2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
<strong>of</strong> World War Two, set out to demonstrate that it too still had the scientific, technical,<br />
and human capacity to be taken seriously on the world stage. To succeed, I shall<br />
argue, Britain chose a novel and explicitly post-imperial mode, constructed around<br />
the British Commonwealth, to mount complicated, meticulously planned,<br />
multinational expeditions to Everest and the Antarctic. In the attempt on Everest,<br />
the expedition leader, former army <strong>of</strong>ficer John Hunt, considered climbers from<br />
Britain, Kenya, Canada, New Zealand, India, and Nepal, while explicitly rejecting<br />
those from Europe or the United States. In London, he chose an experienced New<br />
Zealand climber, Edmund Hillary, and when in Nepal, he chose the locally eminent<br />
Sherpa Tenzing Norgay to join the party. The expedition, after much effort, placed<br />
three pairs <strong>of</strong> men at the South Col <strong>of</strong> the mountain after the first pair failed in<br />
their final assault, Hunt ordered Hillary and Tenzing to try. Upon their successful<br />
final ascent, these two members <strong>of</strong> the British Commonwealth stood at the top <strong>of</strong><br />
a supply pyramid that had been constructed in London and flung across Asia.<br />
Neither Hillary nor Hunt had expected the worldwide adulation that was to follow<br />
both constantly emphasized the importance <strong>of</strong> the entire team. None the less,<br />
Hillary used his fame and the geographical proximity <strong>of</strong> his nation to the South<br />
Pole to take a more central role in the trans-Antarctic expedition <strong>of</strong> 1957 and 1958<br />
which was organized by the British geologist Vivian Fuchs as one <strong>of</strong> the British<br />
Commonwealth’s contributions to the International Geophysical Year (IGY).<br />
Careful planning, appropriate mechanization, and contributions <strong>of</strong> funds, personnel,<br />
and expertise from Australia, South Africa and New Zealand led to a successful<br />
crossing <strong>of</strong> the continent. Compared to the Soviet or US explorations <strong>of</strong> space, the<br />
Everest and Antarctic expeditions were on a very much smaller scale. Forced by<br />
reduced circumstances to operate more modestly, they still managed to complete<br />
their missions successfully and to generate worldwide acclaim. Britain, by operating<br />
in a new post-imperial mode that relied upon cooperation between like-minded<br />
nations, was able to demonstrate that it too had the right stuff in some very cold<br />
and hostile places.<br />
162<br />
Susan␣ B. Spath Independent Scholar<br />
A New Cell Theory in 1962: The Procaryote/Eucaryote Distinction<br />
The cell theory introduced in the middle <strong>of</strong> the 19th century provided a<br />
fundamental conceptual lens for perceiving and studying living things. This<br />
paper argues that procaryote/eucaryote distinction introduced by<br />
microbiologists R. Y. Stanier and C. B. van Niel in 1962 represents a<br />
reformation <strong>of</strong> the cell theory made necessary and possible by and for the new<br />
biologies <strong>of</strong> the post World War II era. Disciplinary politics, new knowledge<br />
about the biology <strong>of</strong> bacteria, and new laboratory practices interacted in<br />
encouraging this reformulation. Stanier and van Niel introduced these<br />
categories to solve a conceptual problem central to their ambitions to make<br />
microbiology into a coherent and rigorous science. From the 1940’s on, they