14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

discussions surrounding the conceptual foundations <strong>of</strong> biology, questions <strong>of</strong><br />

development were at the core <strong>of</strong> all theoretical systems proposed in those decades.<br />

In this paper I will discuss the importance <strong>of</strong> development in the formulation <strong>of</strong><br />

theoretical biology and the central role <strong>of</strong> developmental processes in the<br />

rhetorical arguments for the independence <strong>of</strong> biology from physics and chemistry.<br />

I will analyze how the increased popularity <strong>of</strong> neo-vitalistic arguments in the<br />

wake <strong>of</strong> Driesch’s popularization <strong>of</strong> these ideas led to the emergence <strong>of</strong> theoretical<br />

biology as a search for alternatives to the age old mechanist-vitalist divide.<br />

Specifically, I will show how certain key concepts that emerged in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> experimental research programs, such as Hans Spemann’s organizer, Alexander<br />

Gurwitsch’s morphogenetic field, Ludwig von Bertalanffy’s organismal systems,<br />

or Oskar Vogt’s eunomic series were incorporated into conceptual systems about<br />

the foundations <strong>of</strong> biology. I will also show how these conceptual developments<br />

were enabled by the organizational efforts <strong>of</strong> a small number <strong>of</strong> people (Julius<br />

Schaxel, Wilhelm Roux, Vladislav Ruzicka, Adolf Meyer-Abich among others)<br />

who controlled and established various series <strong>of</strong> monographs and scientific<br />

journals and actively promoted the idea <strong>of</strong> theoretical biology.<br />

116<br />

André␣ R. LeBlanc CIRST, Université du Québec à Montréal<br />

On Negative Hallucinations and the Origins <strong>of</strong> the Unconscious<br />

This paper examines a little-known debate over the nature <strong>of</strong> negative hallucinations<br />

in the late 1880s France. Negative hallucination is the phenomenon by which an<br />

object is rendered invisible to a hypnotic subject. The study <strong>of</strong> negative hallucination<br />

produced one <strong>of</strong> the earliest arguments for the existence <strong>of</strong> the unconscious. Through<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> intricate experiments, investigators like the philosopher Pierre Janet<br />

(1859-1947), the psychologist Alfred Binet (1857-1911) and the physician<br />

Hippolyte Bernheim (1840-1919) showed that subjects were somehow still able<br />

to see the invisible objects that they could not presumably see. Janet seemed to<br />

solve this mystery by demonstrating, in 1887, that a dissociated consciousness<br />

saw the invisible objects without the subject’s main consciousness knowing it.<br />

This was the first experimental application <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> dissociation, which<br />

was introduced the preceding year, in 1886, and which has become so prominent<br />

in recent years with the epidemic <strong>of</strong> multiple personality disorder, renamed<br />

dissociative identity disorder in 1994. Dissociation (then as now) seemed the only<br />

way <strong>of</strong> explaining the phenomenon. In 1889, however, the Belgian philosopher<br />

and psychologist Joseph Delboeuf (1831-1896) began arguing in favour <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sophisticated form <strong>of</strong> simulation and against state theories <strong>of</strong> hypnosis. His work<br />

undermined the then burgeoning theory <strong>of</strong> the unconscious and, as this paper will<br />

show, is still relevant to current debates over the nature <strong>of</strong> hypnosis and allied<br />

mental disorders. More specifically, I believe Delboeuf indirectly demonstrated<br />

that the concept <strong>of</strong> dissociation could never be proven and I will give a book prize<br />

to the first person who shows that I am wrong.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!