2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
grasped as a whole, disclosing the existential core <strong>of</strong> a person. After the<br />
publication <strong>of</strong> Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit in 1927, Binswanger shifted his<br />
phenomenological approach to assess not only the individual consciousness but<br />
the inextricably linked complex <strong>of</strong> the individual situated in his/her world, or<br />
“Being-in-the-World” (In-der-Welt-sein). Binswanger’s first phenomenological<br />
case studies appeared in 1931, in which manic utterances and writings were<br />
found to reveal the presence <strong>of</strong> a manic “world,” charted by its spatial, temporal,<br />
and material dimensions. Despite Heidegger’s repudiation <strong>of</strong> the empirical use<br />
<strong>of</strong> his insights, and the skepticism <strong>of</strong> some clinical psychiatrists, Binswanger’s<br />
focus on the extremes <strong>of</strong> psychopathological experience helped to illuminate<br />
phenomenological “worlds,” and phenomenological methods “normalized”<br />
psychosis ins<strong>of</strong>ar as they demonstrated the structural similarities between<br />
psychotic and normal experience.<br />
H<br />
S<br />
S<br />
Mark␣ A. Largent Oregon State University<br />
Biological Justifications for Progressive Reforms<br />
Historians and historians <strong>of</strong> science have emphasized the importance to<br />
evolutionary theory, particularly Darwinism, to the American progressive<br />
movement. They have asserted that Darwinism provided progressive reformers<br />
with scientific legitimacy and it reinforced their belief in progress. What specific<br />
role did American biologists themselves play in progressive reform<br />
movements? Moreover, how did biologists participation in the progressive<br />
movement impact them and their pr<strong>of</strong>ession? By examining several early<br />
twentieth-century progressive causes in which natural scientists like William<br />
Ritter, David Starr Jordan, Vernon Kellogg, and Charles Davenport participated,<br />
this paper will explore the reciprocal relationship between American biologists<br />
and progressivism. They provided scientific justifications for progressive<br />
initiatives like increased education, the political enfranchisement <strong>of</strong> women,<br />
eugenics, and the international peace movement. At the same time, their<br />
participation in social and political causes enhanced their pr<strong>of</strong>essional status<br />
and gave them the opportunity to demonstrate possible applications for<br />
evolutionary science that could better the human condition.<br />
Manfred␣ D. Laubichler Princeton University<br />
From a Developmental Point <strong>of</strong> View:<br />
Theories <strong>of</strong> Development in the Conception <strong>of</strong> Theoretical Biology<br />
During the early decades <strong>of</strong> the 20th century theoretical biology emerged as a<br />
discourse among experimental biologists and philosophers. Even though<br />
scientists from a variety <strong>of</strong> different experimental disciplines contributed to these<br />
115