14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Marsha␣ L. Richmond Wayne State University<br />

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

Cell Theory on the Eve <strong>of</strong> Genetics<br />

A cardinal event in the early history <strong>of</strong> genetics was the recognition circa<br />

1904 that the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the chromosomes during the process <strong>of</strong> replication<br />

closely paralleled that expected <strong>of</strong> Mendelizing factors. Thus was founded the<br />

new subdiscipline <strong>of</strong> cytogenetics, which mutually enriched classical genetics<br />

and cytology. Yet for decades many biologists had accepted the idea that the<br />

nucleus was the seat <strong>of</strong> heredity and development. Indeed, by 1900 Richard<br />

Hertwig and his school at Munich were experimentally investigating the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> this control. In addition to Theodor Boveri and Richard Goldschmidt, the<br />

young British zoologists Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Watkins Smith <strong>of</strong> Oxford and C. Clifford<br />

Dobell <strong>of</strong> Cambridge went to Munich to study with Hertwig. Yet while Smith<br />

accepted the nucleocentric model <strong>of</strong> the cell, Dobell subsequently became a<br />

vocal critic. This paper will assess the status <strong>of</strong> cell theory on the eve <strong>of</strong> genetics<br />

by comparing and contrasting the views <strong>of</strong> Goldschmidt, Dobell, and Smith.<br />

It explores the extent to which an individual’s view <strong>of</strong> the organization <strong>of</strong> life<br />

influences their understanding <strong>of</strong> “cellular reality.”<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Michael␣ F. Robinson University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison<br />

Chicago’s Eskimo Village:<br />

Reconsidering Race at the World’s Columbian Exposition, 1893<br />

In 1893, over two dozen Innu villagers from Labrador settled into their new<br />

home on the grounds <strong>of</strong> the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. They<br />

took their place among a variety <strong>of</strong> transplanted “savage” and “semi-barbarous”<br />

peoples who constituted the anthropology exhibits <strong>of</strong> the fair. Organizers set<br />

the Eskimo Village on the main Exposition grounds, apart from other ethnic<br />

villages on the Midway, and at a distance from the “White City,” the fair’s<br />

shrine to Anglo-Saxon progress. In so doing, they used the fairgrounds to<br />

represent a theory <strong>of</strong> cultural evolution still widespread within the<br />

anthropological community. Within this theory, the Eskimo Village symbolized<br />

human culture at its most primitive and <strong>of</strong>fered white Americans a glimpse <strong>of</strong><br />

their own prehistoric past. Recent studies have made use <strong>of</strong> the racial symbolism<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Columbian Exposition in interpreting pr<strong>of</strong>essional and popular discourse<br />

about race in late nineteenth century America. Yet few studies have looked<br />

beyond the planning and production <strong>of</strong> the fair’s exhibitions to the agency <strong>of</strong><br />

native participants themselves. This paper examines the actions <strong>of</strong> the Innu<br />

within the Eskimo Village and their effect upon popular discourse. It argues<br />

that the Innu frequently acted in ways which undermined the “script” presented<br />

by anthropologists and organizers, and suggests revisions to the historiography<br />

<strong>of</strong> race at the Columbian Exposition.<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!