An Ontology for Digital Forensics in IT Security Incidents - OPUS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

86 BIBLIOGRAPHY [Carrier, 2012c] Carrier, B. D. (2012c). Tsk tool overview - sleuthkitwiki. http://wiki.sleuthkit.org/index.php?title=TSK_Tool_Overview. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 4.3.1 [Carrier and Grand, 2004] Carrier, B. D. and Grand, J. (2004). A hardwarebased memory acquisition procedure for digital investigations. Digit. Investig., 1(1):5060. 4.1.2.2 [Cohen, 2012] Cohen, M. (2012). Pyag. http://sourceforge.net/ projects/pyflag/, http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/PyFlag. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 2 [Council and Institute, 1998] Council, I. T. I. and Institute, A. N. S. (1998). American National Standard for Information Technology: AT Attachment-3 Interface for (ATA-3). American National Standards Institute. 4.1.2.1 [Cytoscape Consortium, 2012] Cytoscape Consortium (2012). Cytoscape: An open source platform for complex network analysis and visualization. http://www.cytoscape.org/. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 5.2.5 [Davis, 2008] Davis, N. (2008). Live memory acquisition for windows operating systems: Tools and techniques for analysis. Technical report, Eastern Michigan University. 4.1.2.2 [De Smet, 2009] De Smet, P. (2009). Semi-automatic forensic reconstruction of ripped-up documents. In Document Analysis and Recognition, 2009. ICDAR '09. 10th International Conference on, pages 703 707. 1 [Ellson et al., 2013] Ellson, J., Gansner, E., Hu, Y., Bilgin, A., and Perry, D. (2013). Graphviz | graphviz - graph visualization software. http: //www.graphviz.org/. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 5.2.7 [Ewert and Schultz, 1992] Ewert, R. A. and Schultz, S. M. (1992). Automatic hard disk bad sector remapping. 4.1.2.1 [Farrell, 2009] Farrell, P. F. J. (2009). A framework for automated digital forensic reporting. Master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey. 2 [Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2011] Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011). FBI International Cyber Ring That Infected Millions of Computers Dismantled. http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/ november/malware_110911. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 4.2.3.2 [Garnkel, 2009] Garnkel, S. (2009). Automating disk forensic processing with sleuthkit, xml and python. In Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering, 2009. SADFE '09. Fourth International IEEE Workshop on, pages 73 84. 2
BIBLIOGRAPHY 87 [Garnkel, 2010] Garnkel, S. L. (2010). Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. Digital Investigation, 7, Supplement(0):S64 S73. The Proceedings of the Tenth Annual DFRWS Conference. 1, 2 [Gephi Consortium, 2012] Gephi Consortium (2012). Gephi, an open source graph visualization and manipulation software. https://gephi.org/. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 5.2.3 [Gruber, 2009] Gruber, T. (2009). Ontology. http://tomgruber.org/ writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm. [last accessed:17.02.2013]. 5.1 [Harris, 2006] Harris, R. (2006). Arriving at an anti-forensics consensus: Examining how to dene and control the anti-forensics problem. Digital Investigation, 3, Supplement(0):44 49. The Proceedings of the 6th Annual Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS '06). 4.2.3.3 [Hitzler et al., 2008a] Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., and Sure, Y. (2008a). Semantic Web, chapter 2, pages 1532. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Struktur mit XML. 5.1.3 [Hitzler et al., 2008b] Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., and Sure, Y. (2008b). Semantic Web, chapter 3, pages 3488. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Einfache Ontologien in RDF und RDF Schema. 5.1.3 [Hitzler et al., 2008c] Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., and Sure, Y. (2008c). Semantic Web, chapter 5, pages 123159. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Ontologien in OWL. 5.1.3 [Huynh et al., 2003] Huynh, C., de Chazal, P., McErlean, D., Reilly, R., Hannigan, T., and Fleury, L. (2003). Automatic classication of shoeprints for use in forensic science based on the fourier transform. In Image Processing, 2003. ICIP 2003. Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on, volume 3, pages III 56972 vol.2. 1 [IADT Chicago, 2011] IADT Chicago (2011). Famous computer forensics case | iadt - chicago. http://www.iadt.edu/Student-Life/IADT-Buzz/ January-2011/Most-Famous-Case-Solved-Computer-Forensics. [last accessed: 17.02.2013]. 4.1.1 [Kruse and Heiser, 2001] Kruse, W. and Heiser, J. (2001). Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials. Pearson Education. 4.1, 4.1.2, 4.1.2, 4.2.3.3 [Manson et al., 2007] Manson, D., Carlin, A., Ramos, S., Gyger, A., Kaufman, M., and Treichelt, J. (2007). Is the open way a better way? digital forensics using open source tools. In System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, page 266b. 4.3
Page 1:
Diplomarbeit An Ontology for Digita
Page 4 and 5:
Acknowledgement I would like to tha
Page 6 and 7:
