14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

influenced national consciousness, state policy, and drew a link between notions<br />

and present and ancient Chinese heritage through the natural geography.<br />

Buhm Soon Park National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health<br />

More Academic Than a University:<br />

Three Freedoms and the Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology at NIH, 1961-<br />

1981<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

This essay examines the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology<br />

as an intramural program <strong>of</strong> the National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health during the first two<br />

decades <strong>of</strong> its operation (1961-1981). My main focus is on the structure and function<br />

<strong>of</strong> this laboratory in the particular institutional setting provided by the federal<br />

government, which emerged as a leading patron for biomedical research after<br />

World War II. NIH intramural programs in Bethesda had a clearly defined mission—<br />

”better health through research”—in common, but a broad interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

relevance to categorical diseases allowed various kinds <strong>of</strong> research activities in<br />

many scientific and medical disciplines. In this complex environment <strong>of</strong> a<br />

government agency, researchers inevitably encountered statutory and administrative<br />

restraints on the one hand, and pressures for more responsive programs on the<br />

other. Yet the disadvantages could be <strong>of</strong>fset by “three freedoms” uniquely available<br />

on the NIH campus: freedom to choose research topics without being restricted to<br />

the subject <strong>of</strong> the grant proposal, freedom to devote almost all working hours to<br />

research, and freedom from the need to develop “grantsmanship” skills. These<br />

freedoms, the essay shows, ensured the autonomy <strong>of</strong> individual researchers in the<br />

Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Molecular Biology, and fostered a scientific community that<br />

encouraged a generous exchange <strong>of</strong> ideas, a facile initiation <strong>of</strong> collaboration, and<br />

a flexible planning <strong>of</strong> research. The quality <strong>of</strong> their research products, in return,<br />

helped to convince NIH administrators and outside reviewers <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> three<br />

freedoms in fulfilling the mission.<br />

Richard␣ J. Sorrenson Indiana University<br />

From the South Col to South Pole:<br />

Sir Edmund Hillary and the British Commonwealth Expeditions<br />

to Everest and Antarctica in the 1950s<br />

Within less than a decade in the middle <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, ambitious nations<br />

demonstrated their Cold War vigor by hand picking men to do dangerous things<br />

that had not been done before, had no direct economic utility, but were strangely<br />

compelling: climbing Mt. Everest, crossing Antarctica, and orbiting the earth.<br />

Only the two postwar superpowers (the USSR and the USA) could afford the<br />

latter, but Britain, much reduced in influence and wealth after the brutal struggle<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!