17.01.2014 Views

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION 15<br />

protein per hour of labor than does pastoralism. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

ranching requires vastly greater inputs of energy, <strong>and</strong> expenses incurred<br />

in connection with fencing, water development, brush control,<br />

revegetation, grazing management, <strong>and</strong> selective breeding are substantial.<br />

Pastoral systems represent the principal form of rangel<strong>and</strong> utilization<br />

in Africa <strong>and</strong> Asia. They involve significant social adaptations<br />

to the movement of livestock or wildlife from one location<br />

to another in relation to the availability of forage <strong>and</strong> water. The<br />

rangel<strong>and</strong>s utilized are seldom privately owned, <strong>and</strong> mechanical <strong>and</strong><br />

chemical inputs are seldom prominent. The systems are labor intensive.<br />

It has been estimated that livestock <strong>and</strong> wildlife support<br />

some 30-40 million pastoralists, <strong>and</strong> the animals <strong>and</strong> animal products<br />

associated with pastoral systems are critical to millions of other<br />

individuals in settled communities (International Institute for Environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> Development <strong>and</strong> the World Resources Institute, 1987).<br />

The importance of livestock in pastoral systems exceeds their<br />

value as sources of milk, meat, blood, <strong>and</strong> hides. Livestock often<br />

represent a means of accumulating capital <strong>and</strong>, in some societies, are<br />

associated with social status. They are assets that can reproduce<br />

<strong>and</strong> that can be liquidated should cash be required. In addition to<br />

supporting livestock, rangel<strong>and</strong>s serve as sources of other significant<br />

economic products: bushmeat, fruits, berries, nuts, leaves, flowers,<br />

tubers, <strong>and</strong> other food for human populations, as well as medicinal<br />

plants, building materials, thatch, fencing, gums, tannin, incense,<br />

<strong>and</strong> other products important to the economies of rural populations<br />

(Sale, 1981; National Research Council, 1983; Malhotra, Khomne,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Gadgil, 1983).<br />

The importance of rangel<strong>and</strong>s as sources of bushmeat <strong>and</strong> vegetable<br />

foods for human populations deserves special attention. These<br />

foods are derived from species that are well adapted to the environmental<br />

peculiarities of the regions in which they are found. Hence,<br />

such foods are often available in the event of crop failure or substantial<br />

losses of livestock. Even during periods with average rainfall,<br />

satisfactory crop yields, <strong>and</strong> herd stability, such foods constituted a<br />

significant part of local diets. Indeed, in many societies, the offtake<br />

of wildlife from rangel<strong>and</strong>s exceeds that of livestock in importance.<br />

In 1959, for example, the sedentary <strong>and</strong> pastoral peoples of the<br />

Senegal River Valley in West Africa relied upon fish <strong>and</strong> wildlife<br />

for over 85 percent of the meat that they consumed (Cremoux,<br />

1963); native plants were of equal or greater importance. Since

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!