TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands TheImprovement ofTropical and Subtropical Rangelands
6 Grazing Management In recent years, there has been renewed interest in indigenous management systems, such as the hems system of the Near East (see case study 9). Such systems represented highly sophisticated adaptations to the peculiarities of particular environmental settings. The breakdown of these systems, often as a result of disorienting soci~ economic change during the colonial era, has resulted in widespread environmental degradation. While the principles upon which these systems were bued are still valid, changing environmental, socioec~ nomic, and political conditions present new challenges. In many areas ofthe world, the most promising approach to rangeland improvement is to complement the adaptations of local populations with relevant experience from analogous areas elsewhere. This chapter discusses grazing management from a Western, technical perspective. To meet the needs of forage-fed livestock and provide the other products and services from rangelands, these lands must be managed wisely. IT they are mismanaged to the extent that plants fail to provide sufficient soil cover, the species composition of the plant communities changes, reducing productivity and increasing soil erosion. Continued abuses can result in severe soil degradation. As indicated in the previous chapter, this does not imply, however, that all grazing is destructive. Some native plant communities have evolved over thousands of years under grazing by native animals. Not all major plant species have evolved under grazing pressure. 116
GRAZING MANAGEMENT 117 Species that are not adapted climatically should not be considered important components of the range ecosystems. Plants must be adapted for grazing or browsing by animals and for soil protection. The value of all plants growing in an area must be considered. Even small populations of a few species may contribute much to animal performance during a brief but critical part of the year. Range management involves both range improvement and grazing management practices. Range improvement generally has greater potential than grazing management for increasing production. Such practices as brush management, revegetation, and fertilization can increase range forage yields as much as tenfold. Manipulation of grazing time and intensity, on the other hand, usually results in relatively minor changes in range productivity. Rangeland revegetation by livestock manipulation alone is not as dramatic as mechanical revegetation, and it may take more time. On the other hand, it will likely be much less expensive and may be more in harmony with local cultures. Livestock manipulation may involve protection of areas from grazing, deferred grazing, seasonal grazing, rotation grazing, stocking rates, or intensity of grazing, or various combinations of these approaches. GRAZING MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS The application of ecological principles to range science often means maintaining or improving native stands of vegetation through grazing management. In addition, range managers may use a combination of extensive and intensive practices; for example, brush management combined with a grazing system, or revegetation and fertilization combined with a grazing system. A range manager can select the degree of intensity for a unit of rangeland depending on the potential of the sites within that unit; economic, social, and political factors; and available technology. Rangelands can be managed for various objectives, attempting to achieve a balance among management and social, economic, and environmental concerns. Range managers must be ftexible and innovative when planning operations on a range unit. Practices successful on one range unit may be le88 so on the next, or even unsuccessful on a unit nearby. No grazing scheme will eliminate the need to practice all economically appropriate range management techniques. No practice will produce the desired results if the range manager does not understand and believe in the principles involved, monitor the performance of units
- Page 75 and 76: THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 65 The basic p
- Page 77 and 78: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 67 can give a
- Page 79 and 80: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 69 evaluation.
