16.01.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An Hα approach to the evolution<br />

of the galaxy population<br />

of the Universe<br />

Jesús s Gallego<br />

Universidad Complutense Madrid<br />

S. Pascual, V. Villar UCM<br />

P.G. Pérez-González, J. Zamorano UCM<br />

D.C. Koo, K. Noeske<br />

Lick<br />

20/10/08 Jesús Gallego - Astrofísica UCM 1


Galaxy formation and evolution<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 2


Observational tests: The cosmic SFR density<br />

Madau et al (1996)<br />

MNRAS 283, 1388<br />

<br />

Observational result<br />

Lilly et al 1996<br />

UV for CFRS survey<br />

Epoch of maximum SF at z~1<br />

<br />

Combination of surveys<br />

Hα local<br />

UV at intermediate z<br />

UV from the HDF-N<br />

¡¡ 1170 citations !!<br />

<br />

More than 3000 papers SFRd<br />

in the abstract<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 3


Galaxy evolution: SFR tracers<br />

SFR [M/yr] = K • Luminosity<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

U band<br />

UV continuum<br />

Hydrogen recombination lines<br />

Forbidden lines<br />

Far-infrared<br />

1.4 GHz Radio<br />

R=Light / SFR<br />

R STANDARD<br />

:<br />

- Salpeter IMF, Z <br />

- Mmax=100M <br />

- A V<br />

=1, dust screen<br />

Charlot et al 98<br />

Local SFR calibrations valid for high<br />

redshift? (see Cardiel+03, Moustakas+06)


Galaxy evolution: SFR tracers<br />

SFR [M/yr] = K • Luminosity<br />

LeFloch&Mirabel 04


The multi-λ Lilly-Madau plot<br />

‣ UV based observed with GALEX<br />

‣ Estimated UV corrected<br />

‣ Far-IR (see Pérez talk !!)<br />

‣ Hα based<br />

Schiminovich et al 05<br />

Transition epoch Zp ~ 1-2<br />

β ~ 2-4<br />

α ~ 0 ??<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 6


Downsizing since z


New populations at 1.5


Open questions<br />

How the overall picture depends on SFR tracers?<br />

Why the SFR density is flat for z>1?<br />

Are we missing a significative fraction of objects?<br />

What is the role of the AGNs at different epochs?<br />

Are we really measuring downsizing?<br />

What are the new populations of galaxies?<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 9


The Hα approach<br />

Samples of Hα-selected star-forming galaxies<br />

Hα as an excellent CURRENT SFR tracer, AGN sensible<br />

Same rest-frame selection criteria<br />

Narrow-band Total line fluxes. No aperture corrections<br />

Line selected <br />

‣ Well defined volume<br />

‣ Complete and representative samples<br />

‣ Wide coverage in the parameters space<br />

Known fields<br />

Multi-wavelength complementary data<br />

t<br />

m<br />

2<br />

σ( Hα)<br />

L( Hα) = hνHα<br />

φ( m) ψ( t) dmdt N<br />

Lyman( m)<br />

σ ∫∫<br />

B<br />

t−tm m<br />

1<br />

SFR Hα<br />

(M <br />

yr -1 ) = L Hα<br />

/ 1.27 x 10 34 W (Kennicutt 1998)


The Hα approach<br />

Evolution of the Hα-based SFR<br />

Hα to compare with UV, FIR… Universes<br />

Properties of galaxies, quenching masses<br />

Hα complementary to FIR to compute total SFRs


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

Schmidt 80/120 cm<br />

IIIa-F + RG630 filter<br />

471.4 191 galaxies<br />

z < 0.045 EW (Ha) > 20 Å.<br />

“Little spirals”, M* ~10 10 Mo Gallego 97, Izquierdo et al 08


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

SFR local density<br />

<br />

<br />

191 galaxies, z


Narrow-band surveys<br />

• Objects selected by their color excess<br />

m A -m E > µ (m A -m E ) + n σ x σ (m A -m E )<br />

• Several apertures<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 14


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 15


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

z=0.24 8200Å NB @ I Cuasi-local Pascual+01,05<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 16


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

z=0.24 8200Å NB @ I Cuasi-local Pascual+01,05<br />

z=0.40 9200Å NB @ z Transition epoch Pascual+07<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 17


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego+95<br />

z=0.24 8200Å NB @ I Cuasi-local Pascual+01,05<br />

z=0.40 9200Å NB @ z Transition epoch Pascual+07<br />

z=0.81 1.19μm NB @ J Most-of-the-fun Villar+08<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 18


