14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

ambivalence characterized each aspect <strong>of</strong> the triangular relationship between<br />

Protestant missionaries, Western science, and their host cultures. The<br />

missionary movement, while containing those eager to cultivate sciences such<br />

as geography and medicine to facilitate evangelism, also contained pietists<br />

who warned more scientifically-oriented colleagues against anything except<br />

direct evangelism. Missionary suspicion <strong>of</strong> ‘godless’ Western science<br />

burgeoned in the post-Darwinian era, as apostles <strong>of</strong> T.H. Huxley spread the<br />

gospel <strong>of</strong> scientific naturalism. Ambivalence also characterized host cultures’<br />

reception <strong>of</strong> missionary science. Many simply ignored or rejected the<br />

missionaries and all their works. Yet even in the toughest mission fields such<br />

as China and India, modernizing élites intent on strengthening their nation<br />

embraced missionary science, and plenty <strong>of</strong> ordinary people found healing in<br />

missionary medicine. Despite the ambivalence they encountered from<br />

missionary colleagues and many <strong>of</strong> their hosts, Protestant missionaries played<br />

a significant role in the globalization <strong>of</strong> Western science.<br />

James␣ E. Strick Arizona State University<br />

Cell Symbiosis Theory from Mereschkovsky to Exobiology<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> endosymbiosis as the origin <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic cells and/or their<br />

organelles began around 1905 with theories <strong>of</strong> the Russian biologist<br />

Mereschovsky. As Sapp, Khakhina and others have shown, numerous additional<br />

contrib-utors, e.g. Paul Portier and Ivan Wallin, added observa-tions to support<br />

this theory throughout the twentieth century. The concept ill fit existing cell<br />

theory, however, until the establishment <strong>of</strong> the prokaryote/ eukaryote distinction<br />

in the 1960s and the work <strong>of</strong> Lynn Margulis begin-ning in 1967. This<br />

paper will bring up to date the status <strong>of</strong> endosymbiosis theory since Sapp’s<br />

1994 account, focusing on the claims that are still not widely accepted such as<br />

the spirochete origin <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic “flagella” (“undulipodia” <strong>of</strong> the Margulis<br />

school), origin <strong>of</strong> centrioles and mitotic spindle apparatus, and origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

eukaryotic nucleus from fusion <strong>of</strong> multiple eubacterial and archaeal DNA units.<br />

More importantly, I will show how integral endosymbiosis theory has become<br />

to the entire new discipline <strong>of</strong> exobiology and how cell theory has changed in<br />

fundamental ways since the 1960s, under the influence <strong>of</strong> exobiology generally<br />

and cell symbiosis theory in particular.<br />

164<br />

Alice Stroup Bard College<br />

Duclos on Boyle:<br />

A French Academician Criticizes ‘Certain Physiological Essays’<br />

The two principal scientific societies <strong>of</strong> the late 17th century counted alchemists

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!