2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>PSA</strong> Abstracts<br />
reasonable field, the standard energy conditions are violated classically. Thus<br />
the singularity theorems are unavailable for classical GR. Our understanding<br />
<strong>of</strong> singularities in GR turns on delicate issues <strong>of</strong> what it is to be a matter field<br />
issues distinct from the content <strong>of</strong> the theory.<br />
Patrick␣ J. McDonald University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame<br />
Demonstration by Simulation: The Centrality <strong>of</strong> Experiment for<br />
Helmholtz’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Perception<br />
Hermann von Helmholtz developed a comprehensive theory <strong>of</strong> perception.<br />
The paper argues that experiment is central to his theory, fulfilling three<br />
functions. One, arguments for the theory arise out <strong>of</strong> empirical research. Two,<br />
the idea <strong>of</strong> experiment spans a critical gap in the account <strong>of</strong> perception. Since<br />
the senses fail to reach the nature <strong>of</strong> actuality, experimentation and the discovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> law-like relationships are necessary to achieve empirical knowledge. Three,<br />
experimental practice elaborates the theory, revealing an arena indispensable<br />
to its understanding. To clarify, the essay focuses on Helmholtz’s analysis and<br />
synthesis <strong>of</strong> human vowels and explanation <strong>of</strong> tonal timbre.<br />
230<br />
Roberta␣ L. Millstein California State University, Hayward<br />
Is the Evolutionary Process Deterministic or Indeterministic? An Argument<br />
for Agnosticism<br />
Recently, philosophers <strong>of</strong> biology have debated the status <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary<br />
process: is it deterministic or indeterministic? I argue that there is insufficient<br />
reason to favor one side <strong>of</strong> the debate over the other, and that a more<br />
philosophically defensible position argues neither for the determinacy nor for<br />
the indeterminacy <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary process. In other words, I maintain that<br />
the appropriate stand to take towards the question <strong>of</strong> the determinism <strong>of</strong> the<br />
evolutionary process is agnosticism. I then suggest that an examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />
phenomenon <strong>of</strong> developmental noise might yield a solution to the problem.<br />
Samuel Mitchell Mount Holyoke College<br />
Confirming Theories One Claim at a Time<br />
The paper gives an example <strong>of</strong> a means <strong>of</strong> confirming scientific theories from<br />
a sequence <strong>of</strong> hypotheses, so that at any point every auxiliary used has already<br />
been confirmed. The data observed and the theoretical context determine which<br />
hypothesis is confirmed or refuted by each experiment. I argue that the process<br />
is not foundationalist. The objective is to demonstrate that under some real