2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Vancouver I will demonstrate the connection between text and visual image<br />
by examining a particular image and its accompanying text in early editions<br />
(1561 to 1584) <strong>of</strong> Eden’s Arte <strong>of</strong> Navigation alongside the textual emendations<br />
that mark the image’s disappearance in a later edition (1596). I will also argue<br />
that the multi-layered and moveable visual images in this text may be the<br />
most important element in facilitating the student navigator’s progress from<br />
student to practising mariner because they occupy a position between mere<br />
representation and three dimensional model. By examining the relationship<br />
between text and image, between image and reader, we can enhance our<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> literate practices among a class <strong>of</strong> artisans<br />
more devoted to the life <strong>of</strong> the hand than to the life <strong>of</strong> the mind.<br />
Edward␣ B. Davis Messiah College<br />
<strong>Science</strong> and Religion, Chicago Style:<br />
Liberal Protestants and <strong>Science</strong> in the Age <strong>of</strong> Bryan<br />
In February 1922, William Jennings Bryan’s popular assault on evolution went<br />
upscale, when the New York Times published his essay, “God and Evolution.”<br />
This drew almost immediate responses from biologist Edwin Grant Conklin,<br />
paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn, and Protestant pastor Harry Emerson<br />
Fosdick. Shortly after this, the essays by Conklin and Fosdick were reprinted<br />
as the inaugural numbers in what would become a series <strong>of</strong> nine “Popular<br />
Religion Leaflets” on “<strong>Science</strong> and Religion,” published between 1922 and<br />
1931 by the American Institute <strong>of</strong> Sacred Literature, a correspondence arm <strong>of</strong><br />
the University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Divinity School. Shailer Mathews supervised the<br />
series and wrote one <strong>of</strong> the pamphlets himself Fosdick later wrote a second.<br />
The other five were written by prominent American scientists: Robert A.<br />
Millikan, Kirtley Mather, Edwin Frost, Michael Pupin, and Samuel Christian<br />
Schmucker. A tenth pamphlet, co-authored by Mathews, Arthur Holly Compton,<br />
and Charles Gilkey, is closely related but not actually part <strong>of</strong> the series. Although<br />
the pamphlets were underwritten by John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and distributed<br />
very widely, they are virtually unknown to both historians <strong>of</strong> science and<br />
historians <strong>of</strong> religion. This paper tells how the pamphlets were found, sketches<br />
their history, and analyzes their highly interesting content, placing them in the<br />
larger context <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Christian thinking about science.<br />
70<br />
Edward␣ B. Davis Messiah College<br />
Teaching Religion and <strong>Science</strong><br />
In the past few years, dozens <strong>of</strong> historians and philosophers <strong>of</strong> science<br />
(including the author <strong>of</strong> this paper) have developed courses on religion and