BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...
BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ... BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...
Chapter III Birth Weight One of the intriguing findings of the In- in mortality in infants, such data have tile vestigation in regard to neonatal mortality greatest significance. was the unusually high proportion of deaths Weight at birth is dependent on the length of infants of low birth weight. The per- of gestation. Also there is some evidence centages of those (lying in the neonatal that birth weights vary in different ethnic period with birth weights of 2,500 grams or groups. There is a distinct possibility that less were surprisingly high, and the per- nutritional status of the mother affects the eentages in the higher weight groups of growth and development of the fetus and 2,501 grams or more were much lower than thus the birth weight. In a research prothose found in the United States in 1950 gram underway in the Institute of Nutri (Shapiro and Unger, 1965) and in the 1958 tion of Central America and Panama British Perinatal Mortality Survey (Butler (INCAP) the provision of additional food and Bonham, 1963). (20,000 calories or more during pregnancy) Clearly, comlpleteness of registration of to pregnant women in two villages in Guadeaths of low-birth-weight infants is the temala resulted in an increase of mean birth first and most important factor to be considered in evaluating the findings. The reshowed a change il et al., 1972). Such an increase was not obport of Chase (1969.) withIserved in infants in two neighboring villages the United States from 1950 to 1960, the percentage of infants dying in the neo- in which no additions were made to the pregnatal period with birth weights of 2,500 nant women's diets. grams or less increasing from 64.0 to 72.7 Birch (1972)-in his recent review of in that interval. No doubt registration of progress in the field of malnutrition, learnthe low-birth-weight babies had improved ing, and intelligence-comments on the reand mortality declined, especially in those lation of the mother's nutritional status to of higher birth weights. tile growth and development of her child To evaluate mortality by birth weight, it and states in a concluding paragraph: "We is essential to establish the denominators, have also pointed to intergenerational that is, live births by weight at birth. U1n- effects of nutrition upon mental developfortunately, the distributions of live births mnent. The association between the mother's by birth weight are rarely collected and growth acl .venients and the risk to her published for a city or country. Yet f(-' infant is very strong. Poor nutrition and understanding and interpreting differenceb poor health in the mother when she was a 41
'42 Patterns of Mortality inChildhood girl result in a woman at maturity who has a significantly elevated level of reproductive risk. Her pregnancy is more frequently disturbed and her child more often of low birth weight. Such a child is at increased risk of neurointegrative abnormality and of deficient IQ and school achievement." The data on birth weight collected in this Investigation deserve careful study and point to the need for additional research to clarify the role of nutritional status of mothers (and possibly other factors such as ethnic group, altitude, and maternal infection) on the weight of products of pregnancy. The evaluation of nutritional status of infants and children must begin with their status at birth, and the most satisfactory and essential measurement is birth weight. BACKGROUND The Sixth Revision of the International Classificationof Diseasesof WHO (1948-a), in Section XV on Certain Diseases of Early Infancy, gave the following definition: "For the purpose of this Classification an iminature infant is a livehorn infant with a birth weight of 5/ pounds (2,500 grams) or less, or specified as immature." In July 1948 the first World Health Assembly adopted Regulations (WHO, 1948-1)) governing application of the InternationialClassification by WHO Member Countries. Thus a definition of immaturity in terms of birth weight was established which should automatically be applied in countries using the Classification. In this Investigation efforts were made to obtain data on length of gestation for each birth, but the data were not as complete and reliable as those on birth weight and thus the definition utilizing weight only has been maintained, although the limitations of defining immaturity on the basis of birth weight alone are recognized. In the United States, when the standard birth certificate was revised in 1949, new certificates that included an item for birth weight were placed in use in many states. One of the authors (Puffer) assisted in introducing the- new certificate in tile btate of Tennessee, and she placed emphasis on the completion of the birth-weight item. It was necessary not only to obtain the cooperation of hospital staffs but also to furnish scales to midwives for weighing the newborn. In 1949 birth weights of 2,500 grams or less were recorded for 7.6 per cent of live births in Tennessee and for 62 per cent of neonatal deaths. Neonatal death rates were calculated according to birth-weight group. In a paper on uses of statistics on prematurity in Tennessee (Hutcheson and Puffer, 1951), the statement was made: "In the field of prematurity rapid strides are being made in the development of coinparable and useful data." Material that served to show the nature and size of the prematurity problem on the basis of birth weight was used at a series of workshops attended by health personnel in that state. Data for the United States for three months in 1950 were analyzed in depth by Shapiro and Unger (1965) and Loeb (1965). The National Center for Health Statistics in its annual reports on natality gives the distributions of births by birth weight. Also, reports and analyses are available for
- Page 9 and 10: DEDICATED TO ROBERT GOODWIN FIELD A
- Page 11 and 12: CONTENTS (cont.) Page Comparisons w
- Page 13 and 14: CONTENTS (cont.) Distribution of Li
- Page 15 and 16: xvi Patternsof Mortality in Childho
