2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
experimental data in the “Biochemistry and Morphogenesis” (1942), the<br />
successor to his 1931 three-volume work “Chemical Embryology” in which<br />
he had first introduced the new area <strong>of</strong> the chemical basis <strong>of</strong> ontogeny. The<br />
essential difference to Continental experimental embryology was, however,<br />
that the British School identified the inducing agent with a biochemical<br />
attractor, the so-called masked evocator. By contrasting these two different<br />
styles <strong>of</strong> scientific thought, the talk will address some further questions, e.g.,<br />
why Spemann did not incorporate the gene, or how deeply Waddington’s work<br />
relied on Bateson’s definition <strong>of</strong> genetics as the science that deals with the<br />
physiology <strong>of</strong> descent.<br />
Michael␣ T. Bravo University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />
Enlightened Precision in Geography and Anthropology<br />
Geography was lauded as the queen <strong>of</strong> enlightenment sciences in the mideighteenth<br />
century cartography was her sceptre. This paper explores the<br />
resonance between the values <strong>of</strong> precision implicit in cartography and<br />
anthropology. Historians <strong>of</strong> science have tended to assume that precision is<br />
intrinsic to cartography but only metaphorically imported into the human<br />
sciences. Is this assumption <strong>of</strong> cartography’s priority justified and if so, how<br />
is it peculiar to enlightened science? I will examine the rhetorical role <strong>of</strong><br />
precision in early nineteenth century anthropology <strong>of</strong> everyday life near home<br />
as well as far-flung places. The language <strong>of</strong> precision may tell us more about<br />
the perception <strong>of</strong> cartography than the maps themselves.<br />
56<br />
Emily␣ K. Brock Princeton University<br />
Gardeners and Botanists in the Study <strong>of</strong> Forests in England, 1650-1800<br />
In the late seventeenth century the growth and maintenance <strong>of</strong> forests to support<br />
England’s growing commercial and naval timber needs became a serious<br />
concern. A response soon came from the Royal <strong>Society</strong> in the form <strong>of</strong> John<br />
Evelyn’s Sylva, a book concerned with both the technicalities <strong>of</strong> planting trees<br />
and the encouragement <strong>of</strong> private landowners to plant. As the enthusiasm for<br />
planting trees and forests grew, the need for experts in the art <strong>of</strong> silviculture<br />
became apparent. Gardeners who concerned themselves with every aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
large estate gardens were the primary tree planters <strong>of</strong> this era, and in the years<br />
after the publication <strong>of</strong> Sylva their writings included ever more discussion <strong>of</strong><br />
trees and forests. In these gardeners’ books we see a shift towards mimicry <strong>of</strong><br />
the scientific writings <strong>of</strong> Evelyn, plant physiologist Stephen Hales, and other<br />
mainstream botanical writers. Among the most prominent gardening writers,<br />
their imitation <strong>of</strong> mainstream academic botanists was skillful enough to gain