Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ In which fields could the regulatory body ease your planning, technical and financial structures (should there be more detailed regulation, should there be more written regulation, etc.)? Is it difficult for you to understand the regulatory issues? How would you evaluate your relationship with the regulatory body (cautious, trustfully, distantly, frustrating)? …………………………………………….. The cooperation with the regulatory body has continued over the past 20 years and is described as very good. It is a professional but open relationship with close and regular face to face exchange. Several project phases and problems connected with the planning can be openly discussed. The contents of the discussions of the meetings are documented in minutes. The regulator is not obliged to organize these meetings; the meetings are voluntary. The operator has the opportunity to talk open about the difficulties within the project; agreements can be made already in the early stage of the relevant project phases. 164
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management of Costs and Risks ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ANNEX 5 - WRITTEN ANSWERS FROM JAVYS, SLOVAKIA (Underlined text refers to the questionnaire) The conceptual planning within the Project The overall plan of the Project, it’s major work packages, it’s ordering and serial flow, etc. It is mandatory for all Slovak nuclear power plants to prepare and periodically update Conceptual decommissioning plans already during construction and operation of the power plant. This was also the case of strategic preparedness of V1 NPP for its due decommissioning. These conceptual documents were later replaced by detailed 1 st Stage Decommissioning licence documentation and overall V1 NPP Decommissioning Strategy. Conceptual Plan: Conceptual Planning of Bohunice NPP V1 decommissioning was commenced in frame of the project titled 'Conceptual Planning'. The mentioned project was completed in 2007. Multicriterial analysis resulted in selection of the Immediate Decommissioning Option ('IDO') out of 4 analysed alternatives. This option assumes 2 decommissioning stages of Bohunice NPP V1 and decommissioning activities completion by 2025. The project was followed by consecutive activities: 1) The Environmental Impact Assessment Report of V1 NPP Decommissioning, 2) The V1 NPP Decommissioning 1st Stage Plan & Other Documentation, and 3) Decommissioning Database Later on, the outputs from abovementioned projects were used for development of the Bohunice V1 NPP Decommissioning Strategy Report (2010), later replaced by updated and renamed version called Strategy of Bohunice V1 NPP Decommissioning (described in detail below). Based on the abovementioned projects were identified and defined single decommissioning projects packets as follows: Packet of decommissioning projects (sorted by criterion: Types of activities): ”A” block: Projects related to NPP modification for decommissioning activities and development of comprehensive documentation ”B” block: ”C” block: Projects related to decommissioning licencing Projects related to wastes and RAW management ”D” block: Projects related to systems dismantling & buildings demolition (i.e. decommissioning) Packets of decommissioning projects (sorted by criterion: Implementation time frame): - Projects to be implemented in Stage 1 of Bohunice NPP V1 decommissioning (2011-2014), - Projects to be implemented in Stage 2 of Bohunice NPP V1 decommissioning (2015-2025), 165
Page 3 and 4:
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL PO
Page 5 and 6:
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 159 and 160: detailed regulation, should there b
Page 165: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 201: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
show all

Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?