawaharlal<br />

Nehru, the first prime minister of independent India, favored<br />

vigorous pursuit of modernization <strong>and</strong> industrialization. He also favored<br />

centralized planning on the Soviet model, albeit in the context<br />

of a mixed economy. Nehru's point of view largely carried the day,<br />

especially 811 it coincided with the interests of the business <strong>and</strong> the<br />

urban literate cl88llel!l who have dominated the policies since independence.<br />

~ implemented, this policy hu resulted in state sponsorship<br />

of heavy industry <strong>and</strong> power <strong>and</strong> irrigation projects, leaving other<br />

sectors largely in private h<strong>and</strong>s. Resources were made available to<br />

the private <strong>and</strong> public industrial sector at highly subsidized rates to<br />

promote their growth. Forest-based industry thus was &IIIIured a supply<br />

offorest raw materials on a long-term basis at throwaway prices.<br />

These policies meant that dem<strong>and</strong>s on the resources of the uncultivated<br />

l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> waters of the country were substantially stepped<br />

up. This generated pressures for further alienation of the local rural<br />

population from access to these resources. For instance, there were<br />

moves to take over minor forests to raise industrial plantations, <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!