14.01.2014 Views

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX<br />

Open and Closed Sections<br />

In the present edition sections in the Hebrew manuscripts were recorded in the apparatuses<br />

according to the type of the sources. In Apparatuses II and III the siglum § indicates an<br />

interval functioning as a marker of a new sense unit, without differentiating between types<br />

of intervals (i.e. whether “open” or “closed” sections, in masoretic terms). Such intervals<br />

were recorded only in instances in which there was no correspondence between ` and other<br />

manuscripts, that is when an interval was present in a manuscript but lacking in `, or when<br />

present in ` but lacking in a given manuscript.<br />

In Apparatus IV sections are treated differently, because the affiliation of a masoretic<br />

codex (e.g. to the Ben Asher tradition) depends – among other factors – on the (dis)agreement<br />

in reference to sections. Therefore in this apparatus sections were recorded with the<br />

indication “closed” (q) or “open” (t).<br />

The following table presents an overview of the material. It includes all intervals, specifying<br />

“open” and “closed” types, in all extant sources: Judean Desert scrolls, recorded in<br />

Apparatus II; the complete manuscripts and Geniza fragments, recorded in Apparatus III;<br />

and the manuscripts recorded in Apparatus IV. * As a rule, a blank cell indicates a lacuna in<br />

the manuscript, and means that it could not be determined whether a “closed” or “open”<br />

section is involved. Lack of a section is marked by the symbol > (or ].<br />

Corrections in section markings are indicated by the sigla used in apparatus IV: a single<br />

apostrophe marks the original or prima manus reading; a double apostrophe marks the corrected<br />

or secunda manus reading. Thus e.g. "t 'q means that the manuscript originally had<br />

a closed section, but later was corrected to an open section. Doubtful readings, which usually<br />

are due to the poor preservation of a manuscript, or cases in which the nature of the<br />

correction could not be defined, are marked by a question mark (?).<br />

The symbols used in the table:<br />

t<br />

dgezt dyxt<br />

open section (a blank interval, followed by a text at the beginning of a new line)<br />

q dnezq dyxt<br />

closed section (a blank interval in the middle of a line followed by a text)<br />

^ weqt rvn`a dwqt, a section within a verse<br />

' prima manus (before a correction)<br />

" secunda manus (after a correction)<br />

? dubious reading<br />

* The table of sections in MSS recorded in apparatus IV is justified to the right, like the apparatus itself.<br />

xlix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!