Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a

Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a Download book (PDF file 742 kB) - IAN-a

17.01.2014 Views

losses, and later with the necessity to bring crucial decisions regarding the future life (Vlajković, 2000b). Besides all this, in the last two years IDPs from Kosovo and Metohija were faced with the transition changes of the current system in their own country, disappearance of old institutions and creation of new ones, i.e. the so-called birth of “democracy” on the ruins of war, previous regime and international isolation. For almost four years of their life in exile the Internally Displaced Persons from the Prizren area of Kosovo (hereinafter identified as PrIDPs) have dwelled in a vicious circle between the wish to return to the homeland and awareness that the return is not objectively possible at the present time. The non-existence of clear legislative and, which is far more important, guaranties for personal safety of the returnees to Kosovo and Metohija really applicable on the field, the climate of insecurity that is still a part of everyday life in places they were exiled from, actual impossibility to freely access property, openly manifested reluctance of the extremists within the Albanian majority to accept tolerance and reconciliation with the returnees, are obstacles for the return of the non-Albanian population to their homeland that they were forced to leave almost four years ago. The right to return, which is not only a wish of the great majority of them but also one of their basic human rights, is at present only a fictional right. The situation in Kosovo and Metohija has not been changing in a direction favourable for them: this area is under the international administration of UNMIK, with very limited freedom of movement for the non-Albanian population that lives in strictly protected enclaves. This is how the U.S. Committee for Refugees describes the current situation in Kosovo: "Despite failing to show significant popular support among ethnic Albanians in Kosovo during October 2000 municipal elections...ethnic Albanian militants mounted well-organized acts of violence and intimidation against minorities. Violence and threats were directed particularly at would-be minority returnees to Kosovo... The threat of violence continued to prevent the return of most displaced Serbs and other minorities, including Roma, Ashkalis, and “Egyptians” (RAE) to their homes in Kosovo... With an estimated unemployment rate of more than 60 percent, and continuing crime, political instability, and ethnic polarization, Kosovo was slow to recover from the full-scale armed conflict of 1999. Both ethnic Albanian and ethnic Serb militants strove to consolidate the ethnic divisions that they had created after the deployment of NATO troops, called KFOR (for Kosovo Force)...."(cited from the URL: http://www.refugees.org /world /countryrpt/europe /yugoslavia.htm) In 2000 IAN Research Team conducted a research on the sample of 1630 PrIDPs, with the main purpose to provide useful information on socio-demographic, educational and professional characteristics of the Prizren area IDPs, on their living conditions, aid 2

needs, mental health status, and their position on return to the homeland (Tenjović, Knežević, Opačić et al. 2001). Data obtained through this research showed favourable educational and professional structure of the PrIDP population, as well as a high business competence and marked readiness for credited entrepreneurship in this group of expellees. On the other hand, the data clearly showed rather unfavourable living conditions of the PrIDPs in exile (high rate of unemployment, feeling of complete dependence on humanitarian aid with, at the same time, very prominent dissatisfaction with the received humanitarian aid). It also revealed a disastrous status of their mental health (prevailing sense of deteriorating current mental health condition compared with their mental health condition prior to exile, extremely high level of intrusive component of posttraumatic response syndrome and very pronounced symptoms of anxiety, paranoid ideation and somatisations). Since October 2000, after the fall of the Slobodan Milošević regime, together with the creation of democratic institutions after a decade of isolation, FR Yugoslavia has been struggling for the quickest possible recovery into the international community. A new system that is gradually being established in Serbia is, in a way, a great chance for opening new possibilities for repatriation, i.e. return to homeland with the assistance of the international community, or integration of internally displaced persons into the new environment. Every type of assistance, both in possible reaching a decision to return to the homeland and in reaching a decision to permanently remain in the new environment and integrate into it, includes good knowledge of the current status and personal views of the group that the assistance is intended for. Two years have past after the previous research conducted by the IAN research Team (supported by Danish Secretariat for Peace and Stability /FRESTA/ and European Commission) whose goal was to find out more about living conditions and mental health status of IDPs from the Prizren area. This time period is long enough for the changes to occur in specific populations such as the population of PrIDPs. Hence, the main purpose of the investigation, whose results are reported in this text, was a) to explore current living conditions of the Prizren area IDPs (PrIDPs), their current mental health status and their personal views regarding return to home area and b) to compare current data with the data gathered two years ago within the same population. It was not possible, however, to gather data by examining exactly the same persons as two years ago. Instead, we have decided to use a new sample that would be as similar as possible regarding the important characteristics to the sample from the year 2000 (and that could be rightly assumed to represent the population of those PrIDPs who are literate and older than 14). In this way we wanted to reach timely and accurate information on possible changes in the living conditions, mental health status and position regarding the return to home area 3

losses, and later with the necessity to bring crucial decisions<br />

regarding the future life (Vlajković, 2000b).<br />

Besides all this, in the last two years IDPs from Kosovo and<br />

Metohija were faced with the transition changes of the current system<br />

in their own country, disappearance of old institutions and creation of<br />

new ones, i.e. the so-called birth of “democracy” on the ruins of war,<br />

previous regime and international isolation.<br />

For almost four years of their life in exile the Internally<br />

Displaced Persons from the Prizren area of Kosovo (hereinafter<br />

identified as PrIDPs) have dwelled in a vicious circle between the<br />

wish to return to the homeland and awareness that the return is not<br />

objectively possible at the present time. The non-existence of clear<br />

legislative and, which is far more important, guaranties for personal<br />

safety of the returnees to Kosovo and Metohija really applicable on<br />

the field, the climate of insecurity that is still a part of everyday life in<br />

places they were exiled from, actual impossibility to freely access<br />

property, openly manifested reluctance of the extremists within the<br />

Albanian majority to accept tolerance and reconciliation with the<br />

returnees, are obstacles for the return of the non-Albanian population<br />

to their homeland that they were forced to leave almost four years<br />

ago. The right to return, which is not only a wish of the great<br />

majority of them but also one of their basic human rights, is at<br />

present only a fictional right. The situation in Kosovo and Metohija<br />

has not been changing in a direction favourable for them: this area is<br />

under the international administration of UNMIK, with very limited<br />

freedom of movement for the non-Albanian population that lives in<br />

strictly protected enclaves. This is how the U.S. Committee for<br />

Refugees describes the current situation in Kosovo:<br />

"Despite failing to show significant popular support among ethnic<br />

Albanians in Kosovo during October 2000 municipal elections...ethnic<br />

Albanian militants mounted well-organized acts of violence and<br />

intimidation against minorities. Violence and threats were directed<br />

particularly at would-be minority returnees to Kosovo... The threat of<br />

violence continued to prevent the return of most displaced Serbs and<br />

other minorities, including Roma, Ashkalis, and “Egyptians” (RAE) to<br />

their homes in Kosovo... With an estimated unemployment rate of<br />

more than 60 percent, and continuing crime, political instability, and<br />

ethnic polarization, Kosovo was slow to recover from the full-scale<br />

armed conflict of 1999. Both ethnic Albanian and ethnic Serb<br />

militants strove to consolidate the ethnic divisions that they had<br />

created after the deployment of NATO troops, called KFOR (for<br />

Kosovo Force)...."(cited from the URL: http://www.refugees.org<br />

/world /countryrpt/europe /yugoslavia.htm)<br />

In 2000 <strong>IAN</strong> Research Team conducted a research on the<br />

sample of 1630 PrIDPs, with the main purpose to provide useful<br />

information on socio-demographic, educational and professional<br />

characteristics of the Prizren area IDPs, on their living conditions, aid<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!