2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
medical discussion in the late Enlightenment and 3) the “gendering” <strong>of</strong> hysteria<br />
in works produced in the 1780s, especially Beauchêne’s De l’influence des<br />
affections de l’âme dans les maladies nerveuses des femmes. The paper will<br />
stress the complexity <strong>of</strong> the discourse <strong>of</strong> hysteria in Enlightenment France<br />
while arguing that the late eighteenth century witnessed a general trend away<br />
from somatic explanation and toward holistic, psychosomatic explanations<br />
that depended heavily on emergent conceptions <strong>of</strong> strictly delimited gender<br />
roles. Thus it will be argued that the gendering <strong>of</strong> hysteria in the late<br />
Enlightenment emerged from a larger physiological and medical discourse<br />
that purportedly grounded pathological categories in a new understanding <strong>of</strong><br />
the physico-moral constitution <strong>of</strong> the sexes.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Jack Wilson Washington & Lee University<br />
U.S Patents on Organisms Prior to Diamond v. Chakrabarty<br />
This paper explores the history <strong>of</strong> the interaction between intellectual property<br />
law and biology in the United States prior to the Chakrabarty decision. As is well<br />
known, in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that patent statutes should be<br />
interpreted so as to include living bacteria within the scope <strong>of</strong> patent law. Contrary<br />
to popular opinion, however, the Chakrabarty case did not represent the first time<br />
that patent protection had been extended to an economically important living<br />
organism had been patented. Numerous process and product patents had previously<br />
been issued for bacteria, viruses, and vaccines. Some higher plants had been<br />
protected from unauthorized asexual reproduction through the Plant Patent Act <strong>of</strong><br />
1930. The scientific and political factors involved in these patents make an<br />
interesting story in their own right and also foreshadow the current debates about<br />
intellectual property rights covering genetically modified organisms and genes.<br />
Alison Winter California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />
Snails, Leeches, Mediums, and Conductors:<br />
The Use <strong>of</strong> Living Things as Instruments in Mid-Nineteenth Century<br />
Europe<br />
The mid nineteenth century saw the proliferation <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> very different<br />
experimental inventions that, despite their differences, shared one striking<br />
characteristic: the physiology <strong>of</strong> a living animal was joined to the working <strong>of</strong> a<br />
mechanical device to create a composite instrumental system. Four examples,<br />
falling within a single decade, are the so-called ‘snail telegraph’, in which snails<br />
were claimed to be able to transmit information between Paris and New York the<br />
‘tempest prognosticator,’ which relied on the responses <strong>of</strong> leeches to an impending<br />
storm the fashionable practices <strong>of</strong> ‘table turning’ (the immediate precursor <strong>of</strong><br />
181