TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
4 OVERVIEW rangelands and forces pastoralists to increase use pressure on the remaining land base. Risks are highest in the more arid rangelands where rainfall is lowest, or least dependable, and where evaporation and transpiration rates are high•. Soil erosion is another consequence of rangeland mismanagement. Generally, it is a natural and continuous process, but in undisturbed ec:oeystems with a protective cover of plants, the soil is U8Ually regenerated at the same rate that it is lost. If soil and vegetative cover are not in balance, erosion is accelerated. Under natural conditions, it takes several hundred years to generate a few millimeters of topsoil, but it can be lost to erosion in minutes if no protective vegetation is present. Rehabilitating rangelands requUes a respite from their intensive use. This involves the elaboration of a program of land management or, as a last resort, a program of land preparation, seeding, and planting, followed by careful management of use by livestock. To bring about such a program, alternative supplies of water, fuel, food, and other services may have to be provided to local pastoralists while the improvement is taking place. It is often helpful to develop programs of range improvement with reference to precolonial indigenous adaptations, where applicable, and knowledge of the changes that have occurred in local systems of production through time. Employing local people in seeding and planting efforts must also be a part of the development program. Local people must participate fully in demonstration projects; their understanding and commitment is clearly necessary for succell8. Protection of a large number of relatively small rangeland areas is especially valuable to reveal what species are present, to provide for seed production, and to demonstrate the potential for ecological recovery. Demonstrating benefits that can be obtained by restoring the full natural cover and productivity of the vegetation may be a means of persuading local people that relaxing pressure on grazing lands is essential. However, this alone does not mean that long-term viability will be established. Protected areas and other conservation measures may restrict accell8 to fuel, food, forage, and other products. If substitutes are not provided to compensate for the 1088 of these resources, the local community is likely to frustrate the conservation measures. Compensatory measures might include improving pasture quality, establishing fuelwood or animal fodder plantations, or providing credit, alternative food, supplemental animal feed, fuel, or fiber, as appropriate. Ifthe measures concerned take time to yield
OVERVIEW 5 results, they must be supplemented by measures that bring immediate benefits. For example, if a protected area or watershed forest is threatened by wood-cutting for fuel, it will be necessary to provide an alternative source of fuel that can be used immediately. AN IGNORED RESOURCE Dry grazing lands are largely ignored by governments and technical assistance agencies. Very little agricultural research funding goes to rangeland development. This stems partly from the limited political power of pastoralists or typical rangeland populations, and partly from the high cost of traditional land rehabilitation practices. AB a consequence of this neglect, opportunities have been lost to make vast marginal areas more productive for pastoral people and other rural populations. Further, deteriorating rangelands contribute to flooding; when precipitation interception and infiltration are reduced, runoff correspondingly increases. The problem is compounded by the downstream effects of flooding, variously including damage to crope and settlements. Insufficient reeearch is aimed at finding ways to protect existing rangeland or identifying appropriate new crope that would complement livestock production. Agronomists the world over are taught the principles of agricultural land management, but are unfamiliar with special rangeland techniques. The uninformed conversion of rangeland to cropland has helped destroy rangelands. For example, the moldboard plow destroys the surface vegetation and exposes thin, dry soil to erosion by wind and water. Clearly, abuse ofrangelands has accelerated erosion, at times rapidly, at times slowly. AB soil erodes, sediments enter water courses and river bottoms, estuaries, and deltas, which have become the sink for nutrient-laden sediments. CAUSES 01 ENVm.ONMENTAL DEGRADATION The causes ofland degradation must be understood in developing a strategy for land rehabilitation. Before costly methods are applied to promote range improvement, existing degradation forces should be identified and countered. Although the role of specific social forces is frequently unclear, devegetation-the progressive disappearance of plants from the land-is generally the result of human activities: overexploitation by man and his animals. Degradation can begin with the depauperization of woodlands
