Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa Link to the study - European Parliament - Europa
Policy Department D: Budgetary Affairs ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Lithuania Cost estimation of the decommissioning at Ignalina is in detail described in Harrison 2012. The estimate is based on: The Final Decommissioning Plan; A simplified model of the project, but including all project stages and cost-relevant factors; Greifswald data; 2011 prices, 2029 macroeconomic adjustment and cost escalation of technical risks. Figure 42 shows the main results of the estimate by action type (upper part) and over the time periods (lower part). Figure 42: Cost structure by activity and by phase Source: (Harrison 2012) The results are well compatible with EWN analysis. According to Harrison 2012 this latest estimate differs only insignificantly from previous estimates. All in all, the recent cost estimate is state-of-the-art. Slovakia In 2006, at the beginning of the decommissioning project a long term costs analysis was developed. A more comprehensive cost analyses was later prepared and reviewed by external bodies. The Bohunice V1 NPP Decommissioning Cost Analysis that identified the costs needed was developed in 2011 (Aid 2013). The analysis was based on the key documentation 'Conceptual decommissioning plan', 120
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management of Costs and Risks ____________________________________________________________________________________________ as performed in cooperation with EWN (see ANNEX 5). This analysis identified that there is a substantial need for further funding of EUR 300 million of the V1 NPP Bohunice decommissioning process at that time. The most recent cost analysis estimated the total costs for the decommissioning from 2003 until 2025 to be EUR 1 141 million (including the spent fuel wet storage costs).The direct decommissioning costs sum up to EUR 868 million and the costs incurred due to premature shutdown to EUR 273 million respectively (JAVYS 2013). The costs due to premature shutdown were calculated as follows (JAVYS 2013): The V1 nuclear power plant (which is made of two units) should normally have remained in operation until 2015. But as mentioned earlier the Unit 1 was shut down in December 2006 and the Unit 2 in December 2008 respectively. A National Nuclear Fund for Decommissioning (NNF) was established in 2006 according to the Act No. 238/2006 Coll. (Act 2006, see also chapter 4.3.1). So the operator paid contributions to the NNF until to December 2006 for the operation of the two blocks and only for the remaining block until December 2008. The overall estimated costs and their share to different resources are shown in Figure 43. The EU pays the decommissioning costs firstly to the Bohunice International Decommissioning Support Fund (BIDSF) which is administrated by EBRD. This total financial support is about EUR 348 million. The BIDSF further covers the costs of EUR 100 million which are not granted. Figure 43: The overall costs divided according to the financial resources and taking into account the expenses being still not covered Source: (JAVYS 2013) National resources need to cover the costs of EUR 363 million. Additionally about EUR 200 million will be supported by EU from 2014 until 2020. A remaining gap of EUR 129 million is still not covered. Due to development of several strategies how to cover the costs and/or due to a more accurate cost estimation the aforementioned estimated remaining gap of EUR 300 million was reduced. According to JAVYS 2013 the relation between the costs covered by BIDSF and NNF shifted from 54 %/46 % (BIDSF/NNF) in 2011 towards 42 %/59 % (BIDSF/NNF) in 2012. 121
- Page 71 and 72: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 73 and 74: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 75 and 76: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 77 and 78: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 79 and 80: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 81 and 82: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 83 and 84: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 85 and 86: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 87 and 88: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 89 and 90: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 91 and 92: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 93 and 94: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 95 and 96: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 97 and 98: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 99 and 100: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 101 and 102: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 103 and 104: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 105 and 106: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 107 and 108: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 109 and 110: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 111 and 112: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 113 and 114: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 115 and 116: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 117 and 118: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 119 and 120: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 121: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 125 and 126: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 127 and 128: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 129 and 130: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 131 and 132: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 133 and 134: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 135 and 136: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 137 and 138: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 139 and 140: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 141 and 142: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 143 and 144: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 145 and 146: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 147 and 148: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 149 and 150: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 151 and 152: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 153 and 154: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 155 and 156: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 157 and 158: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 159 and 160: detailed regulation, should there b
- Page 161 and 162: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 163 and 164: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 165 and 166: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 167 and 168: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 169 and 170: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
- Page 171 and 172: Nuclear Decommissioning: Management
Nuclear Decommissioning: Management of Costs and Risks<br />
____________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
as performed in cooperation with EWN (see ANNEX 5). This analysis identified that <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />
substantial need for fur<strong>the</strong>r funding of EUR 300 million of <strong>the</strong> V1 NPP Bohunice decommissioning<br />
process at that time.<br />
The most recent cost analysis estimated <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal costs for <strong>the</strong> decommissioning from 2003 until 2025<br />
<strong>to</strong> be EUR 1 141 million (including <strong>the</strong> spent fuel wet s<strong>to</strong>rage costs).The direct decommissioning costs<br />
sum up <strong>to</strong> EUR 868 million and <strong>the</strong> costs incurred due <strong>to</strong> premature shutdown <strong>to</strong> EUR 273 million<br />
respectively (JAVYS 2013).<br />
The costs due <strong>to</strong> premature shutdown were calculated as follows (JAVYS 2013): The V1 nuclear power<br />
plant (which is made of two units) should normally have remained in operation until 2015. But as<br />
mentioned earlier <strong>the</strong> Unit 1 was shut down in December 2006 and <strong>the</strong> Unit 2 in December 2008<br />
respectively. A National Nuclear Fund for Decommissioning (NNF) was established in 2006 according<br />
<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Act No. 238/2006 Coll. (Act 2006, see also chapter 4.3.1). So <strong>the</strong> opera<strong>to</strong>r paid contributions <strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> NNF until <strong>to</strong> December 2006 for <strong>the</strong> operation of <strong>the</strong> two blocks and only for <strong>the</strong> remaining block<br />
until December 2008.<br />
The overall estimated costs and <strong>the</strong>ir share <strong>to</strong> different resources are shown in Figure 43. The EU pays<br />
<strong>the</strong> decommissioning costs firstly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bohunice International Decommissioning Support Fund<br />
(BIDSF) which is administrated by EBRD. This <strong>to</strong>tal financial support is about EUR 348 million. The<br />
BIDSF fur<strong>the</strong>r covers <strong>the</strong> costs of EUR 100 million which are not granted.<br />
Figure 43: The overall costs divided according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial resources and taking in<strong>to</strong><br />
account <strong>the</strong> expenses being still not covered<br />
Source: (JAVYS 2013)<br />
National resources need <strong>to</strong> cover <strong>the</strong> costs of EUR 363 million. Additionally about EUR 200 million will<br />
be supported by EU from 2014 until 2020. A remaining gap of EUR 129 million is still not covered. Due<br />
<strong>to</strong> development of several strategies how <strong>to</strong> cover <strong>the</strong> costs and/or due <strong>to</strong> a more accurate cost<br />
estimation <strong>the</strong> aforementioned estimated remaining gap of EUR 300 million was reduced.<br />
According <strong>to</strong> JAVYS 2013 <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong> costs covered by BIDSF and NNF shifted from<br />
54 %/46 % (BIDSF/NNF) in 2011 <strong>to</strong>wards 42 %/59 % (BIDSF/NNF) in 2012.<br />
121