kinematic analysis of hurdling performances at 2000 united states ...

KINEMATIC ANALYSIS OF HURDLING PERFORMANCES AT 2000 UNITED STATES
OLYMPIC TRIALS
Alfred Finch 1 , Gideon Ariel 2 , and John McNichols 1
1
Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN USA
2
Ariel Dynamics, Inc., San Diego, CA USA
Video images of the third hurdle clearance by the finalists in the Men’s 110 m hurdles at the United
States Olympic Trials were recorded from 3 camera views. Temporal and kinematic variables were
calculated from the film records for the 4 competitors whose hurdle clearances were unobscured out of
the 8 competitors. The mean foot contact time during the take-off was .142 s and the average flight time
was .317 s. The hurdlers increased their horizontal velocity of the CM during the take-off stride by 13
cmhsec -1 and they increased their horizontal velocity of the CM at landing by 84.8 cmhsec -1 . The
hurdler elevated their CM from the take-off by 11.6 cm during hurdle clearance and a peak rise of 14.7
cm for the body’s CM was found at peak elevation. The apex of the flight trajectory occurred on the
average 3.2 cm before the hurdle and the hurdler left the ground 224 cm before the hurdle and landed
143 cm behind the hurdle. Integrated multimedia analyses of their hurdling performances were presented
at the USATF Elite hurdling development camp.
KEY WORDS: kinematic analysis, Elite hurdlers, Olympic Trials
INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this project were to collect video records of elite high hurdlers
during the 2000 United States Olympic Trials, kinematically analyze their performance, and
immediately review the hurdling technique with the athletes/coaches using an integrated multimedia
presentation approach. This project’s objectives were supported by the United States Track and Field
Hurdling Development committee for the identification and further development of the elite hurdlers
participating at the Olympic Trials. Hurdling is a specialized form of sprinting that requires the
clearance of a series of hurdles. The goal of sprinting is to cover the distance in the shortest time
possible, in may be concluded that an athlete’s success in the event may be influenced by their ability to
produce the greatest horizontal velocity. To produce high horizontal velocities it is necessary to produce
large amounts of horizontal force while in contact with the ground. Therefore, the horizontal force
applied may be expressed by the following formula:
Horizontal Force = Mass • ( ∆Horizontal Velocity) • Ground Time -1
METHODS: Video records of 8 Elite high hurdlers were taken at 60 Hz from two front right and
sagittal perspectives as they cleared the third hurdle during the high hurdle finals of the 2000 United
States Olympic Team Track and Field Trials (See Figure 1).

Only 4 hurdlers’ performances were digitized due to obscured views as the flight passed over the hurdle.
Fourteen body data points, 6 hurdle points (right & left top, base, & standard base), and the fixed
reference marker on the video images of the hurdle trials were digitized, the coordinate data were scaled
using an 3-DLT transformation, and then smoothed using a quintic spline filter. To examine the
relationships between horizontal force production, contact time, and flight time, the temporal variables
of foot contact time during the stride prior to take-off and flight time were determined. Kinematic data
included the changes in CM horizontal velocity during foot contact at take-off, changes in CM
horizontal velocity at landing after hurdle clearance, vertical elevation of CM during hurdle clearance
from take-off, and horizontal displacement of the CM apex in comparison to hurdle clearance position.
Additionally, the displacement of the foot at take-off from the hurdle, and the displacement of the
landing foot from the hurdle were determined (See Figure 2).
Technique analysis of the video records were reviewed with the athlete, his coach, and a member of the
United States of America Track and Field (USATF) Elite hurdling development staff, the next day after
the competition. Subsequent analyses using data integration techniques of the hurdler’s video records,
stick figure reconstruction with the CM traced, and the kinematic data graphs of their hurdling trials
were generated. These integrated multimedia displays are to be provided to the athletes at the USATF
Elite Hurdling Development camp to be held at the United States Olympic Committee Training facility
in Chula Vista, California (See Figure 3).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Means and standard deviations of the temporal and kinematic data of
the elite high hurdlers’ performances at the 2000 United States Track and Field Olympic Team Trials
were calculated and are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Temporal & kinematic data for 2000 Olympic Trials - 110m hurdles
Variable D. Wallace A. Johnson L. Wade T. Dees Mean SD
Contact Time .150 .133 .133 .150 .142 .010
s
Flight Time s .333 .302 .300 .333 .317 .018
Hor CM Vel. 52.0 49.0 -69.0 20.0 13.0 56.5
Take-off
cm/s
Hor CM Vel. -33.5 9.3 180.1 183.3 84.8 113.3
Landing
cm/s
CM 1.0 9.2 21.4 14.9 11.6 8.6
Elevation at
Clearance
CM Vertical 5.7 12.2 22.8 18.0 14.7 7.4
Displacement
cm
CM Apex -34.9 -17.2 0.6 38.8 -3.2 31.5
Hor
Displacement
cm
Take-off 261.0 218.1 210.8 208.3 224.6 24.7
Displacement
cm
Landing
Displacement
cm
95.8 174.9 164.3 140.2 143.8 35.1
The mean foot contact time calculated for the step going into the hurdle for this study’s elite high
hurdlers were slightly faster than the 0.135 s contact times reported by R. Mann (1993) in the Elite
Hurdler Project technical report. But these values were slightly slower than the .122s foot contact times
for the American Elite hurdlers determined by Finch, Ariel & McNichols (2000). In the present study,
the flight times were found to be similar to the .31 s flight times determined for the good elite hurdlers
analyzed in the 1993 project and faster than the reported .366 s flight times determined at an American
Elite Hurdling development camp. The shorter flight times may be attributable to the present study’s
elite level of training and the competitive nature of the Olympic Trials. The high hurdlers elevated their
CM approximately 11.6 cm at hurdle clearance above their CM position at take-off during the hurdling
movement and they attained a peak CM height of 14.7 above their CM take-off position. The high
hurdlers’ horizontal displacements between the apex of the CM trajectory and the hurdle ranged from
34.9 cm in front of the hurdle to 38.8 cm after the hurdle. The hurdlers’ mean horizontal displacement
of the apex was 3.2 cm before the hurdle. Therefore some of the hurdlers need to work on their strides
going to the hurdle and the CM projection trajectory, in order to make their CM flight trajectory apex

