TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
226 IMPROVEMENT OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPIOAL RANGBLANDS an area and its choice as a pastoral sone. Howwer, siDce his data only deala with 1959-t.n admittedly humid yea~here is no Ulurance that such overlap in rainfall occurrence is an absolute prerequisite for an area's selection. 15. Biuon, -Nomadisation ch.. lell Reguibat L'Gouacem,· p. 53; and Borricand, "'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p.89. 16. M. F. Bonnet-Duperron, Oartu de I'B...,c mMauriani.: D~ ,aUonnicr, del 11....., m NN. d tnO,.,... Mauri",,;c (Cane 1/500,000, en 2 feuillell: la-Ouest, et Ib-est; Paris: ORSTOM, 1950). Th.. maps are an often quoted lOurce for the pastoral reeime of lOuthem Mauritania, and they point out this pattem clearly. Althoueh cluttered and often confuine, they remain the mOlt detailed work on the lOuthem half of the conntry. For other general statements on the reeime, see Borricand, "'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· pp. 86-87; and Toupet, '"L'nolution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie sah'lienne: pp.69-70. 17. Ibid., p. 70; and Capot-Rey, "'I.e nomadisme pastoral,· NoMllllu It nomcaclimu au ,aIaarca (Recherchell sur la Zone Aride No. 19; Paris: UNESCO, 1963), pp. 72-73. 18. Borricand,"'I.e nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p. 87. 19. See Paul Marty, Etv.du IUr l'I.am. d lu Cri6ul Mauru: Lu BI"IMna (Collection de la Revue du Monde Muulmanj Paris: Emest Leroux, 1921) an example of these limited movementa in the Brakna area. 20. Capot-Rey, Lc Salaarca ~aU, in L'Afrique blanche franc;aiae (Paris: Pre_ Univenitairllll de France) 11:259; and Borricand, -Le nomadisme en Mauritanie,· p. 86. 21. Toupet, -L'6volution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie sahlUienne,· p.73. 22. Ibid., p. 71. 23. Paul Dubie, -La vie mat'rielle des Mauretl,· MlllJtIfu EtItnDIogiquu (Memoirllll de l'lnatitut Franc;ais d'Afrique Noire, No. 23; (Dabr: IFAN, 1953), pp. 122, 139. 24. Toupet, -L'nolution de la nomadisation en Mauritanie lahelienne,· p.72. 25. Ibid., pp. 74-75. 26. Bonnet-Dupeyron, Cartc de I'Bcl1lJ1C cn Mt1trioN. (Ia-Ouellt). 27. Capot-Rey, LG Salaarca~.., pp. 258-259.
Case Study 2 The Beni Mguild ofMorocco DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON Deciding just how nomadic or sedentary a particular tribal group in rural Morocco is poses a major problem, for nearly every possible combination of nomadism and agriculture can be found from group to group and often within one group itself. Consider, for example, the At Atta on the Saharan aide of the AtIu, some of whose subgroups are fully nomadic, l while others are either partially sedentary or are only partially nomadic. 2 It is also common for sedentary agriculturalists to keep animals u a means ofusing otherwise unexploitable areas and engaging in transhumant movements to bring these animals to better seasonal putures.' Indeed, as Blanche points out," all sedentaries keep some animals and all nomads do some supplementary farming, so that "pure" nomadism hardly exists. It becomes quite difficult, therefore, to determine what group is essentially nomadic unless primary weight is placed upon the relative importance of the role played by animal husbandry and agriculture within the tribal economy. With this criterion in mind, it seems fair to say that the subjects of this case study, the Beni Mguild of central Morocco, are essentially a nomadic group. For while the pastoral-agricultural regime of the Beni Mguild hu frequently been described as a double transhumance& in which the cultivation of cereal crops plays a large role, it is the necessity to shift their herds ofsheep and goats between 227
- Page 185 and 186: REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES 175 6onne
- Page 187 and 188: REHAB1LJTATION TECHNIQUES 117 Desic
- Page 189 and 190: RE1lAlJ1LlTATION TBOHNlQUBS 179 tra
- Page 191 and 192: RElIABlLlTATION TEOHNIQUES 181 sand
- Page 193 and 194: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 183 Barke
