14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jorge␣ Canizares Esguerra SUNY, Buffalo<br />

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Postcolonial Nature:<br />

Nature Narratives and Nation-Building in 19th-century Latin America.<br />

In the nineteenth century, Latin American countries faced the challenge <strong>of</strong><br />

building nations out <strong>of</strong> scratch while contending with a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> centrifugal<br />

forces tearing them apart. Historical narratives, we are now told, have been<br />

central to the emergence <strong>of</strong> nations as communities <strong>of</strong> citizens. Historical<br />

narratives have also proved important in their undoing. “Nature” narratives might<br />

have played a similar role by either facilitating or obstructing the consolidation<br />

<strong>of</strong> these imagined communities. The search for “typical” local, regional, and<br />

national landscapes, the surveying and mapping <strong>of</strong> territories, the study <strong>of</strong> how<br />

climate affects labor, culture, and the economy exercised the imagination <strong>of</strong><br />

Latin Americans in the nineteenth century. I seek to explore how these processes<br />

both facilitated and impeded the emergence <strong>of</strong> the new nations.<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Cong Cao University <strong>of</strong> Oregon<br />

Ideology and Chinese <strong>Science</strong><br />

In the early years <strong>of</strong> the People’s Republic <strong>of</strong> China, scientific disciplines<br />

were claimed to carry distinctive ideological character. The Communist Party<br />

promoted one school while devaluing others from an ideological rather than a<br />

scientific standpoint. The domination <strong>of</strong> Lysenko biology and the suppression<br />

<strong>of</strong> Morgan’s genetics in China during the 1950s and 1960s are a welldocumented<br />

example. The paper is going to review other cases—the ban <strong>of</strong><br />

sociology, the criticism <strong>of</strong> Pauling’s theory <strong>of</strong> the chemical bond and the attack<br />

<strong>of</strong> Einstein’s theory <strong>of</strong> relativity, and answer the question <strong>of</strong> why ideology<br />

came into play in Chinese science. It is the Soviet influence, the difference in<br />

the training <strong>of</strong> Chinese scientists and China’s political climate that made a<br />

field proletarian or revolutionary, and bourgeois or reactionary, which resulted<br />

in the different destination for the field and for scientists working on it.<br />

John Carson University <strong>of</strong> Michigan<br />

Peace Work: Intelligence, Merit, and the Limits <strong>of</strong> Democracy<br />

In this paper, I will examine in detail one part <strong>of</strong> this story <strong>of</strong> the co-production<br />

<strong>of</strong> notions <strong>of</strong> merit and social order, the development <strong>of</strong> the civilian group<br />

intelligence test in the United States and the reverberations its deployment and<br />

use on a mass scale engendered in the inter-war period. To its promoters,<br />

measurements <strong>of</strong> intelligence promised simultaneously to reveal one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!