Redshifts considered<br />

z=0.02 6563Å ObjPrism UCM survey Gallego 95<br />

z=0.24 8200Å NB @ I Cuasi-local Pascual 01,05<br />

z=0.40 9200Å NB @ z Transition epoch Pascual 07<br />

z=0.81 1.19μm NB @ J Most-of-the-fun Villar 07<br />

z=2.20 NB&MOS @ K New populations GOYA<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 19


Hα@z=0.24: SFRdensity<br />

Pascual et al 2001; 2007<br />

CAHA 2.2m &<br />

INT 2.5m<br />

~1 sqr deg<br />

8200 Å<br />

0.5% NB<br />

F > 4 10 -16<br />

erg/s/cm2<br />

EW(Hα+[NII])<br />

> 20 Å<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 20


Hα@z=0.24: Disk-like objects<br />

Pascual et al 09<br />

WHT 4.2m<br />

~20 objects<br />

Phot-z’s<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 21


Hα@z=0.24: Moderately massive disks<br />

Pascual et al 09<br />

[NII]λ6584<br />

Hα<br />

[NII]λ6548<br />

Local<br />

Virial and rotational masses ~10 10 Mo<br />

Small fraction of AGNs or ULIRGs


Hα@z=0.24: Contaminants<br />

• Ugriz for Phot-z’s<br />

• Candidates<br />

‘Contaminants’<br />

Hα ELGs [OIII]5007 [OII]3727<br />

z=0.24 z=0.63 z=0.84<br />

Pascual et al 2005<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 23


[OIII]5007 Contaminants @ z=0.6<br />

66 arcsec<br />

r=22.5<br />

g-r=0.02<br />

r=22.3<br />

g-r=0.75


Contaminants<br />

• 2 objects are selected at high redshift by their flux excess<br />

in other lines different than Hα<br />

GSS-1-1249<br />

[OIII]λλ 4959,5007 a z~1.4<br />

GSS-1-1200<br />

[OII] λ3727 a z~2.17<br />

Their selection may imply more luminous objects at high z<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 25


Hα @ z=0.40<br />

INT 2.5m<br />

~1 sqr deg<br />

9200 Å<br />

0.5% NB<br />

ELAIS-N1<br />

Sa95, Sa114<br />

z=0, Gallego95<br />

<br />

<br />

10 1.9 0.2 h 3 Mpc 3<br />

L 10 41.9 0.05 h 2 erg s 1<br />

1.3<br />

<br />

z=0.24, Pascual 01<br />

<br />

Spectroscopy still pending


Hα @ z=0.40: SFRdensity<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 27


Hα @ z=0.8<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

CAHA3.5m / Ω-2000<br />

1,21 μm narrow-band filter, J band<br />

~10 4 s exposures<br />

Groth strip, GOODS-N<br />

0.31 sqr deg<br />

165 objects<br />

J<br />

NB<br />

HST extended<br />

Groth strip<br />

WHT4.2m / INGRID<br />

1,18 μm NB, J band<br />

~10 4 s exposures<br />

Groth strip<br />

32 sqr arcmin<br />

~15 objects<br />

J<br />

NB


Photo-redshifts<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

Sextractor stellarity<br />

BzK criterium (Daddi+04)<br />

IRAC and nIR criteria (Eisenhardt+04)<br />

Photometric redshifts from<br />

Pérez-González+05,08<br />

BRI criteria (Fujita+03)<br />

z < 0.7<br />

B-R C<br />

z > 0.7<br />

R C -I C


Extinction correction<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

F dust /F FUV as a indicator<br />

of the dust obscuration<br />

(Buat+05)<br />

Fdust from SPITZER<br />

FFUV from GALEX<br />

A(FUV) f[ log(F dust /F FUV )]<br />

A(Hα)z=0.02 = 1.0 mag<br />

A(Hα)z=0.84 = 1.5 mag


Hα Luminosity Function @ z=0.8<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

