14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Erin␣ H. McLeary University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

War Pathologies/the Pathology <strong>of</strong> War:<br />

Museum Collecting in the First World War<br />

For physicians and medical researchers involved in the treatment and prevention<br />

<strong>of</strong> injury and disease during the Great War, trench diseases, mustard gas,<br />

influenza, and above all, modern artillery posed new and painful types <strong>of</strong><br />

problems. This paper examines the response <strong>of</strong> one group <strong>of</strong> medical scientists,<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the Museum Unit <strong>of</strong> the American Expeditionary Force. In the face <strong>of</strong><br />

a set <strong>of</strong> new and horrific pathologies, these scientists responded by employing<br />

an old method derived from natural history practice: they collected. In total,<br />

the Army Medical Museum in Washington, D.C., received from the AEF<br />

approximately 15,000 specimens illustrative <strong>of</strong> war-induced pathologies. Why<br />

did these scientists apply the methods <strong>of</strong> the field sciences to the medical<br />

problems posed by modern war? The collection <strong>of</strong> specimens illustrating the<br />

injuries and diseases <strong>of</strong> war was not a new medical pastime. The Army Medical<br />

Museum had been founded to serve as a repository for specimens from the<br />

Civil War. But, by the time <strong>of</strong> World War I, as AEF Colonel Louis Wilson<br />

noted, such collecting “would seem to have relatively little place in a military<br />

expeditionary force.” Yet to a certain scientific and medical mindset, field<br />

collecting seemed an inherently logical method <strong>of</strong> organizing and systematizing<br />

new knowledge, and arranging specimens into exhibits seemed to provide a<br />

natural means for diffusing that knowledge among researchers and medical<br />

practitioners. The logic <strong>of</strong> the museum medium, however, was not always<br />

apparent to military commanders. And precisely because these war specimens<br />

were organized within a museum setting, they functioned as more than mere<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> novel injuries. The collection and cataloguing <strong>of</strong> war specimens<br />

was at once a source <strong>of</strong> therapeutic optimism to observers who noted the<br />

stimulating effects <strong>of</strong> war upon progress in science and medicine, and a literal<br />

embodiment <strong>of</strong> the horrors <strong>of</strong> a war fought with new types <strong>of</strong> killing<br />

technologies. Collected on the battlefield and in base hospitals, the specimens<br />

were “the true flowers <strong>of</strong> blood and pain.”<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Susan␣ A. Miller University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

Health in the Balance:<br />

Learning Lessons from the Landscape at Girls’ Summer Camps, 1910-1939<br />

The 1926 edition <strong>of</strong> Porter Sargent’s Guide to Summer Camps, “an invaluable<br />

resource for discriminating parents,” heartily endorsed the Girl Scout camping<br />

program for its positive health benefits. The Scout program was “carefully<br />

planned to teach good health and to develop character.” Scouting leadership<br />

could not have agreed more. From their inception in 1912, the Girl Scouts—<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!