TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands

pdf.usaid.gov
from pdf.usaid.gov More from this publisher
17.01.2014 Views

226 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGBLANDS an area and its choice as a pastoral sone. Howwer, siDce his data only deala with 1959-t.n admittedly humid yea~here is no Ulurance that such overlap in rainfall occurrence is an absolute prerequisite for an area's selection. 15. Biuon, -Nomadisation ch.. lell Reguibat L'Gouacem,· p. 53; and Borricand, "'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p.89. 16. M. F. Bonnet-Duperron, Oartu de I'B...,c mMauriani.: D~ ,aUonnicr, del 11....., m NN. d tnO,.,... Mauri",,;c (Cane 1/500,000, en 2 feuillell: la-Ouest, et Ib-est; Paris: ORSTOM, 1950). Th.. maps are an often quoted lOurce for the pastoral reeime of lOuthem Mauritania, and they point out this pattem clearly. Althoueh cluttered and often confuine, they remain the mOlt detailed work on the lOuthem half of the conntry. For other general statements on the reeime, see Borricand, "'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· pp. 86-87; and Toupet, '"L'nolution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie sah'lienne: pp.69-70. 17. Ibid., p. 70; and Capot-Rey, "'I.e nomadisme pastoral,· NoMllllu It nomcaclimu au ,aIaarca (Recherchell sur la Zone Aride No. 19; Paris: UNESCO, 1963), pp. 72-73. 18. Borricand,"'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p. 87. 19. See Paul Marty, Etv.du IUr l'I.am. d lu Cri6ul Mauru: Lu BI"IMna (Collection de la Revue du Monde Muulmanj Paris: Emest Leroux, 1921) an example of these limited movementa in the Brakna area. 20. Capot-Rey, Lc Salaarca ~aU, in L'Afrique blanche franc;aiae (Paris: Pre_ Univenitairllll de France) 11:259; and Borricand, -Le nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p. 86. 21. Toupet, -L'6volution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie sahlUienne,· p.73. 22. Ibid., p. 71. 23. Paul Dubie, -La vie mat'rielle des Mauretl,· MlllJtIfu EtItnDIogiquu (Memoirllll de l'lnatitut Franc;ais d'Afrique Noire, No. 23; (Dabr: IFAN, 1953), pp. 122, 139. 24. Toupet, -L'nolution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie lahelienne,· p.72. 25. Ibid., pp. 74-75. 26. Bonnet-Dupeyron, Cartc de I'Bcl1lJ1C cn Mt1trioN. (Ia-Ouellt). 27. Capot-Rey, LG Salaarca~.., pp. 258-259.

Case Study 2 The Beni Mguild ofMorocco DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON Deciding just how nomadic or sedentary a particular tribal group in rural Morocco is poses a major problem, for nearly every possible combination of nomadism and agriculture can be found from group to group and often within one group itself. Consider, for example, the At Atta on the Saharan aide of the AtIu, some of whose subgroups are fully nomadic, l while others are either partially sedentary or are only partially nomadic. 2 It is also common for sedentary agriculturalists to keep animals u a means ofusing otherwise unexploitable areas and engaging in transhumant movements to bring these animals to better seasonal putures.' Indeed, as Blanche points out," all sedentaries keep some animals and all nomads do some supplementary farming, so that "pure" nomadism hardly exists. It becomes quite difficult, therefore, to determine what group is essentially nomadic unless primary weight is placed upon the relative importance of the role played by animal husbandry and agriculture within the tribal economy. With this criterion in mind, it seems fair to say that the subjects of this case study, the Beni Mguild of central Morocco, are essentially a nomadic group. For while the pastoral-agricultural regime of the Beni Mguild hu frequently been described as a double transhumance& in which the cultivation of cereal crops plays a large role, it is the necessity to shift their herds ofsheep and goats between 227

Case Study 2<br />

The Beni Mguild ofMorocco<br />

DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON<br />

Deciding just how nomadic or sedentary a particular tribal group<br />

in rural Morocco is poses a major problem, for nearly every possible<br />

combination of nomadism <strong>and</strong> agriculture can be found from group<br />

to group <strong>and</strong> often within one group itself. Consider, for example, the<br />

At Atta on the Saharan aide of the AtIu, some of whose subgroups<br />

are fully nomadic, l while others are either partially sedentary or are<br />

only partially nomadic. 2 It is also common for sedentary agriculturalists<br />

to keep animals u a means ofusing otherwise unexploitable areas<br />

<strong>and</strong> engaging in transhumant movements to bring these animals to<br />

better seasonal putures.' Indeed, as Blanche points out," all sedentaries<br />

keep some animals <strong>and</strong> all nomads do some supplementary<br />

farming, so that "pure" nomadism hardly exists. It becomes quite<br />

difficult, therefore, to determine what group is essentially nomadic<br />

unless primary weight is placed upon the relative importance of the<br />

role played by animal husb<strong>and</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> agriculture within the tribal<br />

economy.<br />

With this criterion in mind, it seems fair to say that the subjects<br />

of this case study, the Beni Mguild of central Morocco, are<br />

essentially a nomadic group. For while the pastoral-agricultural<br />

regime of the Beni Mguild hu frequently been described as a double<br />

transhumance& in which the cultivation of cereal crops plays a large<br />

role, it is the necessity to shift their herds ofsheep <strong>and</strong> goats between<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!