Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a
Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a
III RESEARCH METHODS Instruments The data were gathered employing the same questionnaires and inventories as two years ago (Tenjović, Knežević, Opačić et al. 2001) except that the general questionnaire was modified by exclusion of some questions and by inclusion of several new questions related to the PrIDPs` position on return to homeland. Therefore, the following instruments were included in the research: 1. General Questionnaire designed by the IAN research team provided data on the sociodemographic characteristics of the examinees (gender, age, nationality, marital status, number of family members, number of children, type of the place of origin /town-village/), their educational level, occupation and employability (working ability), their current financial and living conditions (employment, monthly income per family member, type of accommodation in exile, need for humanitarian aid, satisfaction with the humanitarian aid received, self-estimate of current living condition), and their current mental health status (need to talk with a professional due to psychological difficulties, use of tranquillisers, self-estimate of current psychological condition). The separate section of the general questionnaire was designed to explore examinees' views related to return and to the factors that have impact on decision making process about the return to home area (interest for events in the home area, most frequently used sources of information about homeland, frequency of visits to the homeland, maintenance of contacts with persons of the same as well as other nationalities who live in the place of origin of the displacees, personal readiness to return, conditions required for return, having a plan to return in the near future, estimation of the importance of certain conditions the fulfilling of which could facilitate the process of reaching a decision on return to homeland). 2. Life event check list (LECL), designed by the IAN research team, is employed for assessing the extensity of exposure to extremely stressful life events. It comprises a list of 17 extremely stressful life events. The examinee checks each event according to the following scale: "It happened to me", "I have witnessed it", "I have learned from somebody else’s experience", "I am not certain" or "It is irrelevant for me". 6
3. Impact of event scale (IES) (Horowitz, Wilner & Alvarez, 1979) a self-report instrument for assessing severity of posttraumatic distress. The examinee checks each item on a fourpoint scale (“not at all”, “rarely”, “sometimes”, “often”), indicating in that way how frequently he had the experiences described by the item during the last seven days. The responses to each item are measured by 0 (“not at all”), 1, 3 or 5 (“often”) for the frequency categories, respectively. The scores of intrusion, avoidance and total score of posttraumatic distress are obtained as a sum of measured responses. 4. Symptom check list- SCL-90-R -a self-report inventory comprising 90 items for the assessment of current psychological symptom pattern, current distress and global psychopathological status (Derogatis, 1983). The examinee rates each item on a fivepoint scale (from “not at all” to “extremely) according to the degree of distress during the last seven days. The nine symptom dimensions (Somatisation, Obsessive-Compulsive, Interpersonal Sensitivity, Depression, Anxiety, Hostility, Phobic Anxiety, Paranoid Ideation and Psychoticism) and certain global indices of distress can be derived from responses to the items. In this research Global Severity Index (GSI) was employed as a measure of global distress or psychopathological status. 5. NEOFFI personality inventory - is composed of 60 items (Costa & McCrae, 1992). The examinee responds by choosing one answer on a five-point scale (from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree"). NEOFFI was used in this research for the assessment of five personality traits describing personality in accordance with the currently most widely accepted Big-Five personality model: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (Digman, 1990). Sample To enable comparison with the data obtained on the PrIDPs two years ago, the sampling plan included gender, education level and nationality as the stratification factors. The IAN team members randomly selected sample units during the regular field contacts with internally displaced persons from the Prizren area, paying great attention to stratification factors in the sampling plan. With regard to the purpose of this research and the fact that the data were gathered through questionnaires, only persons over 14 were included in the sample. The final sample selected in that way consisted of 391 Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) from Prizren (and the surrounding 7
- Page 1 and 2: INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS from t
- Page 3 and 4: I INTRODUCTION After the formal end
- Page 5 and 6: needs, mental health status, and th
- Page 7: II RESEARCH GOALS Research goals, i
- Page 11 and 12: IV RESULTS By this research it was
- Page 13 and 14: and relatively higher proportion of
- Page 15 and 16: Cramer's V-coefficient, which very
- Page 17 and 18: 2002-sample the percentage has rise
- Page 19 and 20: B. Mental health status of the Priz
- Page 21 and 22: Table 6: Means (and standard deviat
- Page 23 and 24: Average results obtained from the 2
- Page 25 and 26: As it was explained in the sample d
- Page 27 and 28: consequence of differences in some
- Page 29 and 30: from this group did not say precise
- Page 31 and 32: to certain researches the percentag
- Page 33 and 34: IV CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- Page 35 and 36: It would be very useful to further
- Page 37: Vlajković, J. (2000a). Psihološki
III RESEARCH METHODS<br />
Instruments<br />
The data were gathered employing the same questionnaires and<br />
inventories as two years ago (Tenjović, Knežević, Opačić et al. 2001)<br />
except that the general questionnaire was modified by exclusion of<br />
some questions and by inclusion of several new questions related to<br />
the PrIDPs` position on return to homeland. Therefore, the following<br />
instruments were included in the research:<br />
1. General Questionnaire designed by the <strong>IAN</strong> research team<br />
provided data on the sociodemographic characteristics of the<br />
examinees (gender, age, nationality, marital status, number of<br />
family members, number of children, type of the place of origin<br />
/town-village/), their educational level, occupation and<br />
employability (working ability), their current financial and living<br />
conditions (employment, monthly income per family member, type<br />
of accommodation in exile, need for humanitarian aid, satisfaction<br />
with the humanitarian aid received, self-estimate of current living<br />
condition), and their current mental health status (need to talk<br />
with a professional due to psychological difficulties, use of<br />
tranquillisers, self-estimate of current psychological condition).<br />
The separate section of the general questionnaire was designed to<br />
explore examinees' views related to return and to the factors that<br />
have impact on decision making process about the return to home<br />
area (interest for events in the home area, most frequently used<br />
sources of information about homeland, frequency of visits to the<br />
homeland, maintenance of contacts with persons of the same as<br />
well as other nationalities who live in the place of origin of the<br />
displacees, personal readiness to return, conditions required for<br />
return, having a plan to return in the near future, estimation of the<br />
importance of certain conditions the fulfilling of which could<br />
facilitate the process of reaching a decision on return to<br />
homeland).<br />
2. Life event check list (LECL), designed by the <strong>IAN</strong><br />
research team, is employed for assessing the extensity of<br />
exposure to extremely stressful life events. It comprises a list of<br />
17 extremely stressful life events. The examinee checks each<br />
event according to the following scale: "It happened to me", "I<br />
have witnessed it", "I have learned from somebody else’s<br />
experience", "I am not certain" or "It is irrelevant for me".<br />
6