2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Erin␣ H. McLeary University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
War Pathologies/the Pathology <strong>of</strong> War:<br />
Museum Collecting in the First World War<br />
For physicians and medical researchers involved in the treatment and prevention<br />
<strong>of</strong> injury and disease during the Great War, trench diseases, mustard gas,<br />
influenza, and above all, modern artillery posed new and painful types <strong>of</strong><br />
problems. This paper examines the response <strong>of</strong> one group <strong>of</strong> medical scientists,<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the Museum Unit <strong>of</strong> the American Expeditionary Force. In the face <strong>of</strong><br />
a set <strong>of</strong> new and horrific pathologies, these scientists responded by employing<br />
an old method derived from natural history practice: they collected. In total,<br />
the Army Medical Museum in Washington, D.C., received from the AEF<br />
approximately 15,000 specimens illustrative <strong>of</strong> war-induced pathologies. Why<br />
did these scientists apply the methods <strong>of</strong> the field sciences to the medical<br />
problems posed by modern war? The collection <strong>of</strong> specimens illustrating the<br />
injuries and diseases <strong>of</strong> war was not a new medical pastime. The Army Medical<br />
Museum had been founded to serve as a repository for specimens from the<br />
Civil War. But, by the time <strong>of</strong> World War I, as AEF Colonel Louis Wilson<br />
noted, such collecting “would seem to have relatively little place in a military<br />
expeditionary force.” Yet to a certain scientific and medical mindset, field<br />
collecting seemed an inherently logical method <strong>of</strong> organizing and systematizing<br />
new knowledge, and arranging specimens into exhibits seemed to provide a<br />
natural means for diffusing that knowledge among researchers and medical<br />
practitioners. The logic <strong>of</strong> the museum medium, however, was not always<br />
apparent to military commanders. And precisely because these war specimens<br />
were organized within a museum setting, they functioned as more than mere<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> novel injuries. The collection and cataloguing <strong>of</strong> war specimens<br />
was at once a source <strong>of</strong> therapeutic optimism to observers who noted the<br />
stimulating effects <strong>of</strong> war upon progress in science and medicine, and a literal<br />
embodiment <strong>of</strong> the horrors <strong>of</strong> a war fought with new types <strong>of</strong> killing<br />
technologies. Collected on the battlefield and in base hospitals, the specimens<br />
were “the true flowers <strong>of</strong> blood and pain.”<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Susan␣ A. Miller University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />
Health in the Balance:<br />
Learning Lessons from the Landscape at Girls’ Summer Camps, 1910-1939<br />
The 1926 edition <strong>of</strong> Porter Sargent’s Guide to Summer Camps, “an invaluable<br />
resource for discriminating parents,” heartily endorsed the Girl Scout camping<br />
program for its positive health benefits. The Scout program was “carefully<br />
planned to teach good health and to develop character.” Scouting leadership<br />
could not have agreed more. From their inception in 1912, the Girl Scouts—<br />
125