- Page 81 and 82: THE EOONOMIO OONTEXT 71 fashion or
- Page 83 and 84: 4 Regional Resource Assessment The
- Page 85 and 86: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 75 onl
- Page 87 and 88: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 77 wil
- Page 89 and 90: REGIONAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT 79 spe
- Page 91 and 92: REGIONAL RESOUROB ASSB88MENT 81 Aqa
- Page 93 and 94: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 83 imp
- Page 95 and 96: REGIONAL RESOUROE AS8mJSMENT 85 60
- Page 97 and 98: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSB88JlENT 87 Ta
- Page 99 and 100: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 89 •
- Page 101 and 102: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 91 FIG
- Page 103 and 104: N r;; (L ~ C) o ~ -rv • 01 . •
- Page 105 and 106: REGIONAL RESOUROE ASSESSMENT 95 The
- Page 107 and 108: SITE EVALUATION 97 The natural proc
- Page 109 and 110: SIT8 EVALUATION 99 Climate is diffi
- Page 111 and 112: SITB EVALUATION 101 Instantaneous m
- Page 113 and 114: SITE EVALUATION 103 by field observ
- Page 115 and 116: SITE EVALUATION 105 dynamics ofan e
- Page 117 and 118: SITE EVALUATION 107 macbiuery at le
- Page 119 and 120: SIT8 EVALUATION 109 the better is t
- Page 121 and 122: SITE EVALUATION 111 Animal 7Jpe. Al
- Page 123 and 124: SITE EVALUATION 113 by component. M
- Page 125: SITE EVALUATION 115 National Raearc
- Page 129 and 130: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 119 the loss of
- Page 131 and 132: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 121 seed product
- Page 133 and 134: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 123 FIGURE 8-2 (
- Page 135 and 136: GRAZING MANAG8MENT 125 FIGURE 6-4 A
- Page 137 and 138: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 127 FIGURE 6-6 C
- Page 139 and 140: GRAZING MANAGDIBNT conditions by pr
- Page 141 and 142: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 181 FIGURE 6-9 (
- Page 143 and 144: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 133 The success
- Page 145 and 146: GRAZING MANAGEMENT IS5 a more nutri
- Page 147 and 148: GRAZING MANAGEMENT 137 flooded and,
- Page 149 and 150: 7 Rehabilitation Techniques ESTABLI
- Page 151 and 152: RBlIABILlTATlON TEOHNIQUES 141 to h
- Page 153 and 154: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 143 habit
- Page 155 and 156: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 145 Some
- Page 157 and 158: REHABlLlTATION TEOHNIQUES 147 Topog
- Page 159 and 160: REHABILn'ATlON TEOHNIQUES 149 years
- Page 161 and 162: RE1IABILrl'ATION TEOHNIQUES 151 are
- Page 163 and 164: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 153 FIGUR
- Page 165 and 166: RBllABILlTATlON TEOHNIQUES 155 Adva
- Page 167 and 168: 1UUIAB1LlTATION TE01IN1QUEB 157 Adv
- Page 169 and 170: REHABILITATION TEOHNIQUES 159 satis
- Page 171 and 172: REHAB1LlTATlON TECHNIQUES 161 Plant
- Page 173 and 174: RElIABlL1TATION TEOHNIQUES 163 FIGU
- Page 175 and 176: REHABHJTATION TECHNIQUES 165 FIGURE
6<br />
Grazing Management<br />
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in indigenous<br />
management systems, such as the hems system of the Near East (see<br />
case study 9). Such systems represented highly sophisticated adaptations<br />
to the peculiarities of particular environmental settings. The<br />
breakdown of these systems, often as a result of disorienting soci~<br />
economic change during the colonial era, has resulted in widespread<br />
environmental degradation. While the principles upon which these<br />
systems were bued are still valid, changing environmental, socioec~<br />
nomic, <strong>and</strong> political conditions present new challenges. In many areas<br />
ofthe world, the most promising approach to rangel<strong>and</strong> improvement<br />
is to complement the adaptations of local populations with relevant<br />
experience from analogous areas elsewhere. This chapter discusses<br />
grazing management from a Western, technical perspective.<br />
To meet the needs of forage-fed livestock <strong>and</strong> provide the other<br />
products <strong>and</strong> services from rangel<strong>and</strong>s, these l<strong>and</strong>s must be managed<br />
wisely. IT they are mismanaged to the extent that plants fail to<br />
provide sufficient soil cover, the species composition of the plant communities<br />
changes, reducing productivity <strong>and</strong> increasing soil erosion.<br />
Continued abuses can result in severe soil degradation. As indicated<br />
in the previous chapter, this does not imply, however, that all grazing<br />
is destructive. Some native plant communities have evolved over<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s of years under grazing by native animals.<br />
Not all major plant species have evolved under grazing pressure.<br />
116