2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
examine the detailed debates within the SPR concerning scientific method<br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> apparatus that arose around, for example, the exposure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fraudulent medium Eusapia Palladino in the mid-1890s. Investigators such as<br />
Oliver Lodge and Henry and Eleanor Sidgwick began to reexamine their<br />
positions concerning the integration <strong>of</strong> apparatus into experimentation on the<br />
phenomena. Standard uses <strong>of</strong> technologies in psychical research had focused<br />
on both measuring effects and controlling the medium. Oliver Lodge and the<br />
conjurer J. N. Maskelyne explored the ways in which experimental apparatus<br />
could be used against investigators to produce fraudulent effects—leading<br />
Lodge to conclude that uses <strong>of</strong> technology in investigation might distract the<br />
observer more than assuring the validity <strong>of</strong> results. In conjunction with this,<br />
debates concerning the relative validity <strong>of</strong> spirit photography in the 1920s<br />
brought issues <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> apparatus and instruments in psychical research to<br />
the fore. Scientists like Lodge, who had been at the forefront <strong>of</strong> improving the<br />
apparatus, films and techniques <strong>of</strong> x-ray photography for both diagnostic and<br />
research purposes, flatly rejected the utility <strong>of</strong> photography for the recording<br />
<strong>of</strong> spirit phenomena. Finally, this paper will conclude with the argument that<br />
a renaissance <strong>of</strong> the experimental techniques, methods, and apparatus employed<br />
by the SPR in the 1880s and 1890s (when its research program emphasized<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> experimental technologies) occurred in the 1920s and<br />
1930s. Research programs based at Duke, Princeton, and the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Pennsylvania explicitly drew upon the technologies and methods employed<br />
by the SPR to investigate psychic phenomena.<br />
66<br />
Deborah␣ R. Coen Harvard University<br />
Taking Nature’s Pulse: The Place <strong>of</strong> the Organic in Austrian Physics<br />
In answer to his question “What is Life?” Erwin Schrödinger located the<br />
uniqueness <strong>of</strong> living things in the balance between the persistence <strong>of</strong> their<br />
general forms and their potential for random variation. This vision <strong>of</strong> variability<br />
as the signature <strong>of</strong> the organic will be the focus <strong>of</strong> my talk. In the nineteenth<br />
century, writers in German from Goethe and Schelling to Houston Stewart<br />
Chamberlain sought the essence <strong>of</strong> the organic in nature’s fluctuations—from<br />
the rise and fall <strong>of</strong> a barometer, to changes in seasonal temperatures from year<br />
to year, to physical variations between members <strong>of</strong> the same species. My talk<br />
will consider how nature’s fluctuations turned from a literary trope associated<br />
with Naturphilosophie into a new field <strong>of</strong> twentieth-century physics, that <strong>of</strong><br />
Schwankungserscheinungen. Breaking with the firmly entrenched method <strong>of</strong><br />
paring away the “scatter” in experimental measurements to focus on the<br />
“normal” value, Schrödinger was among a group <strong>of</strong> German-speaking<br />
physicists who came to treat fluctuations as phenomena in their own right. In<br />
radioactivity, for example, instead <strong>of</strong> imposing regularity on their measurements<br />
like colleagues abroad, Schrödinger and his Viennese collaborators mapped