14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Dorothy Ross Johns Hopkins University<br />

The Social <strong>Science</strong> Disciplines in Europe and the U.S.:<br />

Enlarging the Historical Lens<br />

This paper attempts a critical overview <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> the disciplines<br />

that are variously denominated “human,” “social,” and “behavioral” sciences,<br />

from their formation in the late nineteenth century to the present in Europe<br />

and the United States. I will focus on a number <strong>of</strong> key issues in that history<br />

and its historiography: the notion <strong>of</strong> social science disciplinary formation as a<br />

“project” the disputed location <strong>of</strong> the social sciences between science and the<br />

humanities the interplay <strong>of</strong> national and cross-national influences the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the social sciences as engineering sciences, particularly in the<br />

U.S. the postwar, international renewal <strong>of</strong> the social science disciplinary project<br />

and its threatened disintegration since 1970.<br />

Michael Ruse University <strong>of</strong> Guelph<br />

Was neo-Darwinism Darwinian?<br />

The most influential idea in twentieth century American evolutionary biology<br />

was Sewall Wright’s metaphor <strong>of</strong> an adaptive landscape. I argue that, apart from<br />

being completely confused conceptually and having absolutely no basis in<br />

empirical reality, this was a deeply non-Darwinian notion that appealed because<br />

it could be used by those (the vast majority <strong>of</strong> evolutionists) who had no<br />

mathematical ability. The metaphor’s roots lie in the work <strong>of</strong> Herbert Spencer,<br />

which is no surprise for Spencer always had (and in many respects still has) far<br />

more influence on American thought than anything penned by Charles Darwin.<br />

150<br />

Steven␣ W. Ruskin University <strong>of</strong> Notre Dame<br />

Private <strong>Science</strong> , Public Imagination, and the Ambitions <strong>of</strong> Empire:<br />

Perceptions <strong>of</strong> John Herschel’s Cape Voyage, 1833-1838<br />

John Herschel’s voyage to the Cape Colony (1833-38) was an event <strong>of</strong> considerable<br />

interest for Britain. John sailed to the southern tip <strong>of</strong> Africa to observe the southern<br />

heavens. His intention was that the voyage be a “private affair . . . a mere party <strong>of</strong><br />

pleasure.” But his scientific renown encouraged the public imagination to place<br />

his journey in the same category as other imperial expeditions: for example, that<br />

undertaken by Captain James Cook and Joseph Banks, and those in Africa <strong>of</strong><br />

Mungo Park and Richard Lander. Herschel, however, did not see his voyage in<br />

this way he rejected government aid and any <strong>of</strong>ficial status. Yet the image <strong>of</strong><br />

Herschel as an imperial scientist-explorer remained and his voyage was popularly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!