14.01.2014 Views

Survey on Rules on Loss of Nationality in International Treaties and ...

Survey on Rules on Loss of Nationality in International Treaties and ...

Survey on Rules on Loss of Nationality in International Treaties and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SURVEY ON RULES ON LOSS OF NATIONALITY IN INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND CASE LAW 9<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>.<br />

- 7. Notwithst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g the provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> paragraph 2 above, where applicable, when a nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>of</strong> a<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tract<strong>in</strong>g Party who is a m<strong>in</strong>or <strong>and</strong> whose parents are nati<strong>on</strong>als <strong>of</strong> different C<strong>on</strong>tract<strong>in</strong>g Parties acquires<br />

the nati<strong>on</strong>ality <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> his parents, each <strong>of</strong> these Parties may provide that he reta<strong>in</strong>s the nati<strong>on</strong>ality <strong>of</strong><br />

orig<strong>in</strong>."<br />

Of the Member States <strong>of</strong> the European Uni<strong>on</strong>, three (Austria, 32 Denmark <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s) are bound by the<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>ality part this C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. 33 Orig<strong>in</strong>ally, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxemburg <strong>and</strong> Sweden were<br />

also C<strong>on</strong>tract<strong>in</strong>g Parties, but these countries denounced either the whole C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> or the nati<strong>on</strong>ality chapter<br />

<strong>of</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. The Sec<strong>on</strong>d Protocol was previously b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g for France, Italy <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, but<br />

France <strong>and</strong> Italy denounced the Protocol together with the nati<strong>on</strong>ality part <strong>of</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009,<br />

respectively. 34 The Sec<strong>on</strong>d Protocol is now <strong>on</strong>ly relevant for the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

2.7 Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the Elim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> all Forms <strong>of</strong> Racial<br />

Discrim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> (New York, 21 December 1965) 35<br />

The Internati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the Elim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> all Forms <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> (ICERD) was opened<br />

for signature <strong>in</strong> 1965. 36 At the time <strong>of</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g, 176 States are bound by the C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. All <strong>of</strong> the Member<br />

States <strong>of</strong> the European Uni<strong>on</strong> are bound by this C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Article 5 <strong>of</strong> this C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> obliges the States Parties “to prohibit <strong>and</strong> to elim<strong>in</strong>ate racial discrim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> all<br />

its forms <strong>and</strong> to guarantee the right <strong>of</strong> every<strong>on</strong>e, without dist<strong>in</strong>cti<strong>on</strong> as to race, colour, or nati<strong>on</strong>al or ethnic<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>, to equality before the law, notably <strong>in</strong> the enjoyment <strong>of</strong>” a number <strong>of</strong> enumerated rights, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g “the<br />

right to nati<strong>on</strong>ality” as set forth <strong>in</strong> Article 5(d)(iii). The ICERD therefore prohibits racial discrim<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> law<br />

<strong>and</strong> practice with regard to the acquisiti<strong>on</strong>, loss <strong>and</strong> deprivati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>ality.<br />

2.8 Internati<strong>on</strong>al Covenant <strong>on</strong> Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights (New York, 16 December<br />

1966) 37<br />

The Internati<strong>on</strong>al Covenant <strong>on</strong> Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights (ICCPR) was c<strong>on</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> New York <strong>in</strong> 1966. At the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g, 167 countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g all Member States <strong>of</strong> the European Uni<strong>on</strong>, are bound by this<br />

C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>. 38<br />

Article 24(3) <strong>of</strong> the ICCPR guarantees that “[e]very child has the right to acquire a nati<strong>on</strong>ality.”<br />

The ICCPR, however, does not <strong>in</strong>dicate to which State a child may claim his or her right to nati<strong>on</strong>ality.<br />

Moreover, Article 24(3) does not specify that a child has the right to acquire a nati<strong>on</strong>ality at birth; it <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

guarantees a “right to acquire a nati<strong>on</strong>ality” (<strong>in</strong> the French language versi<strong>on</strong>, “droit d’acquérir une<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>alité”). In this respect, the provisi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the 1961 C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> are c<strong>on</strong>siderably more c<strong>on</strong>crete. 39 The<br />

ICCPR does not <strong>in</strong>clude any rule <strong>on</strong> loss or deprivati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>ality. However, the message <strong>of</strong> Article 24(3)<br />

has to be kept <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d if any loss provisi<strong>on</strong> would lead to statelessness <strong>of</strong> a child.<br />

32 Austria reserved the right to allow any <strong>of</strong> its nati<strong>on</strong>als to reta<strong>in</strong> Austrian nati<strong>on</strong>ality if a C<strong>on</strong>tract<strong>in</strong>g Party for whose<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>ality a nati<strong>on</strong>al applies gives its prior c<strong>on</strong>sent thereto.<br />

33 http://www.c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s.coe.<strong>in</strong>t/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=043&CM=1&DF=27/02/2013&CL=ENG.<br />

34 See De Groot <strong>and</strong> Schneider (2006); De Groot <strong>and</strong> V<strong>in</strong>k (2008), pp. 24-27.<br />

35 UNTS 660, 195.<br />

36 The C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> was adopted by the General Assembly <strong>of</strong> the UN <strong>in</strong> resoluti<strong>on</strong> 2106 (XX) <strong>of</strong> 21 December 1965.<br />

37 UNTS 999, 171.<br />

38 http://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&lang=en (accessed 1 July<br />

2013).<br />

39 On Art. 24(3) ICCPR, see De Groot (2012a).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!