2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Jorge␣ Canizares Esguerra SUNY, Buffalo<br />
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Postcolonial Nature:<br />
Nature Narratives and Nation-Building in 19th-century Latin America.<br />
In the nineteenth century, Latin American countries faced the challenge <strong>of</strong><br />
building nations out <strong>of</strong> scratch while contending with a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> centrifugal<br />
forces tearing them apart. Historical narratives, we are now told, have been<br />
central to the emergence <strong>of</strong> nations as communities <strong>of</strong> citizens. Historical<br />
narratives have also proved important in their undoing. “Nature” narratives might<br />
have played a similar role by either facilitating or obstructing the consolidation<br />
<strong>of</strong> these imagined communities. The search for “typical” local, regional, and<br />
national landscapes, the surveying and mapping <strong>of</strong> territories, the study <strong>of</strong> how<br />
climate affects labor, culture, and the economy exercised the imagination <strong>of</strong><br />
Latin Americans in the nineteenth century. I seek to explore how these processes<br />
both facilitated and impeded the emergence <strong>of</strong> the new nations.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Cong Cao University <strong>of</strong> Oregon<br />
Ideology and Chinese <strong>Science</strong><br />
In the early years <strong>of</strong> the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong> China, scientific disciplines<br />
were claimed to carry distinctive ideological character. The Communist Party<br />
promoted one school while devaluing others from an ideological rather than a<br />
scientific standpoint. The domination <strong>of</strong> Lysenko biology and the suppression<br />
<strong>of</strong> Morgan’s genetics in China during the 1950s and 1960s are a welldocumented<br />
example. The paper is going to review other cases—the ban <strong>of</strong><br />
sociology, the criticism <strong>of</strong> Pauling’s theory <strong>of</strong> the chemical bond and the attack<br />
<strong>of</strong> Einstein’s theory <strong>of</strong> relativity, and answer the question <strong>of</strong> why ideology<br />
came into play in Chinese science. It is the Soviet influence, the difference in<br />
the training <strong>of</strong> Chinese scientists and China’s political climate that made a<br />
field proletarian or revolutionary, and bourgeois or reactionary, which resulted<br />
in the different destination for the field and for scientists working on it.<br />
John Carson University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />
Peace Work: Intelligence, Merit, and the Limits <strong>of</strong> Democracy<br />
In this paper, I will examine in detail one part <strong>of</strong> this story <strong>of</strong> the co-production<br />
<strong>of</strong> notions <strong>of</strong> merit and social order, the development <strong>of</strong> the civilian group<br />
intelligence test in the United States and the reverberations its deployment and<br />
use on a mass scale engendered in the inter-war period. To its promoters,<br />
measurements <strong>of</strong> intelligence promised simultaneously to reveal one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
61