2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>PSA</strong> Abstracts<br />
pair <strong>of</strong> spin-1/2 particles. There is not even an effective characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />
entangled states themselves, amongst the set <strong>of</strong> all mixed states. Philosophers<br />
<strong>of</strong> quantum theory, expert at making conceptual distinctions and certainly no<br />
strangers to the density operator formalism (cf. Gleason’s theorem and the<br />
‘ignorance interpretation <strong>of</strong> mixtures’), have almost entirely ignored these<br />
foundational problems. The present paper will survey the problems, discuss<br />
their connection to problems in quantum information theory, and draw out<br />
some <strong>of</strong> their implications for the voluminous philosophical literature on<br />
quantum nonlocality.<br />
Alberto Cordero Queens College & The Graduate Center<br />
Realism And Underdetermination: Some Clues from The Practices-Up<br />
Current theorizing about the nature <strong>of</strong> material systems effectively resolves<br />
into a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> absolutely incompatible statements about physical systems<br />
and their representation. Specifically, the most articulate recent attempts to<br />
turn Standard Quantum Theory (SQT) into a coherent system, though much<br />
better than previous <strong>of</strong>ferings, flounder in effective empirical<br />
underdetermination and mutual empirical equivalence, reviving old anti-realist<br />
fears about quantum physics. I discuss such fears and find them unsound<br />
nothing <strong>of</strong> global skeptical or agnostic significance really follows from the<br />
kind <strong>of</strong> underdetermination presently encountered in fundamental quantum<br />
theory. The case is instructive, however, for what it shows about the<br />
characteristics and prospects <strong>of</strong> scientific realism as a perspective in<br />
contemporary philosophy <strong>of</strong> science.<br />
P<br />
S<br />
A<br />
Kim Cuddington<br />
The “Balance <strong>of</strong> Nature” metaphor in population ecology:<br />
theory or paradigm?<br />
I claim that the balance <strong>of</strong> nature metaphor operates as a shorthand for a<br />
paradigm which view nature as a beneficent force. I trace the cultural origins<br />
<strong>of</strong> this concept and demonstrate that it operates today in the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />
population ecology. Although it might be suspected that this metaphor operated<br />
a pre-theoretic description <strong>of</strong> the more precisely defined notion <strong>of</strong> equilibrium,<br />
I demonstrate that the balance concept has been used to define those types <strong>of</strong><br />
equilibrium which are deemed natural. This interaction suggests that the<br />
metaphor is much more than a precursor <strong>of</strong> the theoretical concept <strong>of</strong> population<br />
equilibrium.<br />
211