Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Table 5: Evaluation results on a scale from 0 to 5 AREA ASPECTS EVALUATED BG LT SV National framework Management organisation Availability and management of national funds National control over the managing organisation’s strategic decisions Consistent structuring decommissioning of the organisation towards Internal PMU under complete control of the management 2 1 3 1 2 3 Project and risk management Project management system established, complete and applied Risk management under full control of the managing organisation 1 2 4 Regulatory approach Regulation matched to decommissioning needs Early and timely communication of plans towards regulatory agency 3 3 4 Cost planning Estimates based on detailed project work plan break down Cost estimate under full awareness of all influencing risks 4 5 4 Workforce Role of own workforce well defined and communicated Priority for own workforce and establishment of training programs 2 3 5 Country evaluation: see scale explanation Source: Authors The table shows the areas where future improvements are necessary (1..3), where further improvements are still possible (4) and where the situation is in our view optimal (5). To draw further conclusions these results are displayed in Figure 45. 134
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management of Costs and Risks ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure 45: Overall visualization of evaluations results National framework 5 4 Workforce 3 2 Management organization 1 0 BG LT SK Ideal Cost estimates Project and risk management Regulatory approach Source: Authors As can be seen from the figure the areas of the National framework and of the Management organisation are generally far from best practice. Improvements in this field are and should be primarily the task of the respective countries. 135
Page 3 and 4:
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL PO
Page 5 and 6:
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 135: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Page 159 and 160: detailed regulation, should there b
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201:
show all

Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?