2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Petra Werner Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften<br />
Composing the Picture <strong>of</strong> Nature,<br />
or Alexander von Humboldt’s English Correspondents<br />
In this presentation, I will describe the extent to which Alexander von<br />
Humboldt’s English correspondents helped him construct the picture <strong>of</strong> nature<br />
found in his book “Cosmos, a Sketch <strong>of</strong> a Physical Description <strong>of</strong> the World.”<br />
I will base my evaluation on the correspondence he carried on with English<br />
naturalists. (Many <strong>of</strong> these letters remain unpublished.) Humboldt himself<br />
depended on these letters from English colleagues, citing them <strong>of</strong>ten, for the<br />
composition <strong>of</strong> that five-volume work <strong>of</strong> his later years. He carried on a<br />
correspondence with a total <strong>of</strong> 109 English scientists and writers (a list will be<br />
presented), <strong>of</strong> which some 38 are mentioned in “Cosmos”—along with citations<br />
<strong>of</strong> their work and letters. The extent <strong>of</strong> the correspondence with a given<br />
individual does not always indicate its significance for either <strong>of</strong> the writers: a<br />
rather detailed correspondence exists with Herschel, but only a few letters<br />
passed between Humboldt and Darwin. Yet Darwin was an important<br />
correspondent for Humboldt. The contact made with most <strong>of</strong> Humboldt’s<br />
English colleagues had not only a scientific component, but a social one as<br />
well—indeed, both aspects <strong>of</strong> the relationship overlapped. This relationship<br />
became particularly important for Humboldt when he was attacked in some<br />
reviews by prominent English writers—he expected support from his friends.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Simon␣ R.␣ E. Werrett Max Planck Institute for the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />
An Odd Sort <strong>of</strong> Exhibition:<br />
Spectacles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and the Russian State in the Eighteenth Century<br />
In 1675 a young Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz wrote a memorandum describing<br />
“An Odd Thought concerning a New Sort <strong>of</strong> Exhibition.” One <strong>of</strong> Leibniz’s first<br />
designs for an Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, the “Exhibition” he described was a<br />
distinctly dramaturgical, spectacular form <strong>of</strong> operation, hybridizing Francis<br />
Bacon’s Solomon’s House with the theatricals <strong>of</strong> German carnival. This paper<br />
follows the Leibnizian exhibition into reality as it traces the role <strong>of</strong> spectacle in<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> the St. Petersburg Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s in early eighteenthcentury<br />
Russia. The place <strong>of</strong> spectacle in the history <strong>of</strong> the sciences in Russia<br />
has been neglected in the past, but for the first fifty years <strong>of</strong> its existence,<br />
academicians produced spectacular theatricals such as allegorical fireworks<br />
displays and museological shows which served to bind the Academy to the<br />
Russian court and government . I explore how these spectacles promoted<br />
academic and courtly concerns by focusing on celebrations surrounding an “Ice<br />
Palace” built in St. Petersburg in the winter <strong>of</strong> 1740. A fine example <strong>of</strong> Leibnizian<br />
theatre, the Ice Palace mobilized artefacts and skills drawn from the Academy’s<br />
179