14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PSA</strong> Abstracts<br />

critique is based on a misunderstanding <strong>of</strong> the criteria for the definability <strong>of</strong> a<br />

relation, a misunderstanding that Malement’s original treatment helped to foster.<br />

There are in fact a variety <strong>of</strong> notions <strong>of</strong> definability that can be brought to<br />

bear. They all, however, require a condition that suffices to secure Malament’s<br />

result. The non-standard relation Sarkar and Stachel claim to be definable is<br />

not so definable, and, I argue, their proposal to modify the notion <strong>of</strong> “causal<br />

definability” is misguided. Finally, I address the relevance <strong>of</strong> Malament’s result<br />

to the thesis <strong>of</strong> conventionalism.<br />

Eric␣ R. Scerri University <strong>of</strong> California Los Angeles<br />

The recently claimed observation <strong>of</strong> atomic orbitals and some related<br />

philosophical issues<br />

The main thrust <strong>of</strong> the paper concerns a theoretical and philosophical analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the claim made in September 1999 that atomic orbitals have been directly<br />

imaged for the first time. After a brief account <strong>of</strong> the recent claims the paper<br />

reviews the development <strong>of</strong> the orbit and later orbital concepts and analyzes<br />

the theoretical status <strong>of</strong> atomic orbitals. The conclusion is that contrary to<br />

these claims, atomic orbitals have not in fact been observed. The non referring<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> modern atomic orbitals is discussed in the context <strong>of</strong> Laudan’s writings<br />

on realism, the success <strong>of</strong> theories and whether or not scientific terms refer. I<br />

conclude that the failure to observe orbitals is a good prima facia case for<br />

divorcing the success <strong>of</strong> theories from the question <strong>of</strong> whether their central<br />

terms refer. The added relevance <strong>of</strong> this case is that it concerns a current and<br />

highly successful theory.<br />

P<br />

S<br />

A<br />

Oliver Schulte University <strong>of</strong> Alberta<br />

Inferring Conservation Principles in Particle Physics: A Case Study in<br />

Reliable and Efficient Inquiry<br />

This paper applies learning-theoretic analysis to an inductive problem that<br />

arises in particle physics: how to infer from observed reactions conservation<br />

principles that govern all reactions among elementary particles. I describe a<br />

reliable inference procedure that is guaranteed to arrive at an empirically<br />

adequate set <strong>of</strong> conservation principles as more and more evidence is gathered.<br />

In certain circumstances, finding an empirically adequate conservation theory<br />

requires positing hidden particles. The paper describes learning-theoretic<br />

conceptions <strong>of</strong> empirical success in addition to reliable convergence to a correct<br />

theory, which determine an essential unique optimal inductive procedure for<br />

the particle dynamics problem.<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!