14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Conevery␣ Bolton Valencius Washington University<br />

Inside, Outside, Valley, Field:<br />

Miasmas and Healthy Places in the Antebellum U.S.<br />

Newcomers to the pre-Civil War Mississippi Valley experienced a range <strong>of</strong><br />

places as ‘healthy’ or ‘unhealthy,’ ‘sickly’ or ‘salubrious.’ This paper explores<br />

the variety <strong>of</strong> sites that antebellum Americans (and new immigrants)<br />

experienced as possessing ‘health.’ Miasmas, I will argue, implicated indoor<br />

spaces as well as external environments in the healthfulness <strong>of</strong> a place: the<br />

boundary between ‘wild’ and natural environments and bounded, domestic<br />

ones was porous and <strong>of</strong>ten permeated. Many different ranges <strong>of</strong> space,<br />

moreover, could possess ‘health’: both ‘the Mississippi valley’ and a nearby<br />

riverbottom could be meaningfully spoken <strong>of</strong> as being ‘healthy’ or ‘miasmatic.’<br />

‘Health’ was thus a concept that carried both great specificity and great range:<br />

every environment, in the logic <strong>of</strong> the early and middle nineteenth century,<br />

possessed influences that wrote themselves into and onto the human form. No<br />

place through which human beings moved was neutral territory.<br />

172<br />

Ellen␣ J. Valle University <strong>of</strong> Turku, Finland<br />

From Sloane to Owen:<br />

Epistolary Episodes in the Construction <strong>of</strong> Natural <strong>History</strong><br />

The epistolary genre was central to the working <strong>of</strong> the scientific discourse<br />

community and the development <strong>of</strong> scientific discourse throughout the 17th<br />

and 18th century. New information and ideas <strong>of</strong>ten circulated within groups<br />

linked together by correspondence these groups varied considerably in size<br />

and in their degree <strong>of</strong> compactness vs. diffuseness. The face-to-face discourse<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Royal <strong>Society</strong> at the weekly meetings was <strong>of</strong>ten based on letters<br />

received or written. Ultimately, these letters might end up published, in the<br />

Philosophical Transactions or elsewhere. Letters were particularly important<br />

in natural history, since this field <strong>of</strong> study encompassed areas geographically<br />

remote from the center. Letters from the periphery to the center might be<br />

used to convey information about new observations and requests for books<br />

and supplies to accompany a specimen being sent to London or to submit an<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial report to the authorities (the Admiralty, for instance). Traveling in<br />

the opposite direction, letters could send directions for exploration or request<br />

particular specimens (a plant for a patron’s garden or a particular fossil bone).<br />

In the 19th century, the epistolary genre is usually considered to be less<br />

important. In natural history and the life sciences more generally, however,<br />

it continued to play a role Darwin’s use <strong>of</strong> letters, to elicit information about<br />

variation both from pr<strong>of</strong>essional biologists and from amateurs and ‘fanciers’,<br />

is well known. Likewise Richard Owen embeds letters in his published work

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!