- Page 1 and 2: FINAL REPORT Impact of the Mixed-In
- Page 3 and 4: Executive Summary Public housing in
- Page 5 and 6: Finding 2 Evidence Finding 3 Eviden
- Page 7 and 8: Finding 4 Evidence Average rent pai
- Page 9 and 10: who received housing vouchers had o
- Page 11 and 12: them much more flexibility to choos
- Page 13 and 14: Comparing Grady to other communitie
- Page 15 and 16: Section 1 Purpose and Background Pu
- Page 17 and 18: In exchange for MTW designation, HU
- Page 19 and 20: Total 48 48 71 These radical change
- Page 21 and 22: Section 2 AHA’s Rationale for Rev
- Page 23 and 24: During focus group interviews, long
- Page 25 and 26: AHA’s Mixed-income Revitalization
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 6 Veranda at Auburn Pointe,
- Page 29: To be eligible to move back into a
- Page 33 and 34: the city. The development was also
- Page 35 and 36: Section 4 Methodology and Definitio
- Page 37 and 38: Antoine Graves Annex (Graves Annex)
- Page 39 and 40: 39 | P a g e repeated measurements
- Page 41 and 42: Section 5 2004 Baseline Characteris
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 9 Number of Householders and
- Page 45 and 46: G2 consisted of Antoine Graves and
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 13 Number of Householders an
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 16 Household income characte
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 19 Household Employment Char
- Page 53 and 54: single-family home was $193,095 and
- Page 55 and 56: Section 6 Change in the Type of Hou
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 27 Figure 28 57 | P a g e
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 30b CHANGE IN TYPE OF ASSIST
- Page 61 and 62: Section 7 Change in the Indicators
- Page 63 and 64: Figure 34 HOUSEHOLD INCOME FOR ALL
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 37 AVERAGE RENT PAYMENTS FOR
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 40 Figure 41 AVERAGE PUBLIC
- Page 69 and 70: Section 8 Impact of CATALYST on Emp
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 44 Figure 44 EMPLOYMENT RATE
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 46 AVERAGE HOURS WORKED PER
- Page 75 and 76: public assistance have a much lower
- Page 77 and 78: Correlated Data Summary Number of L
- Page 79 and 80: Tests of Model Effects Type III Wal
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 51 EARNINGS OF HOUSEHOLDERS
- Page 83 and 84:
Other Services Rehabilitation and C
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 51 Figure 52 NEIGHBORHOOD PO
- Page 87 and 88:
percent of the population with only
- Page 89 and 90:
89 | P a g e Map 1: Location of Ori
- Page 91 and 92:
Poverty Deconcentration One effecti
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 58 POVERTY RATE OF ORIGIN AN
- Page 95 and 96:
clearly how these families made a s
- Page 97 and 98:
MAP 6 Map 7 illustrates that in 201
- Page 99 and 100:
the CAI scores at the point of orig
- Page 101 and 102:
Householders who are in a Port Out
- Page 103 and 104:
Case Processing Summary N Percent C
- Page 105 and 106:
o In 2009 there were 84 HOHs who pa
- Page 107 and 108:
A minority of householders moved in
- Page 109 and 110:
A majority of persons moved out of
- Page 111 and 112:
Total Participants 97 94 69 Partici
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 63 Number of Years since Mov
- Page 115 and 116:
Regarding the difficulty of finding
- Page 117 and 118:
Figures 68, 69 and 70 record indivi
- Page 119 and 120:
Figures 71, 72, and 73 record respo
- Page 121 and 122:
Figures 74 and 75 record responses
- Page 123 and 124:
Figure 77 Feeling about Children's
- Page 125 and 126:
4. When you first heard you had to
- Page 127 and 128:
4. What other kind of help did you
- Page 129 and 130:
participants who have moved multipl
- Page 131 and 132:
• Apartments: too small, mold/mil
- Page 133 and 134:
o Assigned counselor Housing enviro
- Page 135 and 136:
11.20.08 13h Demolition and mov
- Page 137 and 138:
Most of the participants reported r
- Page 139 and 140:
environment. However, householders