14.01.2014 Views

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />

grasped as a whole, disclosing the existential core <strong>of</strong> a person. After the<br />

publication <strong>of</strong> Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit in 1927, Binswanger shifted his<br />

phenomenological approach to assess not only the individual consciousness but<br />

the inextricably linked complex <strong>of</strong> the individual situated in his/her world, or<br />

“Being-in-the-World” (In-der-Welt-sein). Binswanger’s first phenomenological<br />

case studies appeared in 1931, in which manic utterances and writings were<br />

found to reveal the presence <strong>of</strong> a manic “world,” charted by its spatial, temporal,<br />

and material dimensions. Despite Heidegger’s repudiation <strong>of</strong> the empirical use<br />

<strong>of</strong> his insights, and the skepticism <strong>of</strong> some clinical psychiatrists, Binswanger’s<br />

focus on the extremes <strong>of</strong> psychopathological experience helped to illuminate<br />

phenomenological “worlds,” and phenomenological methods “normalized”<br />

psychosis ins<strong>of</strong>ar as they demonstrated the structural similarities between<br />

psychotic and normal experience.<br />

H<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Mark␣ A. Largent Oregon State University<br />

Biological Justifications for Progressive Reforms<br />

Historians and historians <strong>of</strong> science have emphasized the importance to<br />

evolutionary theory, particularly Darwinism, to the American progressive<br />

movement. They have asserted that Darwinism provided progressive reformers<br />

with scientific legitimacy and it reinforced their belief in progress. What specific<br />

role did American biologists themselves play in progressive reform<br />

movements? Moreover, how did biologists participation in the progressive<br />

movement impact them and their pr<strong>of</strong>ession? By examining several early<br />

twentieth-century progressive causes in which natural scientists like William<br />

Ritter, David Starr Jordan, Vernon Kellogg, and Charles Davenport participated,<br />

this paper will explore the reciprocal relationship between American biologists<br />

and progressivism. They provided scientific justifications for progressive<br />

initiatives like increased education, the political enfranchisement <strong>of</strong> women,<br />

eugenics, and the international peace movement. At the same time, their<br />

participation in social and political causes enhanced their pr<strong>of</strong>essional status<br />

and gave them the opportunity to demonstrate possible applications for<br />

evolutionary science that could better the human condition.<br />

Manfred␣ D. Laubichler Princeton University<br />

From a Developmental Point <strong>of</strong> View:<br />

Theories <strong>of</strong> Development in the Conception <strong>of</strong> Theoretical Biology<br />

During the early decades <strong>of</strong> the 20th century theoretical biology emerged as a<br />

discourse among experimental biologists and philosophers. Even though<br />

scientists from a variety <strong>of</strong> different experimental disciplines contributed to these<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!