14.01.2014 Views

Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs<br />

____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

While errors or failures in operational decisions can cause considerable losses or damages, errors or<br />

failures in strategic decisions have much larger consequences. That is why strategic decisions, as preplanned<br />

by <strong>the</strong> management, should be subject <strong>to</strong> a decision making under control: an independent<br />

supervisory board should:<br />

Evaluate <strong>the</strong> proposed plans;<br />

Request <strong>the</strong> presentation of alternatives <strong>to</strong> those plans;<br />

Request a risk evaluation for <strong>the</strong> technical and financial implications of <strong>the</strong> plan(s);<br />

Finally decide on <strong>the</strong> plan.<br />

The effect of double-checking strategic decisions is that all risks are better assessed and a more<br />

reasonable risk decision can be taken.<br />

To set up an effective management and control regime, it is a central requirement <strong>to</strong> define strategic<br />

decisions <strong>to</strong> be prepared by <strong>the</strong> management and finally <strong>to</strong> be decided from <strong>the</strong> control institution,<br />

and <strong>to</strong> define operational decisions <strong>to</strong> solely be decided by <strong>the</strong> management. If this discrimination is<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r not clearly defined, is not respected or is unclear:<br />

Strategic decisions are ei<strong>the</strong>r not taken (management waits for decisions of <strong>the</strong> control<br />

institution) or with a high risk of failure (management decides and acts on its own);<br />

Operational decisions are unnecessarily delayed because <strong>the</strong> control institution is unable <strong>to</strong><br />

decide, is unwilling <strong>to</strong> take every-day-decisions or decides in a wrong way due <strong>to</strong> limited expert<br />

knowledge;<br />

Operational decisions are unnecessarily decided by <strong>the</strong> control institution, with <strong>the</strong> result that<br />

<strong>the</strong> management is not responsible any more, looses competency, etc.;<br />

The responsibility for decisions cannot be clearly assigned or is diluted between two<br />

organisations that claim that ei<strong>the</strong>r none of <strong>the</strong>m or both of <strong>the</strong>m are responsible.<br />

In all <strong>the</strong> named cases sub-optimal conditions result that can cause immense difficulties for <strong>the</strong><br />

process.<br />

Figure 11 lists examples of typical strategic decisions as well as operational decisions in<br />

decommissioning.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!