2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
ambivalence characterized each aspect <strong>of</strong> the triangular relationship between<br />
Protestant missionaries, Western science, and their host cultures. The<br />
missionary movement, while containing those eager to cultivate sciences such<br />
as geography and medicine to facilitate evangelism, also contained pietists<br />
who warned more scientifically-oriented colleagues against anything except<br />
direct evangelism. Missionary suspicion <strong>of</strong> ‘godless’ Western science<br />
burgeoned in the post-Darwinian era, as apostles <strong>of</strong> T.H. Huxley spread the<br />
gospel <strong>of</strong> scientific naturalism. Ambivalence also characterized host cultures’<br />
reception <strong>of</strong> missionary science. Many simply ignored or rejected the<br />
missionaries and all their works. Yet even in the toughest mission fields such<br />
as China and India, modernizing élites intent on strengthening their nation<br />
embraced missionary science, and plenty <strong>of</strong> ordinary people found healing in<br />
missionary medicine. Despite the ambivalence they encountered from<br />
missionary colleagues and many <strong>of</strong> their hosts, Protestant missionaries played<br />
a significant role in the globalization <strong>of</strong> Western science.<br />
James␣ E. Strick Arizona State University<br />
Cell Symbiosis Theory from Mereschkovsky to Exobiology<br />
The concept <strong>of</strong> endosymbiosis as the origin <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic cells and/or their<br />
organelles began around 1905 with theories <strong>of</strong> the Russian biologist<br />
Mereschovsky. As Sapp, Khakhina and others have shown, numerous additional<br />
contrib-utors, e.g. Paul Portier and Ivan Wallin, added observa-tions to support<br />
this theory throughout the twentieth century. The concept ill fit existing cell<br />
theory, however, until the establishment <strong>of</strong> the prokaryote/ eukaryote distinction<br />
in the 1960s and the work <strong>of</strong> Lynn Margulis begin-ning in 1967. This<br />
paper will bring up to date the status <strong>of</strong> endosymbiosis theory since Sapp’s<br />
1994 account, focusing on the claims that are still not widely accepted such as<br />
the spirochete origin <strong>of</strong> eukaryotic “flagella” (“undulipodia” <strong>of</strong> the Margulis<br />
school), origin <strong>of</strong> centrioles and mitotic spindle apparatus, and origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />
eukaryotic nucleus from fusion <strong>of</strong> multiple eubacterial and archaeal DNA units.<br />
More importantly, I will show how integral endosymbiosis theory has become<br />
to the entire new discipline <strong>of</strong> exobiology and how cell theory has changed in<br />
fundamental ways since the 1960s, under the influence <strong>of</strong> exobiology generally<br />
and cell symbiosis theory in particular.<br />
164<br />
Alice Stroup Bard College<br />
Duclos on Boyle:<br />
A French Academician Criticizes ‘Certain Physiological Essays’<br />
The two principal scientific societies <strong>of</strong> the late 17th century counted alchemists