2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
which the fortunes <strong>of</strong> an empire depended appeared quite commonly in<br />
European literature <strong>of</strong> the twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth centuries, the<br />
apparent invention <strong>of</strong> just such an instrument in 1608 would have filled a<br />
preexistent and familiar cultural fantasy.<br />
Joan␣ L. Richards Brown University<br />
Sophia and Augustus De Morgan’s Faiths <strong>of</strong> Mind<br />
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
In 1863, the London house <strong>of</strong> Longman, Green, Longman, published From<br />
Matter to Spirit by “CD” with a Preface by “AB,” with the mathematical<br />
symbolism in ironic contrast with the spiritualist convictions in the book.<br />
Behind the AB stood Augustus De Morgan, the distinguished pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong><br />
mathematics at University College, London; behind the CD stood his wife,<br />
the socially active mother <strong>of</strong> their seven children. Augustus’s “Preface” served<br />
as a defense <strong>of</strong> the intellectual legitimacy <strong>of</strong> his wife’s report on a decade <strong>of</strong><br />
investigation into the mid-Victorian world <strong>of</strong> channeling mediums, turning<br />
tables, and writing spirits. Augustus was unequivocal in his conviction about<br />
the events and experiments Sophia reported in her book: “I am perfectly<br />
convinced that I have both seen and heard in a manner which should make<br />
unbelief impossible, things called spiritual . . .” (v) Even as Augustus defended<br />
the legitimacy <strong>of</strong> his wife’s experiences, however, he distanced himself from<br />
them, saying he would not “stand committed either for or against the<br />
conclusions <strong>of</strong> the book.” (v) Augustus’s ambivalent support for Sophia’s work<br />
can be seen as an attempt to defend his reputation as a cool-headed scholar<br />
even as he used that reputation to protect his wife’s investigations. But it was<br />
more than that. Sophia’s book contained an interpretation <strong>of</strong> those incidents<br />
built on a view <strong>of</strong> language and truth diametrically opposed to the logical one<br />
he had been developing and defending for years. Augustus did not address his<br />
and Sophia’s differences directly in his preface, but at its end he did recognize<br />
them with the comment: “Between us we have, in a certain way, cleared the<br />
dish; like that celebrated couple <strong>of</strong> whom one could eat no fat and the other no<br />
lean.” (xlv) From Matter to Spirit appeared at the very beginning, if not before,<br />
the period in which Victorians and their historians have located the Victorian<br />
crisis <strong>of</strong> faith. What is more, neither Augustus nor Sophia would have claimed<br />
allegiance to the kind <strong>of</strong> religious faith that would support crises among their<br />
more orthodox compatriots. Nevertheless, the tension between the ways that<br />
they assigned meaning to words and events mirrors that which many <strong>of</strong> their<br />
somewhat younger compatriots faced within themselves. The Victorian crisis<br />
<strong>of</strong> faith is <strong>of</strong>ten interpreted as the product <strong>of</strong> an epistemological crisis. In this<br />
paper I want to use From Matter to Spirit to reconsider that crisis from the<br />
perspective <strong>of</strong> meaning as opposed to epistemology, to consider what supported<br />
Sophia’s and Augustus’s complementary worlds, and to explore what made<br />
their coexistence so difficult in the next generation.<br />
147