- Page 195 and 196: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 185 Sb.nl
- Page 197 and 198: CRlTERlA FOR PLANT SELECTION 187
- Page 199 and 200: ORITERIA FOR PLANT SELEOTlON 189 La
- Page 201 and 202: ORJTERIA FOR PLANT SBLEOTION 191 70
- Page 203 and 204: CRITERIA FOR PLANT SELECTION 193 AD
- Page 205 and 206: 0R1TER1A 'OR PLANT SICLEOTION 195 m
- Page 207 and 208: CRITERIA FOR PLANT SICLECTION 197 C
- Page 209 and 210: CRITERIA 'OR PLANT SELEOTION 199 di
- Page 211 and 212: • ORJTERIA FOR PLANT SELECTION 20
- Page 213 and 214: ORJTERIA FOR PLANT SELEOTlON 203 st
- Page 215 and 216: ORITERIA FOR PLANT SELECTION 205 An
- Page 217 and 218: ORJTBRIA FOR PLANT SELECTION 207 In
- Page 219: CRITERlA FOR PLANT SELEOTlON 209 Mo
- Page 223 and 224: Introduction to the Case Studies Su
- Page 225 and 226: INTRODUOTION TO THE OASE STUDIES 21
- Page 227 and 228: PASTORAL REGIMES 0' MAURITANIA 217
- Page 229 and 230: PASTORAL REGIMES 0' MAURITANIA 219
- Page 231 and 232: PASTORAL REGIMES 0' MAURITANIA 221
- Page 233 and 234: PASTORAL REGIMES 0' MAURITANIA 223
- Page 235: PASTORAL REGIMES OF MAURITANIA 225
- Page 239 and 240: THE BEN! MGUILD OF MOROOOO 229 on t
- Page 241 and 242: THE BENI MGUILD OF MOROOOO 231 thei
- Page 243 and 244: THE BENI MGUILD OF MOROOOO 238 Alth
- Page 245 and 246: THE BEN! MGUILD OF MOROOOO 235 -tle
- Page 247 and 248: Case Study 3 The Kel Tamasheq SUSAN
- Page 249 and 250: TIn: KEL TAMASHEQ 239 TABLE 8-1 Ave
- Page 251 and 252: THE KEL TAMAS11EQ 20U TABLE S-4 Com
- Page 253 and 254: TIlE KEL TAMASHEQ TABLE 3-6 Proport
- Page 255 and 256: THE KEL TAMABHEQ 245 maintain healt
- Page 257 and 258: 25 0 25 IlO 75100 , ";) ~ 1:25kmL N
- Page 259 and 260: THE KEL TAMASHEQ the two somehow me
- Page 261 and 262: • Major well • Seuonal ftll •
- Page 263 and 264: THE KEL TAMASHEQ 253 FIGURE 3-3 T8n
- Page 265 and 266: THE KEL TAMASHEQ 255 N 1 I.. I ----
- Page 267 and 268: THE KEL TAMASHEQ 257 about 10 m to
- Page 269 and 270: TABLE 1-10 ComparUoD ofU_ of Variou
- Page 271 and 272: Case Study 4 Dromedary Pastoralism
- Page 273 and 274: DROMEDARY PASTORALISM IN AFRIOA AND
- Page 275 and 276: DROMEDARY PASTORAUSM IN AFRIOA AND
- Page 277 and 278: DROMEDARY PASTORALISM IN AFRIOA AND
- Page 279 and 280: DROMEDARY PASTORALISM IN AFRIOA AND
- Page 281 and 282: DROMEDARY PASTORALISM IN AFRIOA AND
- Page 283 and 284: DROMEDARY PASTORALISM IN AFRIOA AND
Case Study 2<br />
The Beni Mguild ofMorocco<br />
DOUGLAS L. JOHNSON<br />
Deciding just how nomadic or sedentary a particular tribal group<br />
in rural Morocco is poses a major problem, for nearly every possible<br />
combination of nomadism <strong>and</strong> agriculture can be found from group<br />
to group <strong>and</strong> often within one group itself. Consider, for example, the<br />
At Atta on the Saharan aide of the AtIu, some of whose subgroups<br />
are fully nomadic, l while others are either partially sedentary or are<br />
only partially nomadic. 2 It is also common for sedentary agriculturalists<br />
to keep animals u a means ofusing otherwise unexploitable areas<br />
<strong>and</strong> engaging in transhumant movements to bring these animals to<br />
better seasonal putures.' Indeed, as Blanche points out," all sedentaries<br />
keep some animals <strong>and</strong> all nomads do some supplementary<br />
farming, so that "pure" nomadism hardly exists. It becomes quite<br />
difficult, therefore, to determine what group is essentially nomadic<br />
unless primary weight is placed upon the relative importance of the<br />
role played by animal husb<strong>and</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> agriculture within the tribal<br />
economy.<br />
With this criterion in mind, it seems fair to say that the subjects<br />
of this case study, the Beni Mguild of central Morocco, are<br />
essentially a nomadic group. For while the pastoral-agricultural<br />
regime of the Beni Mguild hu frequently been described as a double<br />
transhumance& in which the cultivation of cereal crops plays a large<br />
role, it is the necessity to shift their herds ofsheep <strong>and</strong> goats between<br />
227