2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
or correction a posteriori. This ideal created a paradoxical situation in which<br />
the experimenter wished to control every single aspect <strong>of</strong> experimentation,<br />
but at the same time aimed at complete self-effacement, considering himself<br />
the ultimate source <strong>of</strong> all disturbances: nature dictated the course <strong>of</strong><br />
investigation and enslaved the experimenter. Regnault’s ideal was an aseptic<br />
experiment, free <strong>of</strong> human contamination, in which the scientist assumed only<br />
the role <strong>of</strong> catalyst, letting nature perform without interference. Given that<br />
contemporaries <strong>of</strong> the 1840s considered Regnault to be Europe’s most<br />
outstanding experimentalist, Regnault’s relentless pursuit to provide a basis<br />
for objective knowledge in experimentation and to make nature speak<br />
unambiguously characterise the (short-lived) hopes for absolute certainty <strong>of</strong> a<br />
whole generation <strong>of</strong> experimentalists.<br />
Sven Dupre Ghent University<br />
Galileo, Optics and the Pinelli Circle<br />
Beside Galileo’s training in perspective with Ostilio Ricci, early in his career,<br />
as shown by Settle, and the scarce evidence <strong>of</strong>fered by the books on optics<br />
present in Galileo’s library, as shown by Favaro, little is known about the<br />
immediate context <strong>of</strong> Galileo’s optics before he began improving the Dutch<br />
telescope in 1609. This paper will propose a study <strong>of</strong> the texts and knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> optics circulating in the circle <strong>of</strong> Gian Vincenzo Pinelli, a patron and avid<br />
book and manuscript collector, Galileo became involved with from his early<br />
days in Padua during the last decade <strong>of</strong> the sixteenth century. Among many<br />
other things, Pinelli owned the unpublished manuscripts, consisting <strong>of</strong> lecture<br />
notes and drafts <strong>of</strong> book chapters, on optics <strong>of</strong> Ettore Ausonio and Giuseppe<br />
Moleto, the latter a pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> mathematics at the university <strong>of</strong> Padua and a<br />
student <strong>of</strong> Maurolico, and the first a mathematician and physician from Venice.<br />
That Pinelli took an interest in optics, is shown, on the one hand, by his<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> mathematical instruments, and, on the other, by his own copying<br />
<strong>of</strong> notes <strong>of</strong> Moleto and his annotations to the “Trattato della Pittura” <strong>of</strong><br />
Leonardo. However, also Galileo, who would have had access to Pinelli’s<br />
library, was attracted by the wealth <strong>of</strong> optical information present in this library,<br />
as is shown by his copying <strong>of</strong> Ausonio’s “Theorica speculi concavi sphaerici”<br />
. By presenting the optics circulating in the Pinelli circle from hitherto unstudied<br />
manuscripts, this paper will try to uncover the immediate optical context at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the sixteenth century from which Galileo emerged. Finally, this<br />
paper will try to establish to what extent the optics circulating in Galileo’s<br />
information network at this particular moment in his career might have been<br />
useful to his own optical work.<br />
74