14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PSA</strong> Abstracts<br />

pair <strong>of</strong> spin-1/2 particles. There is not even an effective characterization <strong>of</strong> the<br />

entangled states themselves, amongst the set <strong>of</strong> all mixed states. Philosophers<br />

<strong>of</strong> quantum theory, expert at making conceptual distinctions and certainly no<br />

strangers to the density operator formalism (cf. Gleason’s theorem and the<br />

‘ignorance interpretation <strong>of</strong> mixtures’), have almost entirely ignored these<br />

foundational problems. The present paper will survey the problems, discuss<br />

their connection to problems in quantum information theory, and draw out<br />

some <strong>of</strong> their implications for the voluminous philosophical literature on<br />

quantum nonlocality.<br />

Alberto Cordero Queens College & The Graduate Center<br />

Realism And Underdetermination: Some Clues from The Practices-Up<br />

Current theorizing about the nature <strong>of</strong> material systems effectively resolves<br />

into a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> absolutely incompatible statements about physical systems<br />

and their representation. Specifically, the most articulate recent attempts to<br />

turn Standard Quantum Theory (SQT) into a coherent system, though much<br />

better than previous <strong>of</strong>ferings, flounder in effective empirical<br />

underdetermination and mutual empirical equivalence, reviving old anti-realist<br />

fears about quantum physics. I discuss such fears and find them unsound<br />

nothing <strong>of</strong> global skeptical or agnostic significance really follows from the<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> underdetermination presently encountered in fundamental quantum<br />

theory. The case is instructive, however, for what it shows about the<br />

characteristics and prospects <strong>of</strong> scientific realism as a perspective in<br />

contemporary philosophy <strong>of</strong> science.<br />

P<br />

S<br />

A<br />

Kim Cuddington<br />

The “Balance <strong>of</strong> Nature” metaphor in population ecology:<br />

theory or paradigm?<br />

I claim that the balance <strong>of</strong> nature metaphor operates as a shorthand for a<br />

paradigm which view nature as a beneficent force. I trace the cultural origins<br />

<strong>of</strong> this concept and demonstrate that it operates today in the discipline <strong>of</strong><br />

population ecology. Although it might be suspected that this metaphor operated<br />

a pre-theoretic description <strong>of</strong> the more precisely defined notion <strong>of</strong> equilibrium,<br />

I demonstrate that the balance concept has been used to define those types <strong>of</strong><br />

equilibrium which are deemed natural. This interaction suggests that the<br />

metaphor is much more than a precursor <strong>of</strong> the theoretical concept <strong>of</strong> population<br />

equilibrium.<br />

211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!