14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Vancouver I will demonstrate the connection between text and visual image<br />

by examining a particular image and its accompanying text in early editions<br />

(1561 to 1584) <strong>of</strong> Eden’s Arte <strong>of</strong> Navigation alongside the textual emendations<br />

that mark the image’s disappearance in a later edition (1596). I will also argue<br />

that the multi-layered and moveable visual images in this text may be the<br />

most important element in facilitating the student navigator’s progress from<br />

student to practising mariner because they occupy a position between mere<br />

representation and three dimensional model. By examining the relationship<br />

between text and image, between image and reader, we can enhance our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> literate practices among a class <strong>of</strong> artisans<br />

more devoted to the life <strong>of</strong> the hand than to the life <strong>of</strong> the mind.<br />

Edward␣ B. Davis Messiah College<br />

<strong>Science</strong> and Religion, Chicago Style:<br />

Liberal Protestants and <strong>Science</strong> in the Age <strong>of</strong> Bryan<br />

In February 1922, William Jennings Bryan’s popular assault on evolution went<br />

upscale, when the New York Times published his essay, “God and Evolution.”<br />

This drew almost immediate responses from biologist Edwin Grant Conklin,<br />

paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn, and Protestant pastor Harry Emerson<br />

Fosdick. Shortly after this, the essays by Conklin and Fosdick were reprinted<br />

as the inaugural numbers in what would become a series <strong>of</strong> nine “Popular<br />

Religion Leaflets” on “<strong>Science</strong> and Religion,” published between 1922 and<br />

1931 by the American Institute <strong>of</strong> Sacred Literature, a correspondence arm <strong>of</strong><br />

the University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Divinity School. Shailer Mathews supervised the<br />

series and wrote one <strong>of</strong> the pamphlets himself Fosdick later wrote a second.<br />

The other five were written by prominent American scientists: Robert A.<br />

Millikan, Kirtley Mather, Edwin Frost, Michael Pupin, and Samuel Christian<br />

Schmucker. A tenth pamphlet, co-authored by Mathews, Arthur Holly Compton,<br />

and Charles Gilkey, is closely related but not actually part <strong>of</strong> the series. Although<br />

the pamphlets were underwritten by John D. Rockefeller, Jr., and distributed<br />

very widely, they are virtually unknown to both historians <strong>of</strong> science and<br />

historians <strong>of</strong> religion. This paper tells how the pamphlets were found, sketches<br />

their history, and analyzes their highly interesting content, placing them in the<br />

larger context <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Christian thinking about science.<br />

70<br />

Edward␣ B. Davis Messiah College<br />

Teaching Religion and <strong>Science</strong><br />

In the past few years, dozens <strong>of</strong> historians and philosophers <strong>of</strong> science<br />

(including the author <strong>of</strong> this paper) have developed courses on religion and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!