2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
sought to define bacteria as biological entities and to specify their place in the<br />
natural order. By 1961, defining bacteria in biological terms had acquired a<br />
new urgency. A widening group <strong>of</strong> researchers were using bacteria to investigate<br />
fundamental biological problems, including protein synthesis, the replication<br />
<strong>of</strong> DNA, and the nature <strong>of</strong> the genetic code. For practitioners interested<br />
primarily in molecules, legitimizing bacteria as biological organisms<br />
legitimized their tool <strong>of</strong> investigation. In 1962, Stanier and van Niel proposed<br />
the terms procaryote and eucaryote to refer to two fundamentally distinct cell<br />
types, based on the details <strong>of</strong> their plan <strong>of</strong> organization. Conceiving <strong>of</strong> bacteria<br />
as procaryotes gave these once marginalized organisms a clear and important<br />
position in the order <strong>of</strong> nature. The procaryote/eucaryote distinction ended the<br />
conventional belief that plants and animals represented the fundamental<br />
bifurcation among living things. The new term also signified the dual nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the bacterium as organism and as technology. From the 1960’s through the<br />
1980’s, the procaryote/eucaryote distinction served as the generally accepted<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the cell theory.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Matthew Stanley Harvard University<br />
<strong>Science</strong> and the Spiritual Quest:<br />
Religion, Epistemology, and Eddington’s Stellar Models<br />
Arthur Eddington, the British astronomer best known for his stellar models and<br />
the 1919 eclipse expedition to confirm general relativity, developed a philosophy<br />
<strong>of</strong> science closely related to his Quaker faith. This faith stressed the rejection <strong>of</strong><br />
a need for dogmatic certainty in favor <strong>of</strong> a spirit <strong>of</strong> continual seeking for spiritual<br />
truth. His religious beliefs provided conceptual resources for constructing a view<br />
<strong>of</strong> science as an open-ended enterprise in which theories were not valued for<br />
their certainty or finality, but rather by their ability to allow further scientific<br />
investigation. This paper argues that this philosophy was fundamental for the<br />
creation and use <strong>of</strong> Eddington’s models <strong>of</strong> stellar structure.<br />
John Stenhouse University <strong>of</strong> Otago<br />
Protestant Missionaries and Modern Western <strong>Science</strong> 1790-1930<br />
Historians <strong>of</strong> science have only recently begun investigating the relationship<br />
between the modern Protestant missionary movement and modern Western<br />
science. This paper argues that missionaries played a modest role in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> modern Western scientific knowledge, particularly in natural<br />
history, ethnography, and the biomedical sciences, and a more significant one<br />
in helping disseminate Western science to the world, particularly during the<br />
heyday <strong>of</strong> missionary science between about 1870 and 1930. Complexity and<br />
163