14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

William␣ A. Durbin Washington Theological Union<br />

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Rome’s Second Galileo:<br />

Father John Zahm’s Abortive Synthesis <strong>of</strong> Evolution and Faith<br />

The paper highlights the efforts <strong>of</strong> Rev. John Zahm, C.S.C., priest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Congregation <strong>of</strong> the Holy Cross and Notre Dame pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> physics and<br />

chemistry, to champion the theory <strong>of</strong> evolution in Catholic circles in late<br />

nineteenth century America. Fr. Zahm’s articulate, informed and short-lived<br />

crusade to reconcile evolutionary science with Catholic tradition, coming as it<br />

did in the anti-liberal, ultramontanist atmosphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial Catholicism, <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

striking parallels to the Galileo case. The pattern <strong>of</strong> controversy in both “affairs”<br />

reveals a persistent, defining issue in the science-religion relation as the claim<br />

to the right <strong>of</strong> interpretation. Zahm, leading a small coterie <strong>of</strong> like-minded<br />

priest-scientists, asserted his authority to reinterpret Catholic theology in light<br />

<strong>of</strong> his interpretation <strong>of</strong> evolution. His educational agenda, his status as a<br />

practicing scientist, his position as priest in a religious order, his flair for<br />

popularization, his sense <strong>of</strong> vocation as a public intellectual, and his allegiance<br />

to an Americanist view <strong>of</strong> the church—together sketch the complex framework<br />

<strong>of</strong> his adjudicating role. Fr. Zahm’s quick rise and fall in this role spotlight<br />

peculiarly Catholic forms <strong>of</strong> interpretive authority while suggesting elements<br />

common to other Christian traditions. In the end, Zahm’s case indicates that<br />

neither he nor Galileo were as much martyrs for science, or victims <strong>of</strong> religion,<br />

as ill-fated advocates <strong>of</strong> a new magisterium.<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

William Eamon New Mxico State University<br />

“Amateur <strong>Science</strong>” in the Piazza:<br />

The Scientific Underworld <strong>of</strong> Sixteenth-Century Italy<br />

The early modern scientific community consisted not only <strong>of</strong> practitioners <strong>of</strong><br />

the traditional and established scientific disciplines—astronomy, mathematics,<br />

optics, medicine, etc.—but <strong>of</strong> a much larger community <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

“amateurs,” including alchemists, distillers, pharmacists, craftsmen, artists,<br />

and virtuosi. My paper will explore this underground community <strong>of</strong> “amateur<br />

scientists” in sixteenth-century Italy by looking at the intellectual circles <strong>of</strong><br />

the surgeon and natural philosopher Leonardo Fioravanti (1517- c. 1588). From<br />

Naples to Venice, Fioravanti engaged with like-minded experimenters who<br />

engaged in a great hunt for “secrets <strong>of</strong> nature.” Although he failed in his various<br />

attempts to find a princely patron, and was thus excluded from courtly scientific<br />

circles, Fioravanti became a part <strong>of</strong> informal experimental academies in several<br />

different cities. In my paper, I shall attempt to reconstruct Fioravanti’s various<br />

circles and “academies” in Italy and Spain, basing my research on a database<br />

<strong>of</strong> several hundred names <strong>of</strong> individuals whom Fioravanti mentions in his<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!