2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
intellectual and scientific abilities. For contrast, I will juxtaposition these<br />
negative images <strong>of</strong> women with positive images <strong>of</strong> male scientists in which<br />
they are depicted as heroes <strong>of</strong> modern life. By examining images <strong>of</strong> science<br />
popularization, I demonstrate that the popularizers’ conception <strong>of</strong> women<br />
replicated and defended that <strong>of</strong> the dominant middle class. <strong>Science</strong><br />
popularization in France in this period thus simultaneously promoted science<br />
and a negative stereotype <strong>of</strong> women.<br />
Sungook Hong Institute for the <strong>History</strong> and Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and<br />
Technology, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
‘One Faith, One Weight, One Measure’:<br />
Language and the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Units and Standards<br />
My paper aims to examine a recurrent narrative in the history <strong>of</strong> units and<br />
standards. It is a comparison between the existence <strong>of</strong> different languages and<br />
lexicons, on the one hand, and the existence <strong>of</strong> diverse (and therefore the lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> the standard) weights and measures, on the other. For example, John Swinton<br />
stated in 1779 that “people who use measures differing both in size and name<br />
speak as it were different languages.” My paper traces various appearances <strong>of</strong><br />
this narrative in John Swinton, John Riggs Miller who wrote the book<br />
Equalization <strong>of</strong> the Weights and Measures <strong>of</strong> Great Britain (1790), John<br />
Frederick William Herschel’s Preliminary Discourse, James Clerk Maxwell’s<br />
article on “Atom,” John Ambrose Fleming’s proposal for the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
the Standardizing Laboratory, and William Thomson’s 1883 lecture on<br />
“Electrical Units <strong>of</strong> Measurement.” I will show that some changes in this<br />
“linguistic metaphor” through the 18th and 19th centuries were associated<br />
with, and mutually reinforced, the idea <strong>of</strong> “natural” units and standards.<br />
Nicole␣ C. Howard Indiana University<br />
The King, the Courtier and the Clockmaker:<br />
Christiaan Huygens and Interpretations <strong>of</strong> Audience<br />
The issue <strong>of</strong> the intended audience <strong>of</strong> a book is one which has recently gained the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> historians <strong>of</strong> science. In many cases, natural philosophers had in mind<br />
a range <strong>of</strong> individuals—be they from a religious, political, or philosophical<br />
background—whom they wanted to speak to through their work. Therefore,<br />
understanding who the author had in mind as their readership can provide an<br />
important insight into how they wanted their book to be received and read, and<br />
may reveal the importance <strong>of</strong> specific parts <strong>of</strong> a work for different individuals. My<br />
aim in this talk is to examine such authorial intentions by looking at two <strong>of</strong> Christiaan<br />
Huygens’ books on the pendulum clock, the Horologium published in 1658 and<br />
97