Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Government recognized that 'it may also be more appropriate <strong>to</strong> delay particular operations <strong>to</strong><br />
benefit from new or developing technologies or from fur<strong>the</strong>r development of existing best practice,<br />
or <strong>to</strong> take advantage of radioactive decay.' The best solution should be determined on a case-by-case<br />
basis (UK Government 2004).<br />
At Sellafield a deferred decommissioning strategy for <strong>the</strong> nuclear power plants was chosen.<br />
According <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Decommissioning plan (NDA 2011b) <strong>the</strong> Calder Hall site will enter a 'care and<br />
maintenance phase' in 2024 and Windscale Pile 1 and 2 in 2030. Between 2105 and 2115 <strong>the</strong> Calder<br />
Hall site should be finally cleared. The final site clearance is planned for 2120. The care and<br />
maintenance phase means that <strong>the</strong> reac<strong>to</strong>rs buildings will be made 'safe and secure and placed under<br />
a routine surveillance schedule' until <strong>the</strong> final stage of decommissioning will start after approx. 70 <strong>to</strong><br />
80 years. This deferred decommissioning as well as <strong>the</strong> continuous decommissioning both had been<br />
shown by <strong>the</strong> Strategic Environmental Assessment <strong>to</strong> offer long-term environmental benefits, as NDA<br />
explains in its decommissioning strategy (NDA 2011c). However, NDA acknowledged in <strong>the</strong> same<br />
paper that <strong>the</strong> continuous decommissioning potentially provides <strong>the</strong> greatest benefit. Never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />
NDA chose <strong>the</strong> deferred option arguing that a care and maintenance phase will take advantage of <strong>the</strong><br />
natural radioactive decay of <strong>the</strong> nuclear materials and <strong>to</strong> allow <strong>the</strong> establishment of disposal facilities<br />
prior <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> clearance phase.<br />
3.3.2. Organisation structure of <strong>the</strong> decommissioning<br />
At Sellafield, <strong>the</strong> company Sellafield Ltd is <strong>the</strong> responsible Site License Company that manages and<br />
operates <strong>the</strong> decommissioning in Sellafield. NDA`s responsibility is <strong>to</strong> oversee Sellafield Ltd.<br />
After a 2 year phase of completion, Nuclear Management Partners (NMP) was chosen on 11 th July,<br />
2008, as a new Parent Body for Sellafield Ltd. The Nuclear Managements Partners Ltd was especially<br />
created <strong>to</strong> bid for <strong>the</strong> Sellafield PBO competition. It is a consortium of <strong>the</strong> companies URS of <strong>the</strong> US,<br />
<strong>the</strong> British AMEC, and AREVA of France. The initial contract is for five years, with extension options <strong>to</strong><br />
17 years (NDA 2008). Every five years <strong>the</strong> process will be reviewed (NDA 2011b). The NDA and NMP<br />
entered in<strong>to</strong> a contractual arrangement via a Parent Body Agreement, and <strong>the</strong> NDA and Sellafield Ltd<br />
agreed a Deed of Variation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> existing Management & Operations Contract <strong>to</strong> take account of <strong>the</strong><br />
new Parent Body arrangements.<br />
The roles and responsibility as well as <strong>the</strong> finance flows in 2011 and 2012 are shown in Figure 17.<br />
72