16.01.2014 Views

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

BIBLIOGRAPHIC INPUT SHEET TEMPORARY Patterns of mortality ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ChapterXIV. Socioeconomic and Related Factors<br />

273<br />

ical, and environmental background; that explored as a measure <strong>of</strong> socioeconomic<br />

is, education reflects the preparation <strong>of</strong> per- status, but the analysis <strong>of</strong> nortality accordsons<br />

for responsible parenthood."<br />

ing to educational level <strong>of</strong> mother proved to<br />

In this chapter occupation <strong>of</strong> father is be a more sensitive measure.<br />

MARITAL RELATIONSHIP OF PARENTS<br />

In 14 widely separated projects* in this In 12 projects, 75 per cent or more <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Investigation, differences were found in the families had both parents living in the<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> households in which the de- home, the highest percentage (97.3) being in<br />

ceased children lived. Table 163 provid'es Sherbrooke (Figure 138). Monterrey and<br />

data on the presence <strong>of</strong> parents in the home the Bolivia project were next in order, with<br />

and on their marital relationship. 91.4 and 88.8 per cent, respectively. In<br />

only two projects were the percentages lower<br />

*As home interviews were not conducted in the pro- than 75 (El Salvador 64.5, and KWngstonject<br />

in California, information on marital status <strong>of</strong><br />

parents and on educational level was not obtained. St. Andrew 54.8).<br />

TABLE 163. Presence <strong>of</strong> Parents in the Homes <strong>of</strong> Deceased Children Under 5 Years <strong>of</strong> Age, and<br />

Parents' Marital Status, in 14 Projects.<br />

Both parents in household<br />

Mother Father Neither<br />

Total Common-law only only<br />

Project families% Total Married union<br />

No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />

Total .................. 27,844 22,340 80.2 15,233 54.7 7,107 25 , 4,690 10.9272 1.0 530 1.9<br />

ARGENTINA<br />

Chaco Province ...... 1,645 1,326 80.6 455 27.7 871 52.9 275 16.7 21 1.3 23 1.4<br />

San Juan Province . 1,95 1,650 82.7 1,256 03.0 394 10.7 303 15. 8 0.4<br />

BOLIVIA project ........ 2,739 2,433 88.8 2.134 77.0 299 10.9 264 0.6 33 1.2 34 1.7<br />

0 0.3<br />

BRAZIL<br />

Recife ................. 3,115 2,380 70.4 1,317 42.3 1,063 34.1 522 16.8 52 1.7 161 5.2<br />

Ribeirao Preto .......... 989 869 87.9 803 81.2 66 6.7 104 10.5 2 0.2 14 2.4<br />

Sao Paulo ............. 3,669 3,245 88.4 2,667 72.7 578 15.8 367 10.0 18 0.5 39 1.1<br />

CANADA<br />

Sherbrooke ............. 320 320 97.3 315 95.7. 5 1.5 7 2.1 1 0.3 1 0.3<br />

CHILE project ........... 1,892 1,633 86.3 1,355 71.6 278 14.7 224 11.8 4 0.2 31 1.6<br />

COLOMBIA<br />

Call ...................<br />

Cartagena .............<br />

Medellin ...............<br />

EL SALVADOR project...<br />

1,151<br />

862<br />

083<br />

3,685<br />

901<br />

668<br />

783<br />

2,376<br />

78.3<br />

77.5<br />

79.7<br />

64.5<br />

586 50.9<br />

304 35.3<br />

727 74.0<br />

512 13.9<br />

315<br />

364<br />

56<br />

1,864<br />

27.4<br />

42.2<br />

5.7<br />

50.6<br />

209<br />

164<br />

171<br />

1,136<br />

18.2<br />

10.0<br />

17.4<br />

30.8<br />

25<br />

16<br />

5<br />

57<br />

2.2 10<br />

1.9 14<br />

0.5 24<br />

1.5 116<br />

JAMAICA<br />

Kingston-St. Andrew .... 1,703 934 54.8 270 15.9 664 39.0 721 42.3 15 0.9 33 1.9<br />

MEXICO<br />

Monterrey ............. 3,087 2,822 01.4 2,532 82.0 290 9.4 220 7.4 15 0.5 21 0.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.6<br />

2.4<br />

3.1<br />

In families in which home interviews were conducted and information was provided.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!