- Page 3 and 4: - ....... .I,"U1J:1~ National Resea
- Page 5: PANEL ON THE IMPROVEMENT or TROPICA
- Page 8 and 9: can be restored to the world's rang
- Page 10 and 11: 4 Dromedary Pastoralism in Mrica an
- Page 13: OVERVIEW 3 associated with the exte
- Page 17 and 18: OVERVIEW 7 higher levels of biologi
- Page 19: OVERVIEW 9 of approaching this obje
- Page 23 and 24: Introduction In this report, rangel
- Page 25 and 26: INTRODUCTION 15 protein per hour of
- Page 27 and 28: INTRODUOTION 17 Moreover, grain cro
- Page 29 and 30: Sudan 66 million hectlln8 (permanen
- Page 31 and 32: Zambia Countrywide, Upper Zambesi (
- Page 33 and 34: People's Democratic Republic ofVeme
- Page 35 and 36: Saudi Arabia Countrywide 85 miIllon
- Page 37 and 38: Arghaniatan 30 million hectara Low
- Page 39 and 40: INTRODUCTION 29 knowledge, adaptati
- Page 41 and 42: 1 The Nature ofTropical and Subtrop
- Page 43 and 44: THE NATURE 0' TROPIOAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 45 and 46: THE NA.TURE OF TROP/OAL AND SUBTROP
- Page 47 and 48: THE NATURE OF TROPICAL AND SUBTROPI
- Page 49 and 50: TllB aoorAL aoNTEXT FOR RANGELAND I
- Page 51 and 52: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 53 and 54: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 55 and 56: THE SOOIAL CONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 57 and 58: T11B aOorAL OONTl:XT FOR RANQIILAND
- Page 59 and 60: THE SOorAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 61 and 62: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
- Page 63 and 64: THE SOOIAL OONTEXT FOR RANGELAND IM
OVERVIEW 5<br />
results, they must be supplemented by measures that bring immediate<br />
benefits. For example, if a protected area or watershed forest is<br />
threatened by wood-cutting for fuel, it will be necessary to provide<br />
an alternative source of fuel that can be used immediately.<br />
AN IGNORED RESOURCE<br />
Dry grazing l<strong>and</strong>s are largely ignored by governments <strong>and</strong> technical<br />
assistance agencies. Very little agricultural research funding<br />
goes to rangel<strong>and</strong> development. This stems partly from the limited<br />
political power of pastoralists or typical rangel<strong>and</strong> populations, <strong>and</strong><br />
partly from the high cost of traditional l<strong>and</strong> rehabilitation practices.<br />
AB a consequence of this neglect, opportunities have been lost<br />
to make vast marginal areas more productive for pastoral people<br />
<strong>and</strong> other rural populations. Further, deteriorating rangel<strong>and</strong>s contribute<br />
to flooding; when precipitation interception <strong>and</strong> infiltration<br />
are reduced, runoff correspondingly increases. The problem is compounded<br />
by the downstream effects of flooding, variously including<br />
damage to crope <strong>and</strong> settlements. Insufficient reeearch is aimed at<br />
finding ways to protect existing rangel<strong>and</strong> or identifying appropriate<br />
new crope that would complement livestock production. Agronomists<br />
the world over are taught the principles of agricultural l<strong>and</strong> management,<br />
but are unfamiliar with special rangel<strong>and</strong> techniques. The<br />
uninformed conversion of rangel<strong>and</strong> to cropl<strong>and</strong> has helped destroy<br />
rangel<strong>and</strong>s. For example, the moldboard plow destroys the surface<br />
vegetation <strong>and</strong> exposes thin, dry soil to erosion by wind <strong>and</strong> water.<br />
Clearly, abuse ofrangel<strong>and</strong>s has accelerated erosion, at times rapidly,<br />
at times slowly. AB soil erodes, sediments enter water courses <strong>and</strong><br />
river bottoms, estuaries, <strong>and</strong> deltas, which have become the sink for<br />
nutrient-laden sediments.<br />
CAUSES 01 ENVm.ONMENTAL DEGRADATION<br />
The causes ofl<strong>and</strong> degradation must be understood in developing<br />
a strategy for l<strong>and</strong> rehabilitation. Before costly methods are applied<br />
to promote range improvement, existing degradation forces should be<br />
identified <strong>and</strong> countered. Although the role of specific social forces<br />
is frequently unclear, devegetation-the progressive disappearance<br />
of plants from the l<strong>and</strong>-is generally the result of human activities:<br />
overexploitation by man <strong>and</strong> his animals.<br />
Degradation can begin with the depauperization of woodl<strong>and</strong>s