2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Marianne␣ P. Fedunki Stevens Institute for <strong>History</strong> and Philosophy<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Technology<br />
Malaria and 20th Century Medicine: Fighting Disease with Film, 1940-<br />
<strong>2000</strong><br />
This paper examines the role <strong>of</strong> film in educating scientists, clinicians, and the<br />
general public about the transmission <strong>of</strong> malaria from 1940 to the present. The<br />
films were produced as both public health propaganda and as scientific/clinical<br />
training films directed at a specialized audience. They include both basic and<br />
applied science as well as material for general Western and indigenous audiences.<br />
I will set these films within their colonial and later post-colonial frames <strong>of</strong><br />
discourse and also evaluate the films’ impact on their target audiences, plus the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> foundation sponsorship in producing and distributing them. Archival<br />
sources for this study include: The Wellcome Trust (London), Imperial War<br />
Museum, Shell Centre (London), British Film Institute, World Health<br />
Organization, and Liverpool School <strong>of</strong> Tropical Medicine. This paper is part <strong>of</strong><br />
a larger study <strong>of</strong> how film served as a way to disseminate “colonialist science,”<br />
particularly in East Africa. There is a large body <strong>of</strong> anti-malaria films, including<br />
even a contribution by Walt Disney Productions, “The Winged Scourge” (1943)<br />
Mordechai Feingold Virginia Tech<br />
Scientists and Amateurs in Seventeenth-Century England<br />
In her Scientists and Amateurs: A <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Royal <strong>Society</strong> (1949), Dorothy<br />
Stimson differentiated the few “true” scientists from a much larger group <strong>of</strong><br />
practitioners who satisfied “their curiosity rather than attempting to pursue<br />
scientific learning.” For the latter, she argued, science was “a recreation in<br />
which they delighted, not an activity to which they devoted their whole time<br />
and thought” , though they served an important role as “a welcoming audience<br />
for the new discoveries” and as patrons to scientists. The passage <strong>of</strong> time has<br />
done little to dispel such an image and my paper intends to probe the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
the scientific community during the seventeenth century in an effort to<br />
demonstrate that “amateurism” was a function <strong>of</strong> social or pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
standing, not an indication <strong>of</strong> competence.<br />
80<br />
Maurice␣ A. Finocchiaro University <strong>of</strong> Nevada—Las Vegas<br />
Giordano Bruno, 1600-<strong>2000</strong><br />
Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake in Rome in the year 1600, and this year<br />
(<strong>2000</strong>) several organizations are commemorating the four-hundredth anniversary