14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PSA</strong> Abstracts<br />

reasonable field, the standard energy conditions are violated classically. Thus<br />

the singularity theorems are unavailable for classical GR. Our understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> singularities in GR turns on delicate issues <strong>of</strong> what it is to be a matter field<br />

issues distinct from the content <strong>of</strong> the theory.<br />

Patrick␣ J. McDonald University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame<br />

Demonstration by Simulation: The Centrality <strong>of</strong> Experiment for<br />

Helmholtz’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Perception<br />

Hermann von Helmholtz developed a comprehensive theory <strong>of</strong> perception.<br />

The paper argues that experiment is central to his theory, fulfilling three<br />

functions. One, arguments for the theory arise out <strong>of</strong> empirical research. Two,<br />

the idea <strong>of</strong> experiment spans a critical gap in the account <strong>of</strong> perception. Since<br />

the senses fail to reach the nature <strong>of</strong> actuality, experimentation and the discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> law-like relationships are necessary to achieve empirical knowledge. Three,<br />

experimental practice elaborates the theory, revealing an arena indispensable<br />

to its understanding. To clarify, the essay focuses on Helmholtz’s analysis and<br />

synthesis <strong>of</strong> human vowels and explanation <strong>of</strong> tonal timbre.<br />

230<br />

Roberta␣ L. Millstein California State University, Hayward<br />

Is the Evolutionary Process Deterministic or Indeterministic? An Argument<br />

for Agnosticism<br />

Recently, philosophers <strong>of</strong> biology have debated the status <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary<br />

process: is it deterministic or indeterministic? I argue that there is insufficient<br />

reason to favor one side <strong>of</strong> the debate over the other, and that a more<br />

philosophically defensible position argues neither for the determinacy nor for<br />

the indeterminacy <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary process. In other words, I maintain that<br />

the appropriate stand to take towards the question <strong>of</strong> the determinism <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolutionary process is agnosticism. I then suggest that an examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

phenomenon <strong>of</strong> developmental noise might yield a solution to the problem.<br />

Samuel Mitchell Mount Holyoke College<br />

Confirming Theories One Claim at a Time<br />

The paper gives an example <strong>of</strong> a means <strong>of</strong> confirming scientific theories from<br />

a sequence <strong>of</strong> hypotheses, so that at any point every auxiliary used has already<br />

been confirmed. The data observed and the theoretical context determine which<br />

hypothesis is confirmed or refuted by each experiment. I argue that the process<br />

is not foundationalist. The objective is to demonstrate that under some real

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!