16.01.2014 Views

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter IM. Birth Weight 43<br />

Baltimore (Taback, 1951), New York City Fia. 23. Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Livo Births<br />

(Department <strong>of</strong> Health, 1963), and New by 19}60. Birth Weight, by Ethnic Group, United States,<br />

York State (Chase, 1961-1963).<br />

As staff members <strong>of</strong> the Pan American<br />

Health Organization, Verhoestraete and<br />

Puffer (1958-a) were concerned about the 30 I 'NONWHITI<br />

%WHITE<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> live births by birth weight for<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> the world. Available data were ­<br />

10 NONWHITE<br />

limited but information was collected from <br />

several sources to illustrate the variations " 'n"<br />

09<br />

3 I<br />

in several ethnic groups (Figure 22). Al-<br />

I0<br />

though the distributions <strong>of</strong> live births in the '*<br />

Io<br />

United States and in Birmingham, Eng-<br />

-,I<br />

land, showed the same general weight dis- 0 leol,,osllol ootIse,,oeIse t. .. . 0.- ....,<br />

.... .... O8<br />

tributions, the births in other ethnic groups.. .............. . I. : <br />

appeared to have a shift to the left, that is, <br />

WEIGHTIN GRAM<br />

to lower weights. However, even in the s..... vit.i st.atit.. . fh. .it St.t. (1901.<br />

birth-weight distributions in the white and<br />

nonwhite populations <strong>of</strong> the United States there were differences, with smaller percentages<br />

<strong>of</strong> nonwhites in the higher weight<br />

groups (Figure 23). Also, while in the<br />

Fia. 22. Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Live Births United States 0.47 l)er cent <strong>of</strong> white births<br />

by Birth Weight for Five Selected Areas or Groups. were in the birth-weight group <strong>of</strong> 1,000<br />

10 grams or less in 1950, only 0.29 prr cent<br />

were in that group in Birmingham, England,<br />

// in 1953.<br />

30 - IIn International Comparisons <strong>of</strong> Perinatal<br />

I I'<br />

and infant Mortality, Chase (1967)<br />

referred to "low-rate" countries in which<br />

. .// infants weighing 2,500 grams or less consti­<br />

20 a~<br />

0 ] .j<br />

1Z<br />

tuted 5 per cent <strong>of</strong> the live births, such<br />

countries including tile Netherlands, Sweden,<br />

and New Zealand. According to the<br />

"0 ,'.I- notifications <strong>of</strong> premature infants made to<br />

the British Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health in 1963, 7.4<br />

.s,<br />

per cent weighed 2,500 grams or less. Butler<br />

0-. and Alberman (1969) gave a frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

1.,000 2,000 .VA 4.000 .000 7.9 per cent for live births and stillbirths in<br />

WEIOHTIN GAMS<br />

the week <strong>of</strong> 3-9 March 1958, in the British<br />

- UNITEDS , ........... IMINGHAM.ENGLAND,93 Perinatal Mortality Survey; only 0.36 per<br />

-- CALCUTTA.INDIAN - -.- SOUTH AFEICA.INDIAN<br />

-- SOUTHA,ICA.,ANTU cent had birth weights under 1,001 grams,<br />

in contrast to 0.57 in the United States in<br />

Sote., Adopted fro. V@,1h..trefrt 6d .. P. 119 1- 0 -I. 1960.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!