2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
William␣ A. Durbin Washington Theological Union<br />
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Rome’s Second Galileo:<br />
Father John Zahm’s Abortive Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Evolution and Faith<br />
The paper highlights the efforts <strong>of</strong> Rev. John Zahm, C.S.C., priest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Congregation <strong>of</strong> the Holy Cross and Notre Dame pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> physics and<br />
chemistry, to champion the theory <strong>of</strong> evolution in Catholic circles in late<br />
nineteenth century America. Fr. Zahm’s articulate, informed and short-lived<br />
crusade to reconcile evolutionary science with Catholic tradition, coming as it<br />
did in the anti-liberal, ultramontanist atmosphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial Catholicism, <strong>of</strong>fers<br />
striking parallels to the Galileo case. The pattern <strong>of</strong> controversy in both “affairs”<br />
reveals a persistent, defining issue in the science-religion relation as the claim<br />
to the right <strong>of</strong> interpretation. Zahm, leading a small coterie <strong>of</strong> like-minded<br />
priest-scientists, asserted his authority to reinterpret Catholic theology in light<br />
<strong>of</strong> his interpretation <strong>of</strong> evolution. His educational agenda, his status as a<br />
practicing scientist, his position as priest in a religious order, his flair for<br />
popularization, his sense <strong>of</strong> vocation as a public intellectual, and his allegiance<br />
to an Americanist view <strong>of</strong> the church—together sketch the complex framework<br />
<strong>of</strong> his adjudicating role. Fr. Zahm’s quick rise and fall in this role spotlight<br />
peculiarly Catholic forms <strong>of</strong> interpretive authority while suggesting elements<br />
common to other Christian traditions. In the end, Zahm’s case indicates that<br />
neither he nor Galileo were as much martyrs for science, or victims <strong>of</strong> religion,<br />
as ill-fated advocates <strong>of</strong> a new magisterium.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
William Eamon New Mxico State University<br />
“Amateur <strong>Science</strong>” in the Piazza:<br />
The Scientific Underworld <strong>of</strong> Sixteenth-Century Italy<br />
The early modern scientific community consisted not only <strong>of</strong> practitioners <strong>of</strong><br />
the traditional and established scientific disciplines—astronomy, mathematics,<br />
optics, medicine, etc.—but <strong>of</strong> a much larger community <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
“amateurs,” including alchemists, distillers, pharmacists, craftsmen, artists,<br />
and virtuosi. My paper will explore this underground community <strong>of</strong> “amateur<br />
scientists” in sixteenth-century Italy by looking at the intellectual circles <strong>of</strong><br />
the surgeon and natural philosopher Leonardo Fioravanti (1517- c. 1588). From<br />
Naples to Venice, Fioravanti engaged with like-minded experimenters who<br />
engaged in a great hunt for “secrets <strong>of</strong> nature.” Although he failed in his various<br />
attempts to find a princely patron, and was thus excluded from courtly scientific<br />
circles, Fioravanti became a part <strong>of</strong> informal experimental academies in several<br />
different cities. In my paper, I shall attempt to reconstruct Fioravanti’s various<br />
circles and “academies” in Italy and Spain, basing my research on a database<br />
<strong>of</strong> several hundred names <strong>of</strong> individuals whom Fioravanti mentions in his<br />
75