16.01.2014 Views

September 2011 - I-Micronews

September 2011 - I-Micronews

September 2011 - I-Micronews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 1 I S S U E N ° 1 3<br />

HCPV supply chain - Positioning of the HCPV players: three scenarios<br />

(Yole Développement, <strong>2011</strong>, HCPV report)<br />

“HCPV systems<br />

makers are largely<br />

outsourcing<br />

production of their<br />

custom component<br />

designs to<br />

optics makers,<br />

tracker makers<br />

and electronics<br />

contract<br />

assemblers,”<br />

says Milan Rosina,<br />

Yole Développement<br />

are largely outsourcing production of their custom<br />

component designs to optics makers, tracker makers<br />

and electronics contract assemblers. But it is difficult<br />

for the system makers to best optimize the system<br />

cost and performance without knowing exactly how<br />

design choices will impact manufacturing costs at<br />

the supplier, or how one component can best be<br />

optimized to work with another component made<br />

by someone else. Optimizing the system requires<br />

careful balancing of all the parts, trading off more<br />

complicated and expensive optical systems for less<br />

accurate trackers or vice versa, or adjusting the<br />

characteristics of the primary optic to those of the<br />

secondary optic, and that’s hard to do by separate<br />

players.<br />

The fragmented sector is equally a problem from the<br />

supplier side. Suppliers argue that the components<br />

could be better designed for efficient low cost<br />

manufacture if the designer knew something about<br />

the manufacturing process, and that components<br />

could be better optimized to work together if they<br />

were designed together. Tracker makers complain<br />

that they have no visibility into if the market is big<br />

enough to support development of custom trackers<br />

for modules of entirely different size, weight, and need<br />

for accuracy. Designing custom components for each<br />

separate system maker’s kilowatt-scale projects is a<br />

very low volume business, with volumes sometimes<br />

only in the hundreds of units, often too small a<br />

business to be of much interest for the supplier, and<br />

too small for efficient volume production.<br />

Much depends on the successful performance of the<br />

early megawatt-scale HCPV projects now coming<br />

on line to build credibility for the technology. But<br />

building the first larger 10s and 100s of megawattscale<br />

installations will also require business<br />

models that enable optimized system design and<br />

foster a viable supply chain to support volume<br />

manufacturing.<br />

www.yole.fr<br />

Milan Rosina is analyst at Yole Développement for<br />

photovoltaic market & technologies. He received<br />

his Ph. D. in 2002 from the INPG in France. He<br />

gained experience as a research scientist in several<br />

renowned R&D institutions & industrial companies<br />

where he worked in the field of microelectronics, PV,<br />

LED & nanotechnology.<br />

18 P V M a n u f a c t u r i n g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!