14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

medical discussion in the late Enlightenment and 3) the “gendering” <strong>of</strong> hysteria<br />

in works produced in the 1780s, especially Beauchêne’s De l’influence des<br />

affections de l’âme dans les maladies nerveuses des femmes. The paper will<br />

stress the complexity <strong>of</strong> the discourse <strong>of</strong> hysteria in Enlightenment France<br />

while arguing that the late eighteenth century witnessed a general trend away<br />

from somatic explanation and toward holistic, psychosomatic explanations<br />

that depended heavily on emergent conceptions <strong>of</strong> strictly delimited gender<br />

roles. Thus it will be argued that the gendering <strong>of</strong> hysteria in the late<br />

Enlightenment emerged from a larger physiological and medical discourse<br />

that purportedly grounded pathological categories in a new understanding <strong>of</strong><br />

the physico-moral constitution <strong>of</strong> the sexes.<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Jack Wilson Washington & Lee University<br />

U.S Patents on Organisms Prior to Diamond v. Chakrabarty<br />

This paper explores the history <strong>of</strong> the interaction between intellectual property<br />

law and biology in the United States prior to the Chakrabarty decision. As is well<br />

known, in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that patent statutes should be<br />

interpreted so as to include living bacteria within the scope <strong>of</strong> patent law. Contrary<br />

to popular opinion, however, the Chakrabarty case did not represent the first time<br />

that patent protection had been extended to an economically important living<br />

organism had been patented. Numerous process and product patents had previously<br />

been issued for bacteria, viruses, and vaccines. Some higher plants had been<br />

protected from unauthorized asexual reproduction through the Plant Patent Act <strong>of</strong><br />

1930. The scientific and political factors involved in these patents make an<br />

interesting story in their own right and also foreshadow the current debates about<br />

intellectual property rights covering genetically modified organisms and genes.<br />

Alison Winter California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Snails, Leeches, Mediums, and Conductors:<br />

The Use <strong>of</strong> Living Things as Instruments in Mid-Nineteenth Century<br />

Europe<br />

The mid nineteenth century saw the proliferation <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> very different<br />

experimental inventions that, despite their differences, shared one striking<br />

characteristic: the physiology <strong>of</strong> a living animal was joined to the working <strong>of</strong> a<br />

mechanical device to create a composite instrumental system. Four examples,<br />

falling within a single decade, are the so-called ‘snail telegraph’, in which snails<br />

were claimed to be able to transmit information between Paris and New York the<br />

‘tempest prognosticator,’ which relied on the responses <strong>of</strong> leeches to an impending<br />

storm the fashionable practices <strong>of</strong> ‘table turning’ (the immediate precursor <strong>of</strong><br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!