Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
The mentioned 9 reac<strong>to</strong>rs are of four different types (see Table 3: Development in cost estimations for<br />
<strong>the</strong> 9 reac<strong>to</strong>rs (plus s<strong>to</strong>rage facility St. Laurent) in million EUR). Cost comparison is <strong>the</strong>refore difficult<br />
because of different technical installations etc. The last estimates showed for example that <strong>the</strong> costs<br />
for dismantling of Chooz A (PWR type) are equivalent <strong>to</strong> 68 % of <strong>the</strong> average costs for <strong>the</strong> Brennilis<br />
HWR.<br />
The <strong>to</strong>tal dismantling costs for <strong>the</strong> 9 reac<strong>to</strong>rs with ancillary facilities were estimated at EUR 4 billion in<br />
2010 7 . Of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>to</strong>tal costs only EUR 1.5 billion were covered by set-aside funds, <strong>the</strong> remainder was<br />
not covered at <strong>the</strong> end of 2010 (CdC 2012).<br />
The parameters and <strong>the</strong> approach for <strong>the</strong> costs estimation by EDF<br />
To minimize <strong>the</strong> uncertainties in <strong>the</strong> costs estimates, <strong>the</strong> dismantling costs are calculated as estimates<br />
drawn up and regularly revised by EDF. The estimates are based on all <strong>the</strong> technical, financial and<br />
contractual data available at <strong>the</strong> time at which <strong>the</strong>y were made. The operations <strong>to</strong> be carried out are<br />
listed and <strong>the</strong> costs for each operation are evaluated using parameters relating <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> quantities <strong>to</strong> be<br />
processed, unit costs and completion times. Cost brackets for all <strong>the</strong>se parameters are determined<br />
and a probability of occurrence is assigned <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. A subsequent sensitivity analysis of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
parameter helps <strong>to</strong> identify <strong>the</strong> degree of uncertainty. From one revision <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> next, information<br />
from <strong>the</strong> site where <strong>the</strong> dismantling is in progress is extrapolated appropriately. Evaluation using data<br />
ga<strong>the</strong>red in <strong>the</strong> previous and current years for <strong>the</strong> engineering works, site and waste costs is<br />
subsequently carried out.<br />
In Table 3 <strong>the</strong> developments of <strong>the</strong> cost estimations for <strong>the</strong> 9 reac<strong>to</strong>rs (plus <strong>the</strong> s<strong>to</strong>rage facility<br />
St. Laurent) <strong>to</strong> be decommissioned are listed for demonstration (in CdC 2012 according <strong>to</strong> EDF data).<br />
7<br />
The <strong>to</strong>tal estimated amounts for dismantling of <strong>the</strong> reac<strong>to</strong>rs alone (without Superphénix) represents<br />
approx. 43 % of <strong>the</strong>ir construction costs (EUR 6.1 billion in 2010, overnight costs + interim interests during<br />
construction). See CdC 2012.<br />
62