Denford Park, Kintbury - Hungerford Virtual Museum

Denford Park, Kintbury - Hungerford Virtual Museum Denford Park, Kintbury - Hungerford Virtual Museum

hungerfordvirtualmuseum.co.uk
from hungerfordvirtualmuseum.co.uk More from this publisher
15.01.2014 Views

Denford Park. Kintbury, Berkshire i Both Wyattville and Papworth designed buildings in many different styles and both designed ones with similar bows. For example, Wyattville remodelled Woolley Park, Brightwalton, Berkshire in 1799; the cement rendered main facade sports a big bow with attached Tuscan columns. 49 Thirty years later, Papworth added a large bow window to Little Grove, Barnet, in 1828. 50 However, on balance, it seems more likely that the bow was part of the original design, based mainly on the evidence of the internal layout. The internal divisions reflect the present footprint of the house, as do, perhaps more importantly, the positions of the fireplaces. Thus, the main saloon with bowed front would have been a very much less significant space if the bow was not original, as would the main bedroom above; in both cases, the present fireplaces are roughly central to the rooms they serve - inclusive of the bowed projections. More support for the bowed garden front being primary is an undated inkwash of 'Denford House before alterations'. This shows the bowed front in place but there has been discussion as to the date of the illustration. Papworth is known to have made changes to the parapet of the Main House. Prior to that time there seems only to have been a cornice and the roof had overhanging eaves in the Italianate manner. On the ink-wash view of the garden front the roof over both the main part of the house and the services are shown to have overhanging eaves; the Main House is also shown to have had a cornice beneath the eaves. The quality of the drawing suggests that it would have been unlikely for the artist not to have shown the existing parapet if it had been in place. The sketch seems to be of a broad-19 th century style and as a result, the alterations in question are unlikely to have been those of 1939. 5 Indeed, photographs of 1924 show that the parapet was already in place by that time. On balance, therefore, it is suggested that this illustration shows the house more or less as built to Wyattville's design in 1815 - and that the bow front is part of his design and that the house originally had overhanging eaves. The style was therefore less strictly neo-classical than a typically and rather stiffly English variant on the Italianate villa. The internal layout of the main part of the house seems to have been fairly straightforward and there are no indications that it has been altered significantly in plan. The design of the entrance is open to debate considering that it may have been remodelled. If the present arrangement and portico do indeed belong to the 1830's alterations, it is likely that the front door was protected in some way - perhaps by a 49 Pevsner, N, 1988, The Buildings of England: Berkshire, 102 '° Worsley, G (ed.), 1991, Architectural Drawings of the Regency Period, 94-5 '' The title of the ink-wash is Denford House; by 1939 it was known as Denford Park -70- Richard KMorriss & Associates, Historic Buildings Consultants, Bromlow House, Bromlow, Shropshire, SYS OEA

DenfordPark, Kintbury. Berkshire simple loggia infilling the gap between the projecting 'wings' to each side of the recess. He designed something similar at Wooley Park, for example. Within the central part of the building was the Entrance Hall and, to the south of that, the main reception room with the bowed front - the Saloon or Drawing Room. To either side of the Saloon were other reception rooms; the eastern one, being nearest to the services and the kitchens, was probably the Dining Room and the other a Parlour. To the west of the Hall was the main Stair Hall with a small .Closet off it To the East of the Hall a passage led to the services and between it and the north front was a smaller room, perhaps the Study. At first-floor level there was a second Closet off the Stair Landing, above the one on the ground-floor. A small lobby off the landing linked it to the main axial first-floor corridor. At this level much of the decoration appears to be primary, including the typical Regency period fluted door cases and cornices. The main bedroom suite - of bedchamber, dressing room and anteroom - occupied the central section south of the corridor, the bedroom having the three windows in the bowed front. To the west and east of this were large bedrooms; the south-western one seems to have had a dressing room inserted into it but the evidence may be misleading; the south-eastern one had, according to the 1924 sales details, a bed alcove - a curiously old-fashioned feature for the early-19 th century, and certainly seems to have lacked a dressing room. There was a fourth bedroom in the north-eastern corner. To the east of the main body of the house the service areas, whilst physically attached were architecturally articulated by being lower and plainer. The mam Service Range was also set away from the Main House and linked to it by a fairly narrow link block. These ranges also had roofs with overhanging eaves. The link block is shown in plan on the detailed Ordnance Survey maps. Its south wall roughly bisected the eastern elevation of the Main Block whilst it north wall was a little to the south of the north wall of the replacement East Wing (Building B2). The link block is shown on the mid-19 th century ink wash and on photographs of 1924 - but is largely hidden by foliage. Its roof is shown as being lower than that of the present surviving Service Range by 1924 but was probably originally at the same level; the roof of the Service Range was probably raised by Papworth in the 1830's (see below). The eastern end of the link block is shown on one of Papworth plans. This shows it to have had a central passageway in line with the present one in the East Wing and Service Range on the ground floor with small rooms to either side. This would have been accessed by the short passage off the Entrance Hall. If there was a passage on the same alignment at first-floor level, that would have been on the same line as the present passage too - and have required the same 'baffle' entrance at the west end from the house; this could suggest that the walls, or at least -71- Richard K Morriss & Associates, Historic Buildings Consultants, Bromlow House, Bromlow, Shropshire, SYS OEA

