14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

experimental data in the “Biochemistry and Morphogenesis” (1942), the<br />

successor to his 1931 three-volume work “Chemical Embryology” in which<br />

he had first introduced the new area <strong>of</strong> the chemical basis <strong>of</strong> ontogeny. The<br />

essential difference to Continental experimental embryology was, however,<br />

that the British School identified the inducing agent with a biochemical<br />

attractor, the so-called masked evocator. By contrasting these two different<br />

styles <strong>of</strong> scientific thought, the talk will address some further questions, e.g.,<br />

why Spemann did not incorporate the gene, or how deeply Waddington’s work<br />

relied on Bateson’s definition <strong>of</strong> genetics as the science that deals with the<br />

physiology <strong>of</strong> descent.<br />

Michael␣ T. Bravo University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />

Enlightened Precision in Geography and Anthropology<br />

Geography was lauded as the queen <strong>of</strong> enlightenment sciences in the mideighteenth<br />

century cartography was her sceptre. This paper explores the<br />

resonance between the values <strong>of</strong> precision implicit in cartography and<br />

anthropology. Historians <strong>of</strong> science have tended to assume that precision is<br />

intrinsic to cartography but only metaphorically imported into the human<br />

sciences. Is this assumption <strong>of</strong> cartography’s priority justified and if so, how<br />

is it peculiar to enlightened science? I will examine the rhetorical role <strong>of</strong><br />

precision in early nineteenth century anthropology <strong>of</strong> everyday life near home<br />

as well as far-flung places. The language <strong>of</strong> precision may tell us more about<br />

the perception <strong>of</strong> cartography than the maps themselves.<br />

56<br />

Emily␣ K. Brock Princeton University<br />

Gardeners and Botanists in the Study <strong>of</strong> Forests in England, 1650-1800<br />

In the late seventeenth century the growth and maintenance <strong>of</strong> forests to support<br />

England’s growing commercial and naval timber needs became a serious<br />

concern. A response soon came from the Royal <strong>Society</strong> in the form <strong>of</strong> John<br />

Evelyn’s Sylva, a book concerned with both the technicalities <strong>of</strong> planting trees<br />

and the encouragement <strong>of</strong> private landowners to plant. As the enthusiasm for<br />

planting trees and forests grew, the need for experts in the art <strong>of</strong> silviculture<br />

became apparent. Gardeners who concerned themselves with every aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

large estate gardens were the primary tree planters <strong>of</strong> this era, and in the years<br />

after the publication <strong>of</strong> Sylva their writings included ever more discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

trees and forests. In these gardeners’ books we see a shift towards mimicry <strong>of</strong><br />

the scientific writings <strong>of</strong> Evelyn, plant physiologist Stephen Hales, and other<br />

mainstream botanical writers. Among the most prominent gardening writers,<br />

their imitation <strong>of</strong> mainstream academic botanists was skillful enough to gain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!