FUV ~ 0.4 M <br />

yr -1<br />

Hα ~ 0.7 M <br />

yr -1<br />

MIPS ~ 8.0 M <br />

yr -1<br />

0.7


Hα@z=0.8: SFR Hα-based excess?<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The star formation<br />

rate density is<br />

0.17 M <br />

yr -1 Mpc 3 ,<br />

~10-15 times<br />

higher than the<br />

local one.<br />

SFRd Hα<br />

evolution:<br />

∝ (1+z) β<br />

β=3.8±0.5<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 32


Hα@z=0.8: Field-to-field variance<br />

Villar et al 08<br />

Field to field<br />

variances ~3x<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 33


Hα-based UCM Madau plot<br />

Villar et al 08


Hα-based Madau plot<br />

Villar et al 08


UV,Hα, FIR-based Madau plot<br />

Villar et al 08


On the nature of Hα @ z=0.8<br />

Most of objects disk-like in HST images<br />

LIRGs found by Pérez-González ‘05<br />

5 arcsec<br />

10 kpc<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 37


On the nature of Hα @ z=0.8<br />

Small fraction of compacts<br />

Less than expected (~30%) of<br />

Major mergers<br />

ULIRGs<br />

AGNs<br />

5 arcsec<br />

10 kpc<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 38


Hα @ z=0.8 IRAC data for stellar masses<br />

Phot-z’s (including Spitzer)<br />

SED fitting, stellar masses<br />

GSS073_4662<br />

B F606W I<br />

NB1,18μ IRAC3,6 μ IRAC4,2 μ<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 39


On the nature of Hα @ z=0.8<br />

Keck optical spectroscopy<br />

V. Villar thesis @ UCM<br />

DEEP-2<br />

Keck I y II<br />

LRIS/DEIMOS<br />

[OII]3727, Hβ, [OIII]5007<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 40


EW(OII) vs. M B<br />

Disk-like spectroscopic properties<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 41


Hα@z=0.8: Massive systems<br />

O Local<br />

M~ K R e σ 2 ~10 11 Mo, Evidence of downsizing


On the nature of Hα @ z=0.8<br />

A. Sánchez thesis @ UCM<br />

WHT/LIRIS near-IR spectroscopy<br />

WHT/LIRIS-MOS<br />

Hβ, [OIII]5007, Hα, [NII]6584<br />

J-band, R∼700, 0”25/pix<br />

Hα for ∼30 NB galaxies<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 43


The power of Rainbow (see Pérez-González talk)<br />

Hα<br />

ACS-z<br />

IRAC-45


SFR tot – M* relation<br />

Massive galaxies have higher total SFRs (Hα obs<br />

+TIR)<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 45


Pseudo-Metallicities<br />

• N2=[NII]6584/Hα<br />

12+log(O/H)=8.90+0.57 x N2<br />

• SED fitting<br />

Metallicities estimated to be close to solar values<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 46


The first quantification of<br />

downsizing using a good SFR tracer<br />

Log Mtr<br />

DEEP-2<br />

Hα<br />

Bundy et al 06<br />

<br />

0.24<br />

<br />

10.0<br />

Redshift<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 47


An overall overview up to z∼1<br />

z=0.24<br />

pseudo local population<br />

Population dominated by disk-like g’s<br />

Moderately massive (~10 10 Mo)<br />

z=0.40<br />

Transition epoch<br />

Mass analysis under way<br />

z=0.84<br />

Enhanced star-forming systems<br />

No major mergers<br />

Massive systems (~10 11 Mo)


Future studies @ z>1.5<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 49


Hα @ 1.5


FISIR: a fully criogenic TF in the nIR<br />

Finding “holes” in the night sky<br />

Atmospheric<br />

lines dominate<br />

At higher spectral<br />

resolution,<br />

observe between<br />

them<br />

Jesús Gallego – UCM Granada 2008 51


Future<br />

TFs<br />

JWST TFI<br />

Gemini F2T2<br />

GTC-FISIR<br />

Prototype single etalon IR tunable<br />

filter for JWST. Contributed by the<br />

Canadian Sp Ag.<br />

F2T2 will be inserted into<br />

Flamingos-2 and fed by the<br />

Gemini MCAO system.<br />

First light<br />

~2014<br />

Early 2010<br />

Early 2010<br />

Spec resolution<br />

Wavelength<br />

F.O.V.<br />

100<br />

1.5µm – 3.5µm<br />

~2.5’<br />

800+<br />

30% of the range<br />

1.0µm – 1.35µm<br />

~50”<br />

800+<br />

30% of the range<br />

1.0µm – 2.5µm<br />

~3.5’<br />

Image quality<br />

Diffraction limited<br />

MCAO<br />

Diff. limited<br />

P.I.<br />

R. Doyon (Montreal)<br />

R. Abraham (Toronto)<br />

J. Gallego (UCM)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!