4 CONTENTS 5.1.4 Storage . . . . .
Page 8 and 9:
6 CONTENTS
Page 10 and 11:
8 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION data lead
Page 12 and 13:
10 CHAPTER 2. RELATED WORK investig
Page 14 and 15:
12 CHAPTER 3. GOAL FORENSIC SEMANTI
Page 16 and 17:
14 CHAPTER 3. GOAL FORENSIC SEMANTI
Page 18 and 19:
16 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS Basic rules
Page 20 and 21:
18 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS 4.1.2.2 Ran
Page 22 and 23:
20 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS entry conta
Page 24 and 25:
22 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS 4.2.3.1 Reg
Page 26 and 27:
24 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS vulnerable
Page 28 and 29:
26 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS The fls -m
Page 30 and 31:
28 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS of the sock
Page 32 and 33:
30 CHAPTER 4. FORENSICS
Page 34 and 35:
32 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY Person name
Page 36 and 37:
34 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY 5.1.1 Creati
Page 38 and 39: 36 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY Resource Des
Page 40 and 41: 38 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY to be Augsbu
Page 42 and 43: 40 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY Gephi and Cy
Page 44 and 45: 42 CHAPTER 5. ONTOLOGY
Page 46 and 47: 44 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY for
Page 48 and 49: 46 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY pro
Page 50 and 51: 48 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY reg
Page 52 and 53: 50 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY 6.9
Page 54 and 55: 52 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY Par
Page 56 and 57: 54 CHAPTER 6. FORENSIC ONTOLOGY
Page 58 and 59: 56 CHAPTER 7. IMPLEMENTATION 7.3 RD
Page 60 and 61: 58 CHAPTER 7. IMPLEMENTATION the co
Page 62 and 63: 60 CHAPTER 7. IMPLEMENTATION 1 SELE
Page 64 and 65: 62 CHAPTER 7. IMPLEMENTATION Anothe
Page 66 and 67: 64 CHAPTER 7. IMPLEMENTATION 7.8 St
Page 68 and 69: 66 CHAPTER 8. EVALUATION 6. The las
Page 70 and 71: 68 CHAPTER 8. EVALUATION key (CTEMO
Page 72 and 73: 70 CHAPTER 9. SUMMARY after some is
Page 74 and 75: 72 APPENDIX A. EXTRACTION TOOL LIST
Page 76 and 77: 74 APPENDIX A. EXTRACTION TOOL LIST
Page 78 and 79: 76 APPENDIX B. FORENSIC TOOLS OUTPU
Page 80 and 81: 78 APPENDIX C. SCREENSHOTS Figure C
Page 86 and 87: 84 APPENDIX C. SCREENSHOTS
Page 90 and 91: 88 BIBLIOGRAPHY [Microsoft, 2010] M
Page 92: 90 BIBLIOGRAPHY [W3C, 2004] W3C (20
show all

An Ontology for Digital Forensics in IT Security Incidents - OPUS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?