14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

intellectual and scientific abilities. For contrast, I will juxtaposition these<br />

negative images <strong>of</strong> women with positive images <strong>of</strong> male scientists in which<br />

they are depicted as heroes <strong>of</strong> modern life. By examining images <strong>of</strong> science<br />

popularization, I demonstrate that the popularizers’ conception <strong>of</strong> women<br />

replicated and defended that <strong>of</strong> the dominant middle class. <strong>Science</strong><br />

popularization in France in this period thus simultaneously promoted science<br />

and a negative stereotype <strong>of</strong> women.<br />

Sungook Hong Institute for the <strong>History</strong> and Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and<br />

Technology, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

‘One Faith, One Weight, One Measure’:<br />

Language and the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Units and Standards<br />

My paper aims to examine a recurrent narrative in the history <strong>of</strong> units and<br />

standards. It is a comparison between the existence <strong>of</strong> different languages and<br />

lexicons, on the one hand, and the existence <strong>of</strong> diverse (and therefore the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> the standard) weights and measures, on the other. For example, John Swinton<br />

stated in 1779 that “people who use measures differing both in size and name<br />

speak as it were different languages.” My paper traces various appearances <strong>of</strong><br />

this narrative in John Swinton, John Riggs Miller who wrote the book<br />

Equalization <strong>of</strong> the Weights and Measures <strong>of</strong> Great Britain (1790), John<br />

Frederick William Herschel’s Preliminary Discourse, James Clerk Maxwell’s<br />

article on “Atom,” John Ambrose Fleming’s proposal for the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

the Standardizing Laboratory, and William Thomson’s 1883 lecture on<br />

“Electrical Units <strong>of</strong> Measurement.” I will show that some changes in this<br />

“linguistic metaphor” through the 18th and 19th centuries were associated<br />

with, and mutually reinforced, the idea <strong>of</strong> “natural” units and standards.<br />

Nicole␣ C. Howard Indiana University<br />

The King, the Courtier and the Clockmaker:<br />

Christiaan Huygens and Interpretations <strong>of</strong> Audience<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> the intended audience <strong>of</strong> a book is one which has recently gained the<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> historians <strong>of</strong> science. In many cases, natural philosophers had in mind<br />

a range <strong>of</strong> individuals—be they from a religious, political, or philosophical<br />

background—whom they wanted to speak to through their work. Therefore,<br />

understanding who the author had in mind as their readership can provide an<br />

important insight into how they wanted their book to be received and read, and<br />

may reveal the importance <strong>of</strong> specific parts <strong>of</strong> a work for different individuals. My<br />

aim in this talk is to examine such authorial intentions by looking at two <strong>of</strong> Christiaan<br />

Huygens’ books on the pendulum clock, the Horologium published in 1658 and<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!