coincide with the hurdle clearance position rather than in front. If this alignment of the trajectory peak
was made then the hurdlers would not need to produce as great an elevation and shorter flight times
would result. Only, one of the high hurdlers’ CM peak trajectories coincided with the hurdle clearance.
The hurdlers’ average take-off distance was 224.6 cm and their landing distance was 143.8 cm. These
displacements were very close to the 213 cm (7 ft) take-off and 122 cm (4 ft) landing displacements, that
are typically discussed by hurdle coach clinicians. The alterations in the horizontal velocities of the CM
during the take-off found that the high hurdlers increased their velocity by 13 cmhsec - 1 or
approximately 1% of their running velocity. These accelerative changes in the horizontal velocities for
the hurdlers would be indicative of an appropriate stride length foot at foot plant prior to take-off.
During the landing phase, the hurdlers experienced an acceleration of 84 cmhsec -1 or about 7.6% of
their running velocity, as they came over of the hurdle, which would be indicative of the hurdler landing
in a tall running position rather than settling and retarding their running velocity. The application of
greater horizontal forces would be indicated by shorter ground contact times and those horizontal forces
may only be generated when the hurdler is contact on the ground, therefore long flight times while
clearing the hurdle would not be beneficial in achieving fast hurdling times. The small vertical CM
displacements observed for the hurdlers during hurdle clearance indicated that the hurdlers strode over
the hurdle, thus reducing the flight time and increasing the acceleration of the body when in contact with
the ground.
CONCLUSIONS: The hurdlers experienced their greatest acceleration during the landing phase after
the hurdle clearance than the step prior to take-off. Only one of the four hurdlers’ apex of their CM
flight trajectory occurred over the hurdle. The hurdlers’ apex of their CM parabolic pathway should
occur while clearing the hurdle. A horizontal displacement between the CM apex and the hurdle would
be indicative of improper striding or flight trajectories, where the take-off step occurred too close or too
far from the hurdle or they projected their body at an improper angle. An apex displacement would
indicate that the hurdler reached his peak flight position either slightly before or after the hurdle. The
simultaneous integration of video, stick figures and data was used as a visual coaching and research tool
for performing a hurdle analysis and providing immediate feedback to the athlete and coach.
REFERENCES:
Finch, A., Ariel, G., & McNichols, J. (2000). Integrated kinematic data analysis of American elite
hurdlers. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports XVIII, The University
of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Mann, R. (1993). The mechanics of sprinting and hurdling. Elite Hurdler Project technical report.
United States Track & Field Association, 1-135.
McDonald, C., & Dapena, J. (1991). Linear kinematics of the men’s 110-m and women’s 100-m
hurdles races. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 23:1382-91.