Alphonse Kambu - UNU-IAS
Alphonse Kambu - UNU-IAS
Alphonse Kambu - UNU-IAS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
21 st Pacific Science Congress<br />
Strengthening Linkages between<br />
Science and Policy<br />
Issues and Concerns about Biomedical<br />
Research involving Indigenous and Local<br />
Communities: Hagahai of Papua New Guinea<br />
<strong>Alphonse</strong> <strong>Kambu</strong>
Overview<br />
1. Merits of Biomedical<br />
Research<br />
2. Issues and Concerns<br />
3. Hagahai Case<br />
4. Lessons for the Future<br />
Source: PNG IMR
1. Merits of Biomedical Research<br />
• Finding solutions to medical<br />
problems, curbing chronic<br />
diseases (HIV/AIDS, malaria,<br />
etc) and improving health care.<br />
• Drug discovery.<br />
• Contribution to knowledge base.<br />
• Sharing of results for academic<br />
and educational purposes.<br />
• Achievement of UN Millennium<br />
Development Goals.<br />
• Intentions of biomedical<br />
research are good.<br />
Source: PNG IMR
2. Issues and Concerns<br />
• Sensitivity of the nature of research<br />
– Deals with humans<br />
• Ethical dimensions<br />
– Embarks upon issues such as life<br />
• Religious reasons<br />
– What are the religious views and are they considered in biomedical<br />
research?<br />
• Social and cultural aspects<br />
– What do the social and cultural norms say and are they being<br />
consulted?<br />
• Information Strategy<br />
– Prior Informed Consent<br />
– Privacy<br />
– Ownership of information<br />
• Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Do the right kind of laws and policies exist and are they being<br />
consulted?
3. Hagahai Case<br />
• Background<br />
– Hagahai Tribe of Papua New<br />
Guinea (PNG).<br />
– PNG Institute of Medical<br />
Research (IMR): Dr. Carol<br />
Jenkins.<br />
– 1995 US Patent No. 5,397,696<br />
involving the “human t-<br />
lymphotropic virus” (HTLV-I).<br />
– Patent listed Dr. Jenkins and 4<br />
other US Government<br />
researchers for the “invention” .<br />
– Patent revoked after global and<br />
domestic controversies, but the<br />
cell is being still kept alive in the<br />
library at NIH despite request<br />
from Dr. Jenkins to destroy it.<br />
Source: PNG IMR
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Why the controversy<br />
– Communication strategy<br />
– Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Social and cultural reasons<br />
– Religious and ethical reasons
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Communication Strategy<br />
– Prior Informed Consent<br />
• Purpose and process should be<br />
CLEAR, SIMPLE and<br />
UNDERSTANDABLE to subjects of<br />
research<br />
– Contents of communication: nature<br />
of activities, process, pros and cons,<br />
– Wider consultation, discussion and<br />
dialogue among stakeholders<br />
– Right of stakeholders and duty of<br />
researchers, research institutions, etc.<br />
– Duty of researchers and research<br />
institutions to inform should not be<br />
perceived as a burden, but a positive<br />
step<br />
• Helps educate others about oneself<br />
and the nature of activities and<br />
clarifies doubts<br />
• Helps secure public approval and trust<br />
– Ownership of information<br />
• Patents<br />
Source: PNG IMR
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Lack of realistic understanding of<br />
direct benefits of gene patenting on<br />
drug and other benefits for the<br />
majority<br />
– Public versus private interests in<br />
research<br />
– Drugs on the market are<br />
prohibitively priced and cannot be<br />
afforded by many (40 million people<br />
in the world living with HIV/AIDS;<br />
closing down of health centers due<br />
to lack of essential drugs for malaria,<br />
typhoid, pneumonia, etc in rural<br />
areas of PNG)<br />
– Can another patent evolving from<br />
biomedical research being<br />
conducted on poor indigenous<br />
communities really help solve their<br />
health problems and the broader<br />
majority when 85 % of people in<br />
PNG are poor subsistence farmers<br />
who are not able to afford basic<br />
drugs?<br />
– Good intentions of biomedical<br />
research is put to test<br />
Source: PNG IMR
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Why the controversy<br />
– Communication strategy<br />
– Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Social and cultural reasons<br />
– Religious and ethical reasons
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Were there concrete and clear policies and laws on the issue? Have<br />
the laws and policies been considered?<br />
– Non-existent of specific laws and policies<br />
• Constitution of PNG<br />
– Fundamental Human Rights and Freedom<br />
• Right to Life and the enjoyment of it and not to deprive it (Section 35).<br />
• Patenting of information derived from genes, the building blocks of life,<br />
is an issue that can be directly linked with the right to life and its<br />
deprivation.<br />
