2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Marsha␣ L. Richmond Wayne State University<br />
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Cell Theory on the Eve <strong>of</strong> Genetics<br />
A cardinal event in the early history <strong>of</strong> genetics was the recognition circa<br />
1904 that the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the chromosomes during the process <strong>of</strong> replication<br />
closely paralleled that expected <strong>of</strong> Mendelizing factors. Thus was founded the<br />
new subdiscipline <strong>of</strong> cytogenetics, which mutually enriched classical genetics<br />
and cytology. Yet for decades many biologists had accepted the idea that the<br />
nucleus was the seat <strong>of</strong> heredity and development. Indeed, by 1900 Richard<br />
Hertwig and his school at Munich were experimentally investigating the nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> this control. In addition to Theodor Boveri and Richard Goldschmidt, the<br />
young British zoologists Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Watkins Smith <strong>of</strong> Oxford and C. Clifford<br />
Dobell <strong>of</strong> Cambridge went to Munich to study with Hertwig. Yet while Smith<br />
accepted the nucleocentric model <strong>of</strong> the cell, Dobell subsequently became a<br />
vocal critic. This paper will assess the status <strong>of</strong> cell theory on the eve <strong>of</strong> genetics<br />
by comparing and contrasting the views <strong>of</strong> Goldschmidt, Dobell, and Smith.<br />
It explores the extent to which an individual’s view <strong>of</strong> the organization <strong>of</strong> life<br />
influences their understanding <strong>of</strong> “cellular reality.”<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Michael␣ F. Robinson University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison<br />
Chicago’s Eskimo Village:<br />
Reconsidering Race at the World’s Columbian Exposition, 1893<br />
In 1893, over two dozen Innu villagers from Labrador settled into their new<br />
home on the grounds <strong>of</strong> the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. They<br />
took their place among a variety <strong>of</strong> transplanted “savage” and “semi-barbarous”<br />
peoples who constituted the anthropology exhibits <strong>of</strong> the fair. Organizers set<br />
the Eskimo Village on the main Exposition grounds, apart from other ethnic<br />
villages on the Midway, and at a distance from the “White City,” the fair’s<br />
shrine to Anglo-Saxon progress. In so doing, they used the fairgrounds to<br />
represent a theory <strong>of</strong> cultural evolution still widespread within the<br />
anthropological community. Within this theory, the Eskimo Village symbolized<br />
human culture at its most primitive and <strong>of</strong>fered white Americans a glimpse <strong>of</strong><br />
their own prehistoric past. Recent studies have made use <strong>of</strong> the racial symbolism<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Columbian Exposition in interpreting pr<strong>of</strong>essional and popular discourse<br />
about race in late nineteenth century America. Yet few studies have looked<br />
beyond the planning and production <strong>of</strong> the fair’s exhibitions to the agency <strong>of</strong><br />
native participants themselves. This paper examines the actions <strong>of</strong> the Innu<br />
within the Eskimo Village and their effect upon popular discourse. It argues<br />
that the Innu frequently acted in ways which undermined the “script” presented<br />
by anthropologists and organizers, and suggests revisions to the historiography<br />
<strong>of</strong> race at the Columbian Exposition.<br />
149