- Page 17 and 18: xviii Patternsof Mortalityin Childh
- Page 19 and 20: 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500
- Page 21 and 22: 2 Pattern8of Mortality in Childhood
- Page 23 and 24: 4: Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 25 and 26: •6 Pattern of Mortalityin,Childho
- Page 27 and 28: 8 Patterns ol Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 29 and 30: 10 Patternsof Mortalityin Childhood
- Page 31 and 32: 12 Pattermn of Mortalityin Childhoo
- Page 33 and 34: 14 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 35 and 36: 16 Patternso Mortality in Childhood
- Page 37 and 38: 18 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 39 and 40: 20 PatternsofMortality in Childhood
- Page 41 and 42: 22 Patternsof Mrtalityin (i'=LWWoo
- Page 43 and 44: 24 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 45 and 46: 26 Pattern8of Mortalityin Childhood
- Page 47 and 48: 28: Patterhs ol Mortality in Childh
- Page 49 and 50: 30 Patterns 01Aortalil inChildhood
- Page 51 and 52: 32, Pattern8ofMortality in Childhoo
- Page 53 and 54: 34 Patterms of Mortality in Childho
- Page 55 and 56: 36 Pattermsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 57 and 58: 38 Patternsof Mortalityin Childhood
- Page 59: 40 Patterns of Mortalityin Childhoo
- Page 63 and 64: 44 Patterns of Mortalitiiin'Childho
- Page 65 and 66: 46 Pattesof Mortality in Childhood
- Page 67 and 68: 48 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 69 and 70: 50 PatternSi of Mortalityin Childho
- Page 71 and 72: 52 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 73 and 74: 54,, Pattyern of Mortality in:Child
- Page 75 and 76: *56 Patterniof Mortality in Childho
- Page 77 and 78: Chapter IV Mortality in Childhood T
- Page 79 and 80: 60 Pattern&'oJMortalityin Childhood
- Page 81 and 82: 62 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 83 and 84: 64 Patternsof Mortality,in Childhbo
- Page 85 and 86: 66 Patternsof Mortalitv in Childhoo
- Page 87 and 88: !68 Patternsof Mortalityin Childhoo
- Page 89 and 90: 70 Patterns of Mortality in Childho
- Page 91 and 92: 72 Pattern oflMortality in Childhoo
- Page 93 and 94: 74' Patternsof Mortality in Childho
- Page 95 and 96: !78 Patterisof Mortality.in Childho
- Page 97 and 98: 78 Pdttern of Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 99 and 100: 80 Patternsof Mortalityin Childhood
- Page 101 and 102: 82 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 103 and 104: 84 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
- Page 105 and 106: 86 Patterns of Mortality in Childho
- Page 107 and 108: -88 .. . i atten8oiMortait~i 'Child
- Page 109 and 110: 90 Patternsof Mortality in Childhoo
Chapter III<br />
Birth Weight<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the intriguing findings <strong>of</strong> the In- in <strong>mortality</strong> in infants, such data have tile<br />
vestigation in regard to neonatal <strong>mortality</strong> greatest significance.<br />
was the unusually high proportion <strong>of</strong> deaths Weight at birth is dependent on the length<br />
<strong>of</strong> infants <strong>of</strong> low birth weight. The per- <strong>of</strong> gestation. Also there is some evidence<br />
centages <strong>of</strong> those (lying in the neonatal that birth weights vary in different ethnic<br />
period with birth weights <strong>of</strong> 2,500 grams or groups. There is a distinct possibility that<br />
less were surprisingly high, and the per- nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the mother affects the<br />
eentages in the higher weight groups <strong>of</strong> growth and development <strong>of</strong> the fetus and<br />
2,501 grams or more were much lower than thus the birth weight. In a research prothose<br />
found in the United States in 1950 gram underway in the Institute <strong>of</strong> Nutri<br />
(Shapiro and Unger, 1965) and in the 1958 tion <strong>of</strong> Central America and Panama<br />
British Perinatal Mortality Survey (Butler (INCAP) the provision <strong>of</strong> additional food<br />
and Bonham, 1963).<br />
(20,000 calories or more during pregnancy)<br />
Clearly, comlpleteness <strong>of</strong> registration <strong>of</strong> to pregnant women in two villages in Guadeaths<br />
<strong>of</strong> low-birth-weight infants is the temala resulted in an increase <strong>of</strong> mean birth<br />
first and most important factor to be considered<br />
in evaluating the findings. The reshowed<br />
a change il et al., 1972). Such an increase was not obport<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chase (1969.)<br />
withIserved in infants in two neighboring villages<br />
the United States from 1950 to 1960,<br />
the percentage <strong>of</strong> infants dying in the neo- in which no additions were made to the pregnatal<br />
period with birth weights <strong>of</strong> 2,500 nant women's diets.<br />
grams or less increasing from 64.0 to 72.7 Birch (1972)-in his recent review <strong>of</strong><br />
in that interval. No doubt registration <strong>of</strong> progress in the field <strong>of</strong> malnutrition, learnthe<br />
low-birth-weight babies had improved ing, and intelligence-comments on the reand<br />
<strong>mortality</strong> declined, especially in those lation <strong>of</strong> the mother's nutritional status to<br />
<strong>of</strong> higher birth weights.<br />
tile growth and development <strong>of</strong> her child<br />
To evaluate <strong>mortality</strong> by birth weight, it and states in a concluding paragraph: "We<br />
is essential to establish the denominators, have also pointed to intergenerational<br />
that is, live births by weight at birth. U1n- effects <strong>of</strong> nutrition upon mental developfortunately,<br />
the distributions <strong>of</strong> live births mnent. The association between the mother's<br />
by birth weight are rarely collected and growth acl .venients and the risk to her<br />
published for a city or country. Yet f(-' infant is very strong. Poor nutrition and<br />
understanding and interpreting differenceb poor health in the mother when she was a<br />
41