<strong>Denford</strong> <strong>Park</strong>. <strong>Kintbury</strong>, Berkshire<br />

i<br />

Both Wyattville and Papworth designed buildings in many different styles and both<br />

designed ones with similar bows. For example, Wyattville remodelled Woolley <strong>Park</strong>,<br />

Brightwalton, Berkshire in 1799; the cement rendered main facade sports a big bow<br />

with attached Tuscan columns. 49 Thirty years later, Papworth added a large bow<br />

window to Little Grove, Barnet, in 1828. 50<br />

However, on balance, it seems more likely that the bow was part of the original<br />

design, based mainly on the evidence of the internal layout. The internal divisions<br />

reflect the present footprint of the house, as do, perhaps more importantly, the<br />

positions of the fireplaces. Thus, the main saloon with bowed front would have been<br />

a very much less significant space if the bow was not original, as would the main<br />

bedroom above; in both cases, the present fireplaces are roughly central to the rooms<br />

they serve - inclusive of the bowed projections.<br />

More support for the bowed garden front being primary is an undated inkwash of<br />

'<strong>Denford</strong> House before alterations'. This shows the bowed front in place but there<br />

has been discussion as to the date of the illustration.<br />

Papworth is known to have made changes to the parapet of the Main House. Prior to<br />

that time there seems only to have been a cornice and the roof had overhanging eaves<br />

in the Italianate manner.<br />

On the ink-wash view of the garden front the roof over both the main part of the<br />

house and the services are shown to have overhanging eaves; the Main House is also<br />

shown to have had a cornice beneath the eaves.<br />

The quality of the drawing suggests that it would have been unlikely for the artist not<br />

to have shown the existing parapet if it had been in place. The sketch seems to be of a<br />

broad-19 th century style and as a result, the alterations in question are unlikely to have<br />

been those of 1939. 5 Indeed, photographs of 1924 show that the parapet was already<br />

in place by that time.<br />

On balance, therefore, it is suggested that this illustration shows the house more or<br />

less as built to Wyattville's design in 1815 - and that the bow front is part of his<br />

design and that the house originally had overhanging eaves. The style was therefore<br />

less strictly neo-classical than a typically and rather stiffly English variant on the<br />

Italianate villa.<br />

The internal layout of the main part of the house seems to have been fairly<br />

straightforward and there are no indications that it has been altered significantly in<br />

plan.<br />

The design of the entrance is open to debate considering that it may have been<br />

remodelled. If the present arrangement and portico do indeed belong to the 1830's<br />

alterations, it is likely that the front door was protected in some way - perhaps by a<br />

49 Pevsner, N, 1988, The Buildings of England: Berkshire, 102<br />

'° Worsley, G (ed.), 1991, Architectural Drawings of the Regency Period, 94-5<br />

'' The title of the ink-wash is <strong>Denford</strong> House; by 1939 it was known as <strong>Denford</strong> <strong>Park</strong><br />

-70-<br />

Richard KMorriss & Associates, Historic Buildings Consultants, Bromlow House, Bromlow, Shropshire, SYS OEA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!