14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to a scientific instrument such as Newton’s prisms or Boyle’s air pump. The<br />

story <strong>of</strong> Wislicenus, Fittig and Michael, in which the authority <strong>of</strong> no instrument<br />

in a conventional sense was at stake, suggests a reconsideration <strong>of</strong> the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> instruments in chemistry, and the limitations on the historiographical<br />

assumptions behind the concept <strong>of</strong> making instruments “transparent.”<br />

Nicolas Rasmussen<br />

Steroids at War:<br />

Biomedical Researchers, the Pharmaceutical Industry,<br />

and the Hormones <strong>of</strong> the Adrenal Cortex, 1940-1946<br />

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

It is widely considered that the Second World War marks a discontinuity for<br />

both physical and life sciences, in that large numbers <strong>of</strong> basic researchers<br />

were brought together in well-funded government research projects for the<br />

accomplishment <strong>of</strong> practical military goals, initiating a transition to the postwar<br />

era <strong>of</strong> ‘big science’. This paper discusses wartime research on the cortical<br />

hormones, one <strong>of</strong> the largest <strong>of</strong> both the OSRD Committee on Medical Research<br />

and Committee on Chemistry, which despite failure to meet its wartime goals<br />

led to the postwar introduction <strong>of</strong> the archetypal miracle-drug cortisone.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the sharing <strong>of</strong> information and division <strong>of</strong> labor both within the<br />

basic life science research community, and between biomedical research<br />

institutions and commercial contractors, points instead to a continuity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

manner <strong>of</strong> life scientist-industrialist relations throughout the war period. This<br />

finding suggests that the degree to which many areas <strong>of</strong> life science in the<br />

interwar period were already organized on a large scale and oriented toward<br />

industrial application has been generally underestimated.<br />

Benjamin␣ W. Redekop Kettering University<br />

Thomas Reid and the Problem <strong>of</strong> Induction:<br />

From Common Experience to Common Sense<br />

In this paper I argue that in responding to the “problem <strong>of</strong> induction” as<br />

advanced by David Hume, the influential eighteenth-century Scottish<br />

philosopher Thomas Reid reformulated Aristotelian foundationalism in<br />

distinctly modern terms. An educator and mathematician self-consciously<br />

working within the framework <strong>of</strong> the new science, Reid articulated a<br />

philosophical foundation for natural knowledge anchored in the human<br />

constitution and in processes <strong>of</strong> adjudication in an emerging modern public<br />

sphere <strong>of</strong> enlightened discourse. In the process Reid transformed one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

traditional foundations <strong>of</strong> Aristotelian science—common experience—into a<br />

philosophically and socially justified notion <strong>of</strong> “common sense.” The new<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!