14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

sought to define bacteria as biological entities and to specify their place in the<br />

natural order. By 1961, defining bacteria in biological terms had acquired a<br />

new urgency. A widening group <strong>of</strong> researchers were using bacteria to investigate<br />

fundamental biological problems, including protein synthesis, the replication<br />

<strong>of</strong> DNA, and the nature <strong>of</strong> the genetic code. For practitioners interested<br />

primarily in molecules, legitimizing bacteria as biological organisms<br />

legitimized their tool <strong>of</strong> investigation. In 1962, Stanier and van Niel proposed<br />

the terms procaryote and eucaryote to refer to two fundamentally distinct cell<br />

types, based on the details <strong>of</strong> their plan <strong>of</strong> organization. Conceiving <strong>of</strong> bacteria<br />

as procaryotes gave these once marginalized organisms a clear and important<br />

position in the order <strong>of</strong> nature. The procaryote/eucaryote distinction ended the<br />

conventional belief that plants and animals represented the fundamental<br />

bifurcation among living things. The new term also signified the dual nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the bacterium as organism and as technology. From the 1960’s through the<br />

1980’s, the procaryote/eucaryote distinction served as the generally accepted<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the cell theory.<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Matthew Stanley Harvard University<br />

<strong>Science</strong> and the Spiritual Quest:<br />

Religion, Epistemology, and Eddington’s Stellar Models<br />

Arthur Eddington, the British astronomer best known for his stellar models and<br />

the 1919 eclipse expedition to confirm general relativity, developed a philosophy<br />

<strong>of</strong> science closely related to his Quaker faith. This faith stressed the rejection <strong>of</strong><br />

a need for dogmatic certainty in favor <strong>of</strong> a spirit <strong>of</strong> continual seeking for spiritual<br />

truth. His religious beliefs provided conceptual resources for constructing a view<br />

<strong>of</strong> science as an open-ended enterprise in which theories were not valued for<br />

their certainty or finality, but rather by their ability to allow further scientific<br />

investigation. This paper argues that this philosophy was fundamental for the<br />

creation and use <strong>of</strong> Eddington’s models <strong>of</strong> stellar structure.<br />

John Stenhouse University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />

Protestant Missionaries and Modern Western <strong>Science</strong> 1790-1930<br />

Historians <strong>of</strong> science have only recently begun investigating the relationship<br />

between the modern Protestant missionary movement and modern Western<br />

science. This paper argues that missionaries played a modest role in the<br />

production <strong>of</strong> modern Western scientific knowledge, particularly in natural<br />

history, ethnography, and the biomedical sciences, and a more significant one<br />

in helping disseminate Western science to the world, particularly during the<br />

heyday <strong>of</strong> missionary science between about 1870 and 1930. Complexity and<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!