• The very act of taking patents on information derived from genes can<br />
interfere with the right to life in that patents have a potential to hinder<br />
the free use of the information and its source (genes and DNA)<br />
– Exploitation of the silence or ambiguity of PNG laws<br />
• Institute of Medical Research Act (1967) establishes the PNG IMR and<br />
provides for the conduct of research in any field of medical science or<br />
biology, anthropological and sociological aspects of health and illhealth<br />
and public health in general.<br />
• Silent on a case such as the Hagahai Patent Case or patenting of<br />
results in general
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Why the controversy<br />
– Communication strategy<br />
– Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Social and cultural reasons<br />
– Religious and ethical reasons
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Social and cultural reason<br />
– Do cultural practices and ideologies allow for<br />
ownership of genes, life, DNA? Have cultural and<br />
social norms and practices of the indigenous<br />
community been observed?<br />
• Customary Laws and Practices (Kastam)<br />
– Norms, principles, values, wisdom and processes in<br />
both formal and informal institutions, and observed<br />
by 85% of the PNG population<br />
– Do not speak directly of life patents, but very<br />
important to consult when determining matters of<br />
public interest or common concern such as patenting<br />
of information associated with a gene which is a<br />
common heritage of mankind<br />
– Rule or Principle of Communitarianism<br />
– Consultation<br />
– Transparency<br />
– Consensus<br />
– PNG Ways (Preamble of the Constitution)<br />
• National affairs or development to be conducted<br />
through PNG Ways<br />
– Patenting of information derived from the common<br />
good should have involved wider stakeholder<br />
consultation through PNG Ways<br />
– The Hagahai Patent Case failed to consider the reality<br />
of the socio-cultural practices and laws in PNG and as<br />
such was inconsistent with Kastam and the spirit of<br />
the Constitution<br />
Source: PNG IMR
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Why the controversy<br />
– Communication strategy<br />
– Policy and legal grounds<br />
– Social and cultural reasons<br />
– Religious and ethical reasons
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Religious and ethical reasons<br />
– Have the religious principles and<br />
practices in the country being considered?<br />
– Can human genes, the building blocks of<br />
life be owned under these principles?<br />
• Disregard for Christian faith<br />
• PNG Constitution declares the itself a<br />
Christian country<br />
• 90% of the population in PNG upholds<br />
the faith<br />
• The Christian faith preaches that humans<br />
and body parts (including genes) are ends<br />
in themselves and not means to ends;<br />
humans and their body parts in their<br />
entirety are God’s creation and therefore<br />
sacred, and should not be meddled with<br />
or commodified<br />
Source: PNG IMR
3. Hagahai Case, cont’d<br />
• Latest developments in PNG<br />
• Patents and Industrial Designs Act (2000) Section 2<br />
– “…“invention” means an idea of an inventor, which permits in<br />
practice the solution of a specific problem in the field of technology<br />
and may be, or may relate to, a product or process, but does not<br />
include – (a) a discovery, scientific theory or mathematical<br />
method; or (b) a scheme, rule or method for …”<br />
• Explanatory Notes and Guide on Filing New Patent and<br />
Industrial Designs Application<br />
– “…It should be noted also that the essentially biological<br />
processes cannot be patented. Microbiological processes,<br />
however, are patentable. This means that an invention that has very<br />
little “human input” but which generally allows natural biological<br />
processes cannot be protected. Essentially biological processes would<br />
include the art of cloning or simply nurturing plants or animals.<br />
Similarly human genes (occurring naturally) cannot be<br />
patented.”
4. Lessons for the Future<br />
• Significant lessons<br />
– Emphasis on a holistic approach in undertaking biomedical R&D<br />
(moral, ethical, legal and socio-cultural dimensions).<br />
– Communication strategy that facilitates free flow of information<br />
that is adequate, simple and comprehensible among all<br />
stakeholders to enhance understanding and elicit trust and<br />
minimize controversy<br />
• PIC Procedures to be followed<br />
– Looking beyond the immediate and direct laws, principles and<br />
norms and policies associated with biomedical R&D<br />
– Observing socio-cultural norms and practices of the land and<br />
people when conducting biomedical research<br />
– Application of the precautionary principle to weigh the costs and<br />
benefits<br />
– Strengthening the link between science, policy and other disciplines
THANK YOU<br />